Another struggling and unhappy Iraqi refugee story

This one * is from Tucson, AZ yesterday.  This guy was an interpreter and definitely has a tough story to tell.

But, it’s the same old story regarding resettlement.  No jobs,  not enough financial support, unhappy refugee, whinny non-profit resettlement agencies looking for more public money etc., etc.    The very well-off International Rescue Committee is involved here too.   They were one of the chief lobbying organizations demanding we bring more Iraqis to the US.

What do you want to guess the salary is of the New York City-based Vice President?  It’s likely approaching $200,000.  Heck the President of this non-profit is getting close to $400,000.  (I’ve written about this so many times, I’m not looking up the link).  Maybe these guys could share some of their wealth with the less fortunate they are placing in the public’s care.  Or, maybe Mr. Carey has a guest room for Taha and his family?

The assumption is that people will find work and start becoming self-sufficient within 90 days of arrival, said Bob Carey, vice president for resettlement and migration policy with the International Rescue Committee in New York City.

“The resources of the programs, either public or private, have not kept pace with the needs of the people who are coming in,” Carey said. “What we’ve been doing is urging the State Department to review how they fund and run these programs.”

Some of the people have chronic illnesses or ailments, he said, and services are minimal. Many have to wait a long time for disability benefits to kick in, he said.

“They come over to the U.S. and not only have they gone through this trauma and hardship, they also have fairly high expectations about what will be provided to them, and it’s understandable they would,” Carey said. “They’ve been injured because of U.S. affiliations.”

The agencies and people providing these services are overwhelmed, he said, adding that the faltering economy has made it that much more difficult for people like Taha.

The solution for all these problems is never—maybe we should bring fewer refugees.

Just now I was looking through our archives for the Tucson wise-beyond-his-years Iraqi boy, and came across a post Judy did A YEAR AGO about unhappy Iraqis in Tucson.  Can’t you resettlement agencies in Tucson get it together to take care of these people?  Or, tell the State Department to send them somewhere else?

Here is what that very wise boy said in Tucson just two months ago.  If he gets it,  why can’t the State Department and the volags?

It is better to have 10 Iraqi refugees who are satisfied with their lives than having 100 angry ones with no life at all.

See our Iraqi refugee category for everything you ever wanted to know on the subject.  Soon we may need to make a subcategory for all the posts on unhappy Iraqis in the US.

* If the link doesn’t open because they want you to register try going to the link for the comments here and then go back to the story.  Sorry about that.  The article is in the Arizona Daily Star yesterday.

Another Iraqi refugee whine-fest, this time from Arab News

You know America can’t win.  First, we were a bad bad country for not bringing Iraqi refugees to the US by the tens of thousands and now we are a bad bad country because the ones getting here are not happy.  From Arab News:

WASHINGTON: With the third-largest Arab population in the US, Michigan became a popular resettlement location for Iraqi refugees. Now, many refugees who arrived here say they were unable to navigate the system, and make this country their home. It is one of many unintended consequences of the Iraq War, now in its sixth year.

Lobbyists for the refugee industry, like this guy Jake Kurtzer and the AP reporter Matthew Lee, who has done the bidding of that industry for over a year,  have used the refugees as a club to beat the Bush Administration around the head over the war.  I have seen nothing from them to suggest they are working for the best interests of the displaced Iraqis.

“They (the Bush administration) have basically tried to do as little as possible,” said Jake Kurtzer, congressional advocate [LOBBYIST] for Refugees International, a Washington-based advocacy [LOBBYING] organization. Two years ago, only 202 Iraqi refugees were allowed into the country. This year, that number is almost 14,000 — and most refugees have gravitated to Detroit, home to America’s largest Arab population as well as a sizable Iraqi Christian or Chaldean community. But now officials say they’re swamped. For Iraqi refugees who make it to the US, the American dream is often not what they hoped.

While it’s meant safety and often better pay for low-income refugees, it has proven to be unacceptable for many well-paid Iraqis, at least so far. Language barriers and a job market seemingly limited to menial jobs are major frustrations.

A disappointing welcome for those who dreamed that coming to American would end their nightmares.

All of the lobbyists could have put their heads together and come up with plans to return these formerly “well-paid” Muslim Iraqis to Iraq to help rebuild the free Muslim country we gave them.    There could have been ‘Marshall plan’ like efforts (in conjunction with the Iraqi government) on a large scale to get new homes built, perhaps even with security perimeters for now.  In the meantime they should have been lobbying for the best and brightest to be cared for in whatever country they were displaced to until they return HOME.   Instead, these refugee industry lobbyists have promoted bringing them to the US, for what?  Jobs cleaning motels!  

And, who gave these Iraqis high expectations of life in America?  Is someone or some agency abroad trying to coerce them to get on the plane?  Why?

Once in the US, for example, refugees must over time reimburse the US government for the cost of their plane ticket, usually well in excess of $1,000*. Though some are given small stipends, they lament that they start life in the US already in debt. In the US, many new arrivals say life hasn’t improved much. Many subsist on food stamps, housing supplied by refugee services, and get whatever medical care they need from Medicaid. “As they move to this country, sometimes expectations may not exactly match the reality here,” says Joseph Roberson, director of Church World Service’s Immigration and Refugee Program. And that’s the officials’ main worry. The immediate resettlement – finding a house, giving three months’ worth of cash assistance – is the easy part.

The hard part [no kidding!] comes afterward, when the money has run out, the economy is still bad and affordable housing is hard to come by.

Honest to God, I don’t think these professional resettlement contractors (“church” people) really like the human beings they bring to America.  It is all about politics and taxpayer money to keep their operations going.

If you go to our Iraqi refugee category (260 posts to date!) you will see one story after another in recent months about the unhappy Iraqi refugees resettled here, not just in impoverished Michigan, but throughout the US.

