Blogging is changing the rules of journalism, and it’s about time!

This article brought a smile to my face when I saw it last night in the Washington Times.   It’s about the woman who taped Obama’s now famous “bitter” comments and it’s subheading says it all:  Dividing line blurred between amateur, traditional journalists.

Mayhill Fowler is no longer an unknown California blogger. In the past 48 hours, she has generated international press coverage, a profile in the New York Times and sparked furious discussion among journalists, pundits and campaign strategists.

The enterprising Mrs. Fowler, 61, and her digital recording device are behind “Bittergate.”

It’s about time!  Those traditional (professional) journalists have been sifting the news for us for my entire lifetime (and way before that), so it gives me great joy to see the mainstream media pooh-bahs brought low. 

“This situation clearly illuminates the fact that in the citizen blogger, amateur journalism world, the rules that govern the relationship between traditional journalists and their sources are not present. A traditional newsroom would not have allowed someone who was a campaign donor to cover that candidate,” said Mark Jurkowitz of the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

Too bad, Mr. Jurkowitz. 

For the first time in my adult life, I see some hope for reforming our political system by getting the sifters of the news out of the way.   The public should be given all the facts so they can then make up their own minds about public officials or public policy.

Blogger busts — an online exclusive amplified in big media with serious repercussions — have emerged as an increasing threat to unwary public figures and a cautionary tale.

Yup!   And, as I have said on several previous occasions:  Start a blog!

RRW: a couple of housekeeping issues, new category

We have had some changes in wordpress, so if posts look less professional (mine!), it’s because I haven’t got it all sorted out.    Judy, however,  has caught on to the changes and is doing fine with them.

I just wrote another crime story involving refugees and decided we really needed a new category.   I’ve entitled it simply “crimes”, but it will include posts where refugees committed crimes as well as those where a crime was committed against a refugee.      I went back about a month and edited other posts to include this category and hopefully I can go back farther to add the “crimes” category to appropriate posts.

By the way we have written 588 posts in 27 categories since we began Refugee Resettlement Watch last July.

Jen: Assimilation is out and integration is in

The blogger’s name is Jen and she posts from Fargo, ND.   It’s pretty clear from a quick tour of her blog, Notes from the North Country, that she is a liberal political activist and refugee resettlement supporter.   Go and check out this post entitled “Integration” for a look at her views on refugee resettlement.   I found some of her comments enlightening.  First she tells us that “assimilation” is officially out.   She and the Pittsburgh student we wrote about here are reading from the same refugee lingo book.

Assimilation is no longer an official goal (that was more when we were a melting pot); the latest buzz word in refugee resettlement is “integration.” The number one goal of refugee resettlement is “early economic self-sufficiency.” Put another way, welcome to America! Get a job. Now. Seriously. Right now. And lest you think refugees get special favors, not only do they pay taxes from the get go, they also arrive in the U.S. with a debt: they must repay the U.S. for their air travel here, an interest-free loan.

Well, not exactly on that loan bit,  many don’t ever repay it and the State Department carries hundreds of millions of unpaid debt that they periodically just write-off to make the books look good.

Then she confirms that in the early days, the 1980s, refugees were resettled by individual churches.  Today it involves an assortment of taxpayer funded agencies and actors.    Does she wish it was done in the old way?  It almost sounds like it.

Even in the 1980s, most refugees in the Fargo region (most were Vietnamese) were sponsored by churches. Now there are multiple agencies, committees, and partnerships to serve the needs of refugees and to integrate them into their new society.

Here Jen gives us another look inside the mind of a refugee advocate and it comes back to our theme of recent days—gratitude and whether we (America) owe something to the world.    The Obama/preacher brouhaha has brought this to the forefront in many minds.   The best way to turn off people with whom one wishes to “integrate” is to act as if ones misfortune is all America’s fault, to insist that one is owed something and thus appear ungrateful.   In this passage Jen admits refugees are complaining.   What are they complaining about, the weather, or are the resettlement agencies falling down on the job? 

Some locals in Fargo respond to complaints by saying if newcomers aren’t grateful, then they should go back to their home countries. In most cases, the conflicts in those countries had something to do with wheelings and dealings of the U.S.

Yup, and thus we owe them.

RRW reaches a milestone! 50,000 visits!

I know, I know.  We aren’t one of the big boys, but we are happy to report we have just a few minutes ago reached our 50,000 visitors mark.   We began this blog back in July 2007 and have to date written 524 posts as part of our mission to inform and to ultimately bring about reform of legal immigration.

Our little graph which shows daily visitors by day, week, and month is climbing steadily and we hope that is an indication that we are bringing useful information to you and that visitors are returning and telling others about us.   We also hope that by challenging your thinking, even if it makes you angry sometimes, we will one day see Refugee Resettlement changed to make life better for refugees, for the communities in which they live,  always mindful of our paramount concern for the future well-being of our country.

Women Against Shariah has arrived

Our friend Janet Levy has started a blog—an important blog!  It’s called Women Against Shariah and you must read it here.  

Without a doubt one of the most puzzling aspects of the debate about the expanding Islamist agenda is the utter silence of feminists who are otherwise demanding rights for all women.  I guess if the perpetrator is some white male chauvinist pig he is fair game, but by golly they don’t say a word about the brutality some women in the world (and increasingly in America) face under Shariah law and from Muslim men.

Women Against Shariah could not come too soon.   We have a growing number of refugees and other immigrants importing to America practices which all civilized people must reject—polygamy, female genital mutilation, and even honor killings.

Go now and visit Women Against Shariah and check out the informative sidebar on the demands the Koran makes on women regarding their clothing by instructing them on how best to hide their “ornaments.”

And, if you are a blogger add this important site to your blogroll.  Congratulations Janet!