International Organization for Migration receives $10 million from US State Department to help Iraqis return home

Just now someone sent me a press release dated today from the IOM (sorry I can’t find the link for it) but it begins:

IRAQ – US$ 10 Million to Help Returning Families Reintegrate – IOM has received US$10 million from the US Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM) to meet the most urgent needs of Iraqi returnees.

Working a with the Ministry of Displacement and Migration (MoDM) and host communities, IOM is assisting returnees and local residents without jobs or underemployed by providing information and counseling; grants for the purchase of tools, equipment or base materials; and vocational and/or business training, to create or expand small businesses or to find employment.

[…..]

IOM monitors have identified some 52,000 post-2006 returnee families in approximately 800 locations; with the majority returning to Baghdad, and significant groups to Diyala and Anbar.

Seventy-one per cent of returnees interviewed by IOM said they had decided to return to their places of origin because of improved security or a combination of improved security and difficult conditions in the place of displacement.

Sounds like it could save the US taxpayers more money and be less of a headache then hauling tens of thousands of Iraqis to the US only to have them complain about no jobs and poor living conditions.

For information on IOM in Iraq go here.

The WSJ adds more information to Iraqi Palestinian resettlement plans

The Wall Street Journal today has followed up on the story first reported by the Christian Science Monitor, here, last week about the US resettlement plans for approximately 1350 Iraqi Palestinians.  We first got a hint of this plan here.

A few pieces of clarification that have added to the previous CSM story follow. 

 The WSJ confirms the resettlement is controversial.

The U.S. agreed to resettle 1,350 Palestinians displaced by fighting in Iraq, marking the largest resettlement ever of Palestinian refugees in the nation. 

The decision appears to signal a shift in Washington’s previous position against resettling Palestinians out of concern about the potential impact on U.S. relations with Israel and the Arab world. The resettlement, which is slated to begin this fall, is likely to illicit strong reactions from people on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Here is a section I found troubling.  The reporter, Miriam Jordan, says that Arab countries see this initiative (resettling this group of Palestinians) as a sign of new openness toward the Muslim world in the wake of Obama’s Cairo speech, but she quotes no one actually saying that.   In fact, we know that at least one spokesman for the so-called Muslim world, the American Al-Shabaab, is saying that they (Muslims) will not be suckered by Obama’s charismatic words, here.

Many Arab countries interpreted President Barack Obama’s speech in Cairo last month as an attempt to put U.S. relations with Islamic nations on a new course and dissipate the strain that characterized ties during the Bush administration. They see the offer of accepting Palestinian refugees as an early sign of a new openness.  [who is “they?”]

The following information confirms what I believe may well be the case, that Arab countries are not happy with this turn of events.  As we have reported many times at RRW, the refugees are needed to keep the sword over Israel’s head, the more poor and angry Palestinians in the world the better.

However, Mr. Asali [American Task Force on Palestine] cautioned that it is bound to irk Palestinian and Arab leaders who interpret U.S. willingness to resettle Palestinians — which comes with full rights such as citizenship down the road — as “a conspiracy to liquidate the Palestinian refugee issue.” With the exception of Jordan, no country in the Middle East has granted citizenship to Palestinian refugees. Many Arab countries believe that fully integrating large numbers of Palestinian refugees would undercut their demand for an independent state.

One American Jewish organization doesn’t like this plan either, but for completely differant reasons.

At least one pro-Israel group in the U.S. deems it a mistake to absorb the Palestinian Iraqis, who were welcomed by Saddam Hussein and regarded as loyal supporters of his regime. “We don’t think that Washington should be bringing in a group of people who we know were publicly and consistently hostile to the United States and its closest ally, Israel,” said Morton Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America.

The WSJ article then gives us more background then we ever knew previously about how these Palestinians came to be in Iraq and why they were so hated.  And, once again confirms my contention that Muslim charity toward fellow Muslims is a myth.  These Iraqi Palestinians knew it was a myth too, here.

