Immigration lawyers out of work! Hurry up with CIR!

Yes, hurry up Congress and pass Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) so we can put all those under-employed immigration lawyers back to work.  Oh brother!

From Immigration Daily:

The economic downturn has hit immigration lawyers across the country badly. One of the indications of the depressed conditions for immigration attorneys is the state of this year’s H-1B quota. We discuss our quota forecast below and then make general observations about the immigration law business today.

By the way the H-1B visas are the ones that bring educated immigrants into the country to compete with your recently graduated college student—the one that just cost you a small fortune to educate and who is back in the basement unemployed. 

Read on and weep for those immigration lawyers.  But there is hope.  Comprehensive Immigration Reform should bring business back and remember Pelosi and Obama are fighting the good fight to keep lawyers in work.

It is entirely possible that the dim economic conditions may continue for many more months, until CIR, or economic recovery, whichever comes earlier. CIR, when it comes, is likely to change the fundamental shape of the immigration law field….

[……]

Recent statements by President Obama, Rep. Pelosi and Sen. Reid extolling immigration and decrying the view that immigration is primarily about enforcement could not have come at a better time. CIR cannot come fast enough.

Was it only last summer I told you that the immigration law field was booming?  My, my how times have changed!

Center for Immigration Studies confirms immigrant employment depresses wages at meatpacking plants

A new study out yesterday from the Center for Immigration Studies confirms that immigrant labor keeps wages low in the meatpacking industry.  The primary thrust of the study by Jerry Krammer was illegal immigration labor, but it discusses the recruitment of refugees by companies like Swift & Co. and Tyson Foods after illegal immigration raids had initially reduced their workforce.

This is a paragraph from the conclusion:

Of course, meatpacking is intrinsically unpleasant and difficult and this has always has been the case. But there is no question that the jobs paid a great deal more a generation ago when the vast majority of workers were native-born. There is also no question that as the foreign born share of this workforce has increased, wages have fallen significantly. The desirability of any job is heavily dependent on compensation. If the United States adopted a different immigration policy, one that reduced the number of less-educated immigrants entering the country, then it is very possible that wages and benefits would increase and line speeds might slow as Swift and other companies adapted to a change in the supply of labor.

I urge you to read the whole report and consider the following points that jumped out at me.

* High turnover imposes severe stress on local communities and social service agencies. It makes transience and upheaval a constant problem for the communities. Many residents resent the price their community pays to have the Swift plant as a large part of their local economy.

We have written so extensively about disrupted communities that we have whole categories for some towns.  See our categories for Emporia, KS, and for Greeley/Grand Island.  Use our search function for Shelbyville, TN and Postville, IA.

For those of you wondering how meatpackers get refugees so quickly, they offer signing bonuses among other enticements.

* In addition to pay increases, Swift introduced a number of methods to attract workers after the raids. The company paid bonuses to new employees, and to current employees who recruited others. It also advertised heavily, paid relocation expenses, and provided daily transportation from distant population centers.

And this is for all the do-gooders bringing refugees into the country and signing them up with meatpackers.

*All the Swift plants began drawing more refugees — especially from Burma and several African countries — who had been living elsewhere in the United States. These most recent refugees have allowed Swift and other meat processors to sustain working conditions not tolerable to many U.S.-born workers.

The CIS report reminded me of a post I did last May in which I speculated that the US State Department/Health and Human Services and the volags were acting as employment agencies for big meatpackers.

The US State Department is helping big companies by bringing cheap LEGAL labor through the refugee program couched as humanitarian work. Clinton was heavily involved in importing what amounts to slave labor all to help the meatpackