The Census can’t add when it comes to certain US refugee populations

Back in December I told you how far off the Census Bureau was in calculating the Somali population in the US.  They seem unable to grasp the fact that they need only check with statistics kept by the Office of Refugee Resettlement or the Cultural Resource Orientation Center and they can at least determine the minimum number immigrants of certain ethnic groups in the US (there are also other legal and illegal ways for additional numbers of immigrants to arrive in the US).

The census bureaucrats must assume that these groups of refugees suspend child birth for decades or that thousands of resettled refugees are leaving—both ridiculous assumptions.  Maybe they are just dying off in huge numbers (someone better check that!).

This is a story from Ft. Wayne, Indiana considered by many (especially by the citizens of Ft. Wayne!) as the Burmese capital of America.  The article is about 10 days old but I didn’t get to it until now because data normally available at The Cultural Orientation Resource Center was not coming up for some reason. Today I was able to get the data.

From the Journal Gazette. What are they talking about?

Data recently released by the bureau estimated the nationwide total of Burmese to be 53,000 and suggested California has the largest population of foreign-born Burmese.

Let’s do some addition, shall we:

According to the most recent annual Report to Congress from the Office of Refugee Resettlement we resettled 16,074 Burmese from 1983-2007 (just the refugee program).  And, let me say AGAIN, the ORR is now nearly 3 years behind in releasing these LEGALLY REQUIRED documents to Congress.  However, we have another source of numbers here.

1983-2007:      16,074  Burmese arrived in US as refugees

2008:                   18,139

2009:                   18,202

2010:         +        16,693

____________________

69,108

Are we expected to believe that the Burmese population never grew and that it in fact dropped by 16,108 since 1983? (69,108 actual refugees resettled minus 53,000 the census says is here)

So I don’t get this, is the government that incompetent (perhaps relying only on who answers the door or their survey) or are they for some reason keeping the actual numbers from us?

Back to the Ft. Wayne article:

The survey estimated California’s Burma-born population to be between 18,000 and 22,000. Indiana, by contrast, was estimated to have between 1,400 and 2,600, or about a tenth of California’s Burmese population.

The survey put the Burma-born population in Allen County at 824 – a number local agencies that serve Burmese would say is almost certainly low.

Ever since we’ve been writing this blog since 2007, the number of Burmese estimated to be in Ft. Wayne has been around 5000.

Social service agencies have estimated the local Burmese refugee population at roughly 5,000 and said the concentration is the largest in the U.S.

Read the whole article at the Journal Gazette and see if you can follow the numbers!

ORR! Where is the Annual Report to Congress?

With each passing month that the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) continues to break the law and not send an Annual Report to Congress it sends a clear message— they are hiding something.  

The ORR is now two years behind having only produced Annual Reports up to fiscal year 2007, here.

This is the law:

 Section 413(a) of the Immigration and Nationalities Act states:

Sec. 413. [8 U.S.C. 1523] (a) The Secretary, shall submit a report on activities under this chapter to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate not later than the January 31 following the end of each fiscal year, beginning with fiscal year 1980.

So, in just a few weeks, on January 31st, ORR will be behind three Annual Reports.  They already have broken the law for FY 2008, FY 2009 and soon they will be due the FY 2010 report!

What are they hiding?   My guess is that they don’t want Congress and the public to know the horrible employment rate for refugees, the increasing use of public assistance and the huge amounts of tax dollars going to the program via grants and contracts to federal contractors (here are the federal contractors, called VOLAGs*) during the great recession.

*VOLAG stands for voluntary agency which is such a joke because you are paying for the resettlment programs of many religious organizations.

Readers might want to visit our ‘where to find information’ category (we have 162 posts there!) which I just now revisited for some information.  We have quite a bit of good material posted.