Palestinians moved to Iraq after Arab-Israeli conflicts in 1948 and 1967, and following the Gulf War in 1991. The community grew to nearly 35,000. “Saddam Hussein made a point of using Palestinian refugees to show solidarity with the Palestinian cause,” said Bill Frelick, refugee-policy director at Human Rights Watch in Washington.

The preferential treatment bred resentment among many Iraqis. After Baghdad fell to U.S.-led forces in 2003, Palestinians became a target for harassment and violence, including bombings and murder. A particular point of contention had been the government’s provision of subsidized housing for Palestinians, often at the expense of mostly Shiite landlords who received little rent from the government in return.

After Mr. Hussein was deposed, many landlords evicted their Palestinian tenants, who are mainly Sunni Muslims. Driven out of Baghdad and other cities, the Palestinians tried to flee to neighboring Syria and Jordan, which already host hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees. When those countries blocked their entry, the displaced Palestinians sought refuge in camps that lack basic infrastructure and jeopardize their health and safety, said Mr. Frelick.

Read the whole article at the WSJ, and for more background use our search function for “Iraqi Palestinians.”  We have written a whole slew of posts on the subject.

And, by the way, these Palestinians will come to the US as Iraqis, in the Iraqi refugee category.

Iraqi refugees: we hear America stinks, send us to Europe!

I came across this lengthy and very informative article days ago, but only now am finding time to post it.   From The National in Abu Dhabi, it was published last week.  It begins with the tale of an Iraqi middle-aged woman granted refugee status by the UN and assigned to go to the US.   She never showed up for her flight.

When the 4am flight to Budapest left Damascus on April 8, a seat on board was reserved for a 50-year-old Iraqi widow, one from hundreds of thousands of waiting refugees given the chance for a new life in the United States.

Salwar Alwan was to land in Hungary, sit out a few hours at the airport and then make the early afternoon Delta Air Lines flight to New York, arriving in her new country just before 5pm. From there, she would go down to Arizona, where a house was waiting for her new beginning.

She had spent weeks preparing for the trip; her bags were packed, her paperwork was in order. She had put aside enough money for the taxi to the airport. But at 1.30am that Wednesday she had not left the house. An hour and a half later there was a phone call from the refugee workers handling her case, telling her to come quickly, explaining that she could not afford to miss the flight. She did not move. 

“Right up until the last minute I was planning to go to,” she said. “They called at 3am and told me to hurry, they told me to hurry, that I must hurry. I told them no, I wouldn’t go. I made the decision.”

When Ms Alwan fled Iraq in 2003, just after her husband was kidnapped – she saw him for the last time, she said, blindfolded, handcuffed and led away by masked gunmen – it was her first trip outside the country. She had lived her entire life in Nasariyah, in southern Iraq, and had never learnt to read or write. She knew little of the outside world.

The day before her flight to the United States Ms Alwan talked to some other Iraqi refugees, better educated than she, and what they had said terrified her.

One thing that scared her—black people in America!  But, that (racist Iraqis) can’t be because we know minorities aren’t racist toward other minorities.  It’s only majority populations of white people that are racists, or at least that is the mantra.

“They told me that if I went to America there would be black people in Arizona and they’d kidnap me or kill me or rape me. They said there would be medical students who would trick me and give me money and then use me for experiments. They said I’d be taken to the zoo and fed to the animals.

According to a refugee resettlement agency employee in Rhode Island, unrealistic expectations abound.

Few Iraqis waiting for resettlement – the golden ticket out of misery they all dream of – have a real idea of what waits for them if they are lucky enough to be taken in by the United States, Europe or Australia. The majority fall into one of two groups: those who think all of their problems will immediately evaporate or, increasingly, those who fear they will not cope with the hard-edged cut and thrust of life in modern, recession-hit America if they are sent there.

“I don’t know what the refugees are told in Syria, but they are always confused when they get here,” said Bahar Sadr, the programme manager at the International Institute of Rhode Island, a refugee transition centre in Providence, Rhode Island, on the east coast.

