Iraqi refugees in Syria (Part I)

The US is about to embark on an ambitious campaign to resettle Iraqi refugees this year.   The State Department goal is to bring 12,000 during the fiscal year that began a few weeks ago.   Recently Senator Kennedy attached a bill to a larger defense authorization bill to add another 5000.   Washington insiders who support increases in Muslim immigration are pushing this too.   For the United Nations, Kennedy, Muslims in America, and the Volags (non-profit groups) who are paid to resettle refugees, the numbers are not enough nor is the pace fast enough to suit them.     I’m on a quest to discover who these people are, how many are there, why have they  gone to Syria, and so on.   It’s a quest the lazy mainstream media isn’t going to embark on.

The public hype has painted the following picture:  Millions of  poor and desparate refugees streaming out of Iraq, living in horrible conditions (in tents in the desert!), many with death threats against them for having worked for the US government,  no chance of ever going back to Iraq and so on.  The upshot of all this is, of course, we owe it to them to bring them to America at taxpayer expense, disperse them throughout the country, and get them on welfare.   

My first stop in trying to discover the truth is a lengthy report (June 2007) from the Brookings Institution in Washington DC entitled, Iraqi Refugees in the Syrian Arab Republic:  A Field-Based Snapshot.   Although the study often refers to the “refugee crisis” or “refugee disaster” the facts they report to some degree belie the use of such terminology.

Did you know that:

*  The number of Iraqi refugees frequently given is 4 million, but 2 million of those are in Iraq and just not living in their home towns.   Of the estimated 2 million who have left the country, approximately 1.2 million are in Syria but that hundreds of thousands of those are people who left Iraq more than 20 years ago to escape Saddam Hussein.  According to Brookings, the Saddam Hussein regime displaced a million people and the Iran-Iraq War added to those numbers.

*  We really don’t know the true numbers because Brookings says, the “crisis” happened quickly, there is no existing capacity in the Syrian Government to track such information, and the “highly political nature of the problem.”  I read that last to mean that it doesn’t suit the political powers to know the truth; it leaves them free to make up their own truth.

* After the initial US invasion it was anticipated there would be a human flood leaving Iraq, that didn’t happen unless you count the Saddam loyalists leaving Iraq.    According to Brookings, “….the first to come were members of the former regime, many but not all of whom were Sunni and most of whom were wealthy.”

* Many who left Iraq had family living in Syria and others already had business ties to that country.  As we reported yesterday in our “Tent burning” post, the refugees living in Syria are in apartments for the most part.  They do not live in tents.

* Another wave of “refugees” occured when the US initiated the surge.  Many of those perpetrating sectarian violence, including the Mahdi Army, have scooted over the border to Syria. 

* Other “refugees” have headed to Syria because they want to be resettled in a third country and know they aren’t technically refugees if they still live in Iraq.

More to come later, there is so much in this report that I can’t possibly do it justice in one post. 

UN Tents for refugees up in flames in Syria

A few days ago a million dollars worth of tents intended for refugees were set ablaze in Syria.  The origin of the fire is unknown.   Read the story here.

The United Nations refugee agency today reported that a fire in its warehouses near Damascus destroyed tents worth about $1 million, setting back operations in Syria, which is home to over a million Iraqis who have fled violence in their home country.

We have been talking about the drumbeat to bring tens of thousands of Iraqi refugees to the US, but who are the Iraqi refugees in Syria?  There are supposedly 1.2 million of them.    As the violence abates in Iraq, you will be hearing more about the refugee “crisis” because that will be how those opposed to the surge will seek media attention.    It will be all about the refugees.

I’m poring over some reports and hope later today to have some information about who is in Syria.

But, I can tell you this from what I’ve read so far.   Iraqis refuse to live in tents in the desert and the vast majority are living in apartments in Damascus and other sites in Syria.   So, why did the UN have one million dollars worth of tents in storage?  Mismanagment of resources?  Or, cynically, was it to continue the refugee “crisis” hype?