Bringing over the family—largest portion of legal immigration to US

CNS.News reported yesterday that who one is related to, not one’s skills or humanitarian need, is the most reliable way to get Legal Permanent Residence (LPR) status putting the “new American” on track to becoming a US citizen.   In 2009 (in a recession!) we gave LPR status to 1.1 million immigrants, 748,000 of them came as relatives to someone who got in here ahead of them. Hat tip: Ed.

Called chain migration, I’ll bet there is absolutely no DNA testing to prove that these people are related at all.

From CNS.News:

(CNSNews.com) – Foreign nationals with family ties to American citizens and green-card holders accounted for about two-thirds (748,000) of the total 1.1 million individuals who were granted legal permanent residency status by the U.S. government in 2009, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

The number of foreign nationals who became legal permanent residents (LPRs) of the U.S. in 2009 as a result of family ties (66 percent) outpaced those who became LPRs on the basis of employment skills (13 percent) and humanitarian reasons (17 percent), the CBO revealed in a December 2010 report entitled, Immigration Policy in the United States: An Update.

“People granted permanent admission to the United States are formally classified as legal permanent residents and given a green card,” noted the CBO. “LPRs are eligible to live and work in the United States, own property, and join the armed forces; eventually, they may apply for U.S. citizenship.”

An individual who becomes an LPR or U.S. citizen can then sponsor the admittance of immediate family members into the U.S.

You can readily see how the number will multiply exponentially each year.   See NumbersUSA latest video demonstration of the quantum leap in US population already underway.

Preferred categories

There are five categories under which the U.S. grants permanent residency status to foreign nationals, according to CBO. They include: relatives of U.S. citizens, family-sponsored preferences, employment-based preferences, the Diversity Program, and humanitarian reasons.

The sub-categories under family-sponsored preferences admissions include – First preference: unmarried adult sons and daughters of U.S. citizens; Second preference: spouses and dependent children of LPRs, unmarried sons and daughters of LPRs; Third preference: married sons daughters of U.S. citizens; and Fourth preference: siblings of adult U.S. citizens.

I’m puzzled why unmarried adult sons and daughters would be the highest preference category.  Is it because they are the cheap worker-bees that big business wants?

Diversity Visa

We haven’t written much about it lately, and the mainstream media virtually NEVER mentions it, but readers will be shocked to learn that we have a diversity lottery where those wishing to come to the US from certain under-represented countries, oh, like Yemen and Nigeria for instance, can come if they win the diversity lottery. Here is one story I wrote about this giant loophole in our security.   When this CBO report discusses diversity,  that’s the program they are talking about.  We take about 55,000 lottery winners each year to bring more diversity to the US! No, this is not a joke!

Almost forgot, for new readers, the family reunification program (P-3) of the Refugee Resettlement Program has been suspended for about 2 years due to the discovery of widespread fraud in Africa with mostly Somalis.   Surprise! the State Department learned that as many as 80% of the Somalis applying to bring family were not even related to each other!

I’m looking forward to reading the whole CBO report carefully and am posting this in our ‘where to find information’ category.

Office or Refugee Resettlement’s little glossy report

Just came across this ORR Year in Review report for FY2010.  I don’t know when it came out, but I’m just seeing it.  It’s small, glossy and a glowing account of the program, but I want to know where are the real reports, the ones with the cold hard numbers, the ones Congress has been waiting for.  We are now overdue on two of the legally required Annual Reports to Congress—FY2008 and FY2009 are due!   I think the ORR doesn’t want to let us know how bad it is for refugees (and cities and states) in light of the on-going economic recession.

Follow immigration and refugee issues on Capitol Hill at this website

I just yesterday learned about this website (MicEvHill.com) for news about what is happening in Washington and on Capitol Hill regarding the issues we care about here at RRW.   Note today the Dream Act could come up in the Senate but it is unlikely.   You can also track daily immigration issues and action-needed at NumbersUSA, here.

A reminder to readers: We have a category entitled, ‘where to find information,’ you might want to check it out from time to time.