*  On this repayment of airfare, these volags (non-profit federal contractors) act as collection agents and get a cut of every airfare dollar they collect from the struggling refugee, thus they receive additional taxpayer dollars on top of their per-head payment for each refugee.    You know what a State Dept. official told me once?   We would need to hire a collection agency to get our airfare loan money back anyway, so we might as well pay the volags the going rate for collection services.  It is a racket!

Two Iraqi Christian girls murdered in their home in Mosul

And, surprise, no mention of this that I can see at the UNHCR website.   The persecution and murder of Christians in Iraq goes on while the UN High Commissioner for Refugees continues news story after news story about the “persecuted” Iraqi Palestinians.

This is from the Asia News:

Mosul (AsiaNews) – Mosul Christians have been attacked again today. A group of armed men stormed a house in the Alqahira neighbourhood where they killed two sisters in what amounts to targeting killing. After entering the building the gunmen shot the two young women in cold blood and wounded their mother with a knife. At present she is in hospital but her conditions are not serious. The husband and the son were able to escape at the start of the attack.

[…] 

A source told AsiaNews that “youth gangs from poor families” were involved in the incident but that behind them there is “a criminal organisation” that is doing everything to drive Christians out of the city.

However, the UNHCR puts out international press releases about the rain in Palestinian camps on the Iraq Syria border.  And, the death of one Palestinian child accidentally run over by a truck “highlights” the tragedy of the Iraqi Palestinians.

What about the tragedy when Muslim terrorists kill girls in their homes?   Doesn’t that warrant an international press release?   Urghhhh!

Asia News wraps up its story with this:

In recent days more than 700 families had decided to come back to Mosul after local authorities promised to provide them with greater protection. This targeted killing “will push Christians to flee again” and threats of new attacks and violence will continue to hang over the few who remain.

NY Times parody includes editorial about Iraqi refugees

Just to show that RRW hasn’t become Somali Watch, I’ll put up a couple of posts on other refugee issues this morning before I get back to a slew of Somali stories.    Check out Radosh.net about the parody of the New York Times that was actually handed out in a couple of cities this week.

After eight years of the Onion and the Daily Show and Colbert and too many books and blogs to name, the old saw that liberals had no sense of humor had finally been banished. And then today, in the first big humor statement of the Obama era, the Yes Men produce a New York Times parody that actually parodies nothing but — quite unintentionally — dreary socialist agitprop.

The ‘parody’ includes an editorial about Iraqi refugees that includes all the talking points of the refugee industry, and I see nothing funny in it.   See what you think.

Iraqi Palestinians going to Sweden (via India)

The Iraqi Palestinians are apparently favored by the United Nations which doesn’t seem to have the same passion for resettling the Iraqi Christians, at least not that we hear.    Now, here is news that the UNHCR has arranged for this group of Palestinians, driven out of Iraq and given a safe haven in India, to be resettled in Sweden.

In case you are wondering why Muslims should turn on other Muslims, articles like this one never tell you the full story of why the Iraqi Palestinians are persecuted in Iraq.  It was because they were favored by Saddam Hussein and when he met his end, those who had been persecuted by him turned their anger on his favorites.

NEW DELHI, India, November 11 (UNHCR) – More than 100 Palestinian refugees from Iraq are leaving India in the first large-scale resettlement of Palestinian refugees from outside the Middle East.

A total of 137 Palestinian refugees who fled Baghdad for India have been accepted for resettlement by Sweden. So far, 91 have left for Sweden; the rest are due to leave in the next six months. Another 10 left for Norway earlier this year.

Within the community, the mood today is noticeably different from before. Back in Iraq, like other Palestinians after the regime change of 2003, they had been targeted and persecuted. Kidnappings were routine, as were midnight knocks on the door in Palestinian homes. Their shops were torched, their homes looted and bombed. They fled terror and the first groups reached India in March 2006.

This group was lucky, they got to India.  Others are living in miserable camps on the border of Iraq and Syria.  Syria won’t let them in.  Neither will any other Muslim country.  Why?   Well, this article which I meant to post a few days ago, tells us why.

As we have seen in the past, the Iraqi refugees of Palestinian Arab origin are symbolic of the hatred that the Arab world has for Palestinian Arabs. The UNHCR has tried mightily for years to find permanent homes for these people, kicked out of Iraq, but no Arab country (save for a cynical Sudan) has offered to help.

The only countries that do help – Canada, Iceland, Chile and a few others – are vilified by Arabs who pretend to care about their Palestinian brethren, and the reason is clear: to them, “resettlement” means that the refugees will no longer be pawns in the gigantic game of pressuring Israel. Every Palestinian Arab who no longer sits in stateless misery is one less bullet against Israel. The very idea of Palestinian Arabs becoming full citizens of Arab countries is treated as blasphemy, an idea that the UNRWA tried to push in the 1950s but was so violently rebuffed that it became the largest perpetuator of PalArab pain in the guise of gigantic, ever growing “refugee camps.”

And the only people that get hurt are Palestinian Arabs themselves. The Arab world congratulates itself on maintaining “Palestinian unity” but it is just a code word for Palestinian Arab misery.

Frankly, there is no other reasonable explanation for why rich countries like Saudi Arabia won’t take in their fellow Arab Muslims, and no one seems to have the guts to tell them to do their duty.  Where is the famous Muslim charity we hear about?

Now, back to the Palestinians headed to Sweden.  I thought this was a revealing comment.  

What the Palestinians lacked in India was a sense of belonging. Perhaps more than any other community, they long for a homeland, a country to call their own. Resettlement gives them that opportunity. “We dream of Sweden…”

Sweden will be a country of their own?   A homeland?  Really?  Do they know something we don’t know?