East Bay, CA–not quite a haven

Could the East Bay area of California be our Iraqi receiving area number  six?  See our post yesterday listing other areas of the US expected to receive what promises to be a flood of Iraqi refugees in the coming year.  I thought for a minute that this was Nancy Pelosi’s district, but silly me, that would be as shocking as bringing Iraqi refugees to Hyannisport.

This article isn’t quite so cheery as the usual “haven” story and launches into the stresses and strains of living in America.   Among the culture shockers—our schools:

“That doesn’t look like a school, that looks like a disco,” said Hazim as the family passed by a high school and saw girls in low-rise pants and tank tops.

But on a more serious note, this article highlights again the mixed messages we are getting about the Iraqi refugee situation.  What is the real story?  Are we concerned that terrorists will get in, or are we worried about the signal it sends to the world—that Iraq will not be safe for a long time.  Or, both?

…. the slowdown is a clause in the Patriot Act that bars immigration to anyone who has offered “material support” to the enemy.

——–

But a spokesman for the State Department said the only bureaucratic bottleneck was the lack of “infrastructure” in Jordan and Syria. With two refugee processing centers now in place, 1,000 refugees should now enter the United States each month, Kurtis Cooper said in a telephone interview earlier this month.

———

“We consider those issues to have been addressed,” he said.

———

“It’s mystifying,” said Newland [Migration Policy Institute]. The long processing times occur “partly because they are Iraqis and the U.S. is conducting a war in Iraq,” she said. “But it’s also because the government doesn’t want to concede the vast majority will not be able to go back.”

For some other interesting views on this topic see Mother Jones here.

By the way,  it is probably no surprise that California tops the nation in the number of refugees resettled from 1983-2005.   More than 20 countries are represented in the 434,348 resettled.

Iraqis “find haven” in Boise

See what did I tell you!  This is the second story today where refugees “find haven”, this one is in Idaho and the other was in Florida.   I might have lost count, but Boise, ID must be city number four in our quest to discover nine “Iraqi recieving areas” in the US.   Way back in July we reported that Rep. Sander Levin (D-MI) said there were nine cities expected to recieve Iraqi refugees in the coming year. 

So, on our Iraqi refugee hit parade we have identified five so far:   Harrisonburg, VA, Warren, MI, Denver, CO, Boise, ID, and according to this article, Spokane, WA.   The U.S. State Dept. goal is to resettle 12,000 Iraqis during FY 2008.    That should be about 1,300 Iraqis per each of nine sites. 

Unlike Hagerstown, MD,  Boise is welcoming.

Boise has become something of a magnet for refugees, in part because it has three active refugee resettlement agencies, a relatively low cost of living, lots of job opportunities and a welcoming community. Since 1980, 12,000 refugees have been resettled in Idaho, mostly in Boise. They’ve come from around the world, with large groups arriving in recent years from Bosnia, Uzbekistan and Somalia. Just in the past year, Boise has received 800 refugees from 20 countries.

Bosnia, Uzbekistan and Somalia, gee the Mosque building industry must be booming in Boise.

The Wacky United Nations

Reuters is reporting today that Palestinian Iraqi refugees in Syria have turned down a marvelous offer of asylum in none other than Sudan.   The UN High Commissioner for Refugees just can’t seem to understand why they aren’t jumping at the chance.

Sudan has offered resettlement to the refugees in al-Tanf camp. There are ongoing discussions and this is a possibility but nothing has been finalised yet,” said Dalia al-Achi, spokesperson for the UNHCR in Syria.

———

The UNHCR rejected the suggestion that Sudan – a country where four years of civil war in Darfur has displaced 2.5 million people – might be an unsuitable resettlement country.

———

“If Sudan can be a resettlement country and a safe place for these refugees, why not consider the option?” said Al-Achi.

I have just a couple of teensy-weensy questions for the United Nations.   If Sudan is safe enough for asylum seekers to find refuge there, why all the squabbling over the recent plan to halt Sudanese resettlement in Australia?  And, why has the United States taken 26,407 Sudanese refugees in recent years?

Call me crazy but I am coming to the conclusion that the folks in the immigration industry spend their days shuffling blocks of people around the world.