Bring Iraqis here or they will turn into killers

Oh brother!  Every day there are mainstream media articles throwing out arguments about why we have to bring tens of thousands (hundreds of thousands, millions) of Iraqis to America this instant.  Quick, get them here, get them on the good old American welfare system and save them from the inevitable consequences of becoming religious Islamic fanatic killers.  One gets the feeling that the refugee industry just throws out theories in hopes that one will stick.   Here is today’s from Reuters (who else!):

Islamist militancy could also take root if the crisis is allowed to spawn an underclass of poorly educated, poorly integrated Iraqi youths.

We aren’t falling for the bull poopy anymore.  I know a lot of you leftwingers fell for it with the Palestinians but all the evidence points to the fact that militant Islamists are educated middle and upper class people often with professional careers (remember the UK doctors?) and nice families.    Jihad Watch just addressed this a couple of days ago in a post entitled, “Wealthy Syrians Head to Iraq for Jihad.”   Check it out here.

How many Iraqi refugees will be resettled in Hyannisport?

In a sneaky manuever last Friday night, Senator Ted Kennedy attached the “Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act” to the National Defense Authorization bill— a bill which has fast become a Christmas tree adorned with assorted and unrelated ornaments.  No hearings, no discussion, no chance for the public to comment, no wonder Congress’ approval rating is at its lowest point in history. 

As we have previously said, the State Department has all the authority it needs to bring Iraqi refugees to our cities and towns within its annual quota for FY 2008.   In fact, just yesterday Asst. Sec. of State Ellen Sauerbrey speaking at a meeting of the UNHCR–United Nations Refugee Agency–in Geneva, Switzerland, reiterated the US position that we need to care for the refugees in the region.  As for resettlement, she said the Administration was proposing a hefty number of Iraqis be admitted to the US:

…..we have a goal of resettling 12,000 [as part of the 70,000 overall resettlement quota for the year] Iraqi refugees in 2008 for whom that durable solution is most appropriate.

Senator Kennedy’s original bill (analysis here) called for 15,000 Iraqis per year for 4 years over and above the annual overall quota.  I was told on Saturday night by Senator Sessions (R-AL) that they held the number to 5000 and that Kennedy promised his colleagues he would not increase the numbers in conferance committee (the House passed the bill without the Iraqi refugee amendment back in May).

Here are a few reasons among many for this late night manuever.  Because of security concerns the public would go ballistic if there was any real and open discussion about bringing thousands of Muslim Iraqis to America in a crisis fashion presumably with little time to scrutinize documents in countries such as Syria and Jordan.    Look out Harrisonburg, VA,  Warren, MI, and Denver, CO among other cities. 

As we have said before, while our brave men and women are dying for Iraq’s future are we willing to open our arms to Muslim Iraqis who didn’t have the guts to stay and fight for their own country?  Kennedy and his buddies at the UN have sissified the world.  How about if those “millions” of  refugees who have run to Syria went back to Iraq and threw out the insurgents?

And finally,  Senator Ted Kennedy is pushing this “crisis” bill  to send a signal to the public that the war is lost–with help from his friends in the mainstream media.   See this Time Magazine article last week with its punch line:  “US lost the war in Iraq.”   Really?  I guess if Time and Teddy say so, it must be so.

Senator Ted Kennedy is the author of the Refugee Act of 1980 which has to date brought over 2 million refugees to live in America, more than 20,000 of those are Iraqi Muslims. Gee, I wonder how many were resettled on Nantucket?  How many third-worlders are playing touch football on the lawns of Hyannisport?   Guesses anyone?

We have extensively followed the Iraqi refugee issue, go here to see our entire coverage.

End note:  Our buddies at Church World Service have been lobbying for Kennedy’s bill.

Why are we bringing Iraqis from Syria?

A reader sent me today’s Washington Post article about our “heroic” efforts to pluck Iraqi refugees out of Syria and bring them to America…..and, sent some probing questions.

“We had to literally build programs in Syria and Jordan,” said Terry Rusch, who directs the office of admissions in the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration. She added that the refugee program has “accelerated dramatically” now that resources are in place.

_____

Of the 4,300 Iraqi refugees interviewed by his department this fiscal year, he said, 753 have been rejected for reasons including criminal records and inconsistencies in their stories.

_____

The officials conceded continued difficulty in processing cases in Syria, where a number of U.S. officials have been denied entry visas.

_____

“Not only has DHS (Dept. of Homeland Security) not been able to get in to do more adjudications, but we have not been able to expand our own processing staff at the pace we would normally have done because of restrictions by the government of Syria,” Rusch said.

_____

Syria has absorbed 1.5 million Iraqi refugees — by far the most of any nation. But since September 2006, only 208 have been admitted to the United States after being processed in that country.

Here is what our reader asks:

Why are we “building programs” in an enemy country, Syria? If refugees were safe in Syria, why are we helping them? (Why were they safe?) Are we giving money to Syria for refugee camps? If so, how much?

And here is what I want to know:   If we can’t get enough of the proper personel into Syria in the first place, how are we going to adequately screen large numbers of refugees to be sure they aren’t criminals or terrorists?  

Answer?  We have completely lost it!

And, by the way, Terry Rusch (above) is the State Department representative who came to Hagerstown just this week.   The recent uproar over some proposed Burmese refugees is nothing compared to the outcry that will ensue if Shiia Iraqis from Syria were to be resettled in Hagerstown!  I’ll be selling tickets for ring side seats!

Asst. Sec. Sauerbrey — hang tough!

From a U.S. State Department press release today:

Assistant Secretary for Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM) Ellen R.
Sauerbrey has led diplomatic efforts to expand humanitarian space for UN
agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to respond to humanitarian
needs of Iraqi refugees in the region.

——

By the end of 2007, the USG will have provided almost
$1 billion in humanitarian assistance for displaced Iraqis in Iraq and
neighboring states since 2003.

We should continue to care for Iraqis displaced by the war in the region, care for their needs as best we can, and plan to return them to a stabilized Iraq.    Hang in there Asst. Secretary Sauerbrey, resist the drumbeat from those seeking to undermine the war while adding to the immigrant population of America.

Iraqis heading to the West

The United Nations said today that the number of Iraqi asylum seekers is up sharply.  The AP is reporting that 19,800 Iraqis are seeking asylum in 36 Western countries.

Sweden was the most popular destination for Iraqi asylum seekers, with nearly half of the applications filed this year in industrialized countries — 9,300 people, UNHCR said.

——

“The large Iraqi community and its strong social network in Sweden might be part of the reasons for the high concentration of Iraqi asylum seekers going to that country,” spokesman Ron Redmond said.

——

Greece was No. 2 with some 3,500 asylum requests, followed by Spain with 1,500 and Germany with 820. Only 385 Iraqis sought asylum in the United States.

Poor Sweden, see our earlier posts here and here.