Iraqi refugees arriving fast and furious now

Barbara Day, domestic resettlement section chief at the State Department, speaking at a refugee conference in Phoenix, Arizona this week gave the audience some interesting information.   She said that the US had resettled over 12,000 Iraqi refugees already in the first half of the fiscal year which began on October 1, 2007.    The goal for the entire fiscal year is 12,000.

In the first half of the federal fiscal year, 12,850 Iraqis arrived in the U.S.

That is very strange since Matthew Lee reported only a month ago that we had admitted only 1,876 as of March 1. 

The State Department said Saturday that 444 Iraqi refugees entered the country in February. That puts total admissions for the current budget year, which began Oct. 1, at 1,876 and leaves the administration seven months to admit 10,124 to reach its goal.

The State Department and the volags must have been busy little beavers this past month.   I guess that would also explain why Lee (the Associated press reporter) had nothing bad to say about the Bush Administration on April first. 

How many of the Iraqis admitted so far are Christian and how many are Muslim, that is what I would like to know.

Iraqi refugees: pow-wow of bigwig advocates this week in DC

Update April 3, 2008:   Here is link for the program tomorrow.   And, also read this excellent discussion of the Refugee Resettlement program at Frontpage magazine where national refugee expert, Don Barnett,  discusses reforms proposed by David Martin and others.

The Matthew J. Ryan Public Policy Forum will bring together on Friday in Washington, DC a group of important people to discuss how bad the US has been about helping Iraqi refugees.   No, they don’t actually say that last part,  but you can tell by the line-up of speakers and the questions they plan to address that this will hardly be the “bipartisan” forum organizers claim.

Here are the questions they plan to address:

More than two million people have fled Iraq and hundreds of thousands more are internally displaced within Iraq. Who are the refugees? Why are they fleeing? What is their status under the law? What conditions and obstacles are the refugees facing in host countries? What ethical and moral considerations are posed by the refugee flow? What are the ramifications of the flow? What challenges does the refugee flow present to neighboring countries and to relations in the Middle East? What has the United States government done to offer refugees protection? What role should the United States and other countries play in the refugee crisis?

Notice there isn’t one question involving national security or the difficulties Christians face due to real persecution by Muslim extremists.   In the list of speakers there isn’t one from Homeland Security, nor a single speaker like Congressman Rohrabacher who would question a wholesale airlift of tens of thousands of Iraqis to America if one should be proposed. 

The list includes Ambassadors from Syria and Jordan.  Do you think anyone will ask the Syrian ambassador what his country could do to help stablize Iraq so the refugees could go home?  Or, do you think he will just be there with a hand out looking for US taxpayers to send some cool millions to Syria.

Human Rights Watch, which plans a big lobbying campaign on Iraqi refugees in mid-April, will be there.    Then there are friendly reporters (where is Matthew Lee?) and pro bono lawyers who have been running back and forth to the Middle East to work their legal magic, and of course the volags who need a flow of refugees to keep collecting their government-funded salaries.

Another speaker is David Martin, Warner-Booker Distinguished Professor of International Law, University of Virginia School of Law.  I’ve been meaning for some time to direct you to his work “United States Refugee Admissions Program: Reforms for a new era of refugee resettlement”  in which he lays out his ideas for reforming refugee resettlement.   It’s all about bringing more refugees, sooner, faster and with less security screening.  

Martin wants to do away with the concept of a ceiling for refugee admissions and turn that number into a goal that would be mandated.   And, his really scary proposal is to open refugee resettlement to whole classes of people (hankering for the glory days of Vietnamese masses flowing here) and doing away with any requirement for individuals to have to prove they are persecuted.    In other words, someone could just say “I am an Iraqi” and it would be understood they were persecuted and would be allowed to enter the US. 

Professor Martin never addresses reforms that involve impacts of refugee resettlement on communities in America; he doesn’t address reforms of the system that allows volags to collect government money and not take good care of the refugees they are paid to care for.  Not once does he address whether there are certain cultures that are not going to assimilate well into American society.   He never discusses whether refugee resettlement is an employment service for big businesses in America that serves to keep wages low for all workers.  And, of course, he never once addresses whether the lack of oversight by the State Department and the Office of Refugee Resettlement allows taxpayer money to be wasted and occasionally stolen.

So, what do you think this auspicious gathering will conclude?

This is how it works, how regular American citizens have so little say in momentous decisions in Washington.   These groups, often extensively funded by taxpayers and left-leaning foundations get a publicity campaign going by getting news stories planted with the help of friendly reporters in the mainstream media.  This softening up of the public has been going on for months and months now.  

Then they have events like this one on Friday.   They already know what they will conclude because Human Rights Watch has its lobbying campaign set to begin about 10 days later.   They will move Congress to act and before you know it our doors will be flung open because anyone who has questions, or thinks we need to go slow has no organized campaign to counter balance them. 

We have 118 posts in our Iraqi refugee category for new ambitious readers!

It’s March 31st, do you know where Matthew Lee is tonight?