“They generally think they’ll be handed a large sum of money when they land, whereas in fact they arrive immediately in debt because they have to pay back the airfare for their flight here.

A couple of Iraqis resettled in Rhode Island couldn’t take being at the bottom rungs of society here, so they went back to the “dangerous” Middle East.   I think we need to start keeping track of how many Iraqis go back (probably without even paying back their airfare which must really tick off the refugee agencies that get a kickback from taxpayer funded airfares).

Word is spreading and Iraqis are praying for an assignment to Europe, where the welfare is better.

Word of the unexpectedly difficult lives newly arrived Iraqis find in the United States has started to spread back to the refugee population of more than one million in Syria, Jordan and Turkey. Families and friends remain in close touch and there is a growing consensus among the waiting refugee population – pray that you get resettlement in Europe, where state assistance is more generous.

“I don’t know about Europe, but America is all about competition. If you don’t compete, you get trampled on,” Mr Sadr said.

Well, Mr. Sadr, the way things are going with the Obama Administration it won’t be long now before that hallmark of American greatness—competition—will be annihilated.   People will be able to sit around, doing nothing, and collect big fat welfare payments extracted from the evil rich—right?  Well, at least until the geese laying the golden eggs are dead.

Just please send us to Europe where we hear we will be cared for from cradle to grave.

“We want to go to Europe, not America,” said Abdul Salam Shakir, a father of three sons, the youngest two of whom, 15-year-old Harath and seven-year old Mohammad, have Down syndrome and require constant care. The family fled Iraq in the winter of 2006, when the sectarian war was at its peak. They now live on the outskirts of Damascus, surviving on UN handouts, money sent from siblings overseas and the rent from their house* in Baghdad.

America won’t give them lifelong care for their children!

“The Americans won’t give us treatment for the children,” Mr Shakir, 51, said. “Other refugees who went told me they don’t have the treatment, the Americans don’t look after the children. We don’t have a choice, but I hear that in Europe the treatment is better, the situation in Europe is better. They support you there and they support people with disabilities.”

Since we are such a downright mean country (where have I heard that before?), let’s hope they all go to Europe then!

* Note these people own a house!  They are not destitute camp dwellers.

 

Additional thoughts a few minutes later:  Maybe each prospective refugee coming to the US should sign an agreement of sorts saying he/she knows that life is hard and competitive in the US, that they will have to make it basically on their own after a brief resettlement period.   They would agree to come only if they confirm they are the kind of person who can start at the bottom of society and work their way up and that they will respect our system of laws while they are doing it.

I once gave a speech at Valley Forge Military Academy and the thrust of it was—the students (cadets) are completely responsible for what they make of themselves.  If they screw up it is on them (not their parents, the school, or their life circumstances) and if they succeed it is all because they have chosen to.  That to me is what America offers.

What it’s like to be a refugee in America

That is the title of a Christian Science Monitor article a couple days ago.   Written by reporter Mary Wiltenberg, it is very thorough and well worth the read—even if I disagree with some of it! 

The article weaves an account of an African family’s experiences as they settle into life in Atlanta in between information on the program and how it works.   As a matter of fact, as I read it, I thought maybe the US State Department should hire Ms. Wiltenberg to write a manual of sorts on the program to be distributed in communities where refugees are resettled—to help answer citizens’ many questions in a straightforward and non-patronizing way.  The fact that citizens of resettlement cities are not consulted and generally left in the dark, leads to  much misunderstanding and is a major complaint of mine.   The reporter does a very good job explaining a complex federal program, warts and all.

The progam has problems.

A cornerstone of US foreign policy since the Carter administration, the resettlement program draws universal praise for its lifesaving generosity. But since 1980, it has been no politician’s top priority and has gone without major reform. And in today’s economy, the minimally funded program is failing many of those it rescues. Without a basic cultural foundation and language skills, some refugees who arrived in the US eager to build a life are ending up on the streets. Some are even returning to the war zones they fled, in desperate search of livelihoods.