 Update April 3, 2008:   Still no sign of Mr. Lee’s monthly report to complain about the Bush Administration not bringing enough Iraqis to the US.   I can only conclude that the numbers were up this month and thus it was not worth reporting.    Or, maybe he is waiting for the big pow-wow tomorrow. 

Time for our monthly Matthew Lee Watch. 

We are waiting for AP reporter Matthew Lee to tell us how few Iraqi refugees arrived in the United States during the month of March.   The time of his reporting varies slightly.   Last month he posted his story about 8 hours into the first day of the month, but he was early and reported late in the evening of October 31st, so who knows it could be soon!

He will tell us how many Iraqis are in Syria and Jordan, and that we have a moral obligation to bring them to America (even Bush says so!). 

He will tell us that the Bush Administration promised to resettle 12,000 in FY 2008 which began on October 1, 2007.   Then there will be a little subtraction to show how many the Administration will need to bring to fill its quota for the year.

He may make an oblique mention of the fact that Homeland Security and the State Department were in a tussle over security issues.  I guess, by at least mentioning it, he covers his bases, but never goes into much detail about Homeland Security’s concerns about terrorists getting in as refugees.

I would really like to see him find out how many of the refugees coming from Iraq are Christians and how many are Muslim, now that would be an interesting bit of investigative reporting.

If any of you see his report before I do, please comment here and send a link!

Asylum seekers on the rise, Switzerland not so eager to take more

A European born cousin of mine asked me this past weekend about Switzerland.  Does it take refugees and asylum seekers?   I didn’t know, but just today comes a report about the rise in numbers of people seeking asylum in Europe that answers the question.   Iraqis are responsible for the rise according to this article in Swiss.info. 

After falling for five years, the number of asylum applications in industrialised countries rose by ten per cent in 2007, the United Nations refugee agency reports.

______

Switzerland, where numbers remained almost static, was in 11th place overall for the number of asylum applications it receives, comparable with Austria and Belgium.

______

The overall trend, which saw figures reach a 20-year low in 2006, has been reversed “largely because of an increase in the number of Iraqi asylum seekers”, the UNHCR said.

By the way, we haven’t mentioned Asylum much and can only say it differs from Refugee Resettlement in that those seeking asylum arrive in the country in which they request asylum on their own steam (and find good immigration lawyers!).  Refugees are processed abroad and then we pay their travel expenses.  Both groups are treated the same when they get here and are eligible for all sorts of healthcare and welfare.

We’ve heard stories of Africans (others probably too) who get on a plane somewhere in the world with a passport of some sort and dump it in the toilet upon landing in the US where they then ask for asylum.

Back to Switzerland, a Swiss refugee agency says that Switzerland could do more for refugees.  No offense to the Swiss, but I’ve spent a little time there and I was struck by how inflexible many of its citizens are, or at least the ones I knew.    They are complete neat freaks—I knew one girl who ironed her underwear!  They freshen their bed covers out the window every day!   Can you imagine the culture clashes they must have with some refugees.

According to Golay, the Swiss Refugee Council has also been calling on Switzerland to be more generous in admitting groups of refugees.

______

“A policy of taking in resettlement groups would have its place considering how few Iraqis are currently being accepted into Switzerland,” he said.

______

“Switzerland has not done this on a significant scale since the mid-1990s. We have asked Switzerland to re-adopt this policy, particularly in the case of Iraqis, some two million of whom are living outside their country in very difficult conditions with very little support.”

______

The largest single nationality group of asylum seekers in Switzerland in 2007 was Eritreans (1,662), followed by Serbs (953) and Iraqis.

Here are some interesting numbers from the article:

The industrialised countries that lodged the most asylum applications in 2007 were:

The United States: 49,200
Sweden: 36,200
France: 29,900
Canada: 28,300
Britain: 27,900
Greece: 25,110
Germany: 19,160
Italy: 14,050
Austria: 11,880
Belgium: 11,120

Switzerland was in 11th place with 10,390.

More on Congressional Hearing on Iraqi refugees

So where have you been Washington Post?   Just today (five days after RRW) the Washington Post reports on the House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Iraqi refugees.   See our coverage last Wednesday here.

This is how the reporter, Walter Pincus, begins his report:

A House hearing last Tuesday led to an unusual discussion about U.S. obligations to the 4.5 million Iraqi refugees who live inside and outside that country.

What does he mean by “unusual?”    Could he possibly mean that what Congressman Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) said was so unusual? 

Democrats demanded that the Bush administration take responsibility for the refugees displaced by the five-year-old war, help them survive in Jordan, Syria and elsewhere, and allow some into the United States.

______

But one Republican’s view is that U.S. aid might deter Iraqi refugees from going home, where those who aided the U.S. Military and could be essential to building democracy are especially needed.

______

……. Rohrabacher had another view: “They’re wonderful people who’d like to live here, especially the ones who have helped us, but the last thing we want to do is to have people who are friendly to democracy . . . moving here in large numbers at a time when they’re needed to build a new, thriving Iraq.”

I was tickled to see that the Congressman is a man after my own heart!  

We have written 110 posts on Iraqi refugees (since last July) and other than the very desperate Christians we have said all along Iraqis must go home and rebuild Iraq.