This is the general outline of what refugees receive but one big issue is that it varies from agency to agency and city to city.   Some agencies do a better job than others.

Funded according to the volume of refugees they resettle, these agencies get $900 per head to cover administrative costs plus a refugee’s first three months in America: food, clothes, furniture, housing deposit, and rent. The agencies raise funds and distribute donated goods, and provide many refugees with help finding jobs, learning English, and accessing medical care, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services – and states sometimes chip in public assistance. But eight months after arrival, refugees are on their own and newcomers are lined up behind them, just as wasted and lost.

There are not enough jobs, especially now, for all the refugees arriving.

But today, refugees entering the job market are one of the biggest casualties of the economic collapse. In Phoenix, a major resettlement center, 80 percent of refugees were employed and self-supporting within four months of their arrival in 2007. Now, only 10 percent are.

It’s a similar scene here in the Atlanta suburb of Clarkston, an enclave of resettled refugees from more than 50 countries. On a cold February morning, Bhutanese refugee Bhanu Dhakal waited in line with 60 other refugees at the farmers’ market where Dawami got her first job. After two hours, he learned that there was no work, even for an experienced high school English teacher like him. For four months, he’d been hunting, willing to take any job. He and his wife were amazed: “This is not what we expected in America.”

There is a need to collect data on how the refugees are doing.

“Right now, we know there are huge problems facing refugees who resettle here because of the increase in unemployment and cutbacks in government services,” says Tim Riesser, a foreign-policy aide to Sen. Patrick Leahy (D) of Vermont. While little hard data has been collected on how many refugees are falling through the cracks, resettlement agencies see a growing number who are unemployed and unable to pay rent.

No plans from the Obama Administration to reform the program, maybe just more money.   Then this!   It costs on average $14,000 per refugee for resettlement, but that figure must not take into account those who stay on various forms of welfare for years.

There’s no sign that the Obama administration plans a major revision of resettlement policy in the near term, and the issue isn’t on the Congressional agenda. Key agencies – State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, and the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) – are in a holding pattern until administration appointees are in place.

What could change is funding. Over $1 billion is budgeted federally for resettlement (about $14,000 per refugee). But since the program’s founding, funding hasn’t kept pace with the cost of living – the length of assistance to new arrivals has shrunk: from 24 months three decades ago to a maximum of eight today.

So who are refugees?  And, where does it end?

Who are refugees? The 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, and its 1967 Protocol, which the US signed, says: People outside their home countries who can’t return due to “well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.” (“Asylum seekers” have the same fear of persecution, but are already living in the countries to which they apply for protection.) This wording applies to many desperate people today, from the thousands of Sudanese streaming out of Darfur to the 2 million Iraqis forced from their country by the US war to 3 million Afghans still homeless 29 years after that nation’s previous war.

Over time, though, the definition has become problematic. Each year, millions around the world flee wars that devastate their lands and decimate their people, but don’t count as targeted persecution. Tens of millions more are “economic migrants,” uprooted by lack of livelihood.

In response to the above, I’m going to ask readers to watch the video at the NumbersUSA link at the top of the page, and then tell me where it ends.  I know it sounds harsh but we aren’t going to save them all. 

There is lots more in this article that you should find interesting.  I was going to remind you of the fraud that occurs in the program, how desperate people lie outright or just inadvertently, but it’s late and I am running out of steam.

American Al-Shabaab challenges Obama, says Obama’s ‘magical charisma’ won’t cut it

I told you about Al-Amriki the other day here, but thanks to a tip from Bill this morning you can hear for yourself the American Al-Shabaab mocking Obama and his Cairo speech, here.

The gist of his address is:  You (Obama) can’t fool us with your magical charisma.  There will be no peace for America, we won’t extend our hands to you.  Only our swords will be extended to you.

By the way, I think when Al-Amriki says ‘until you get out of our lands’ he pretty much is implying the whole world eventually, not just a few African and Middle Eastern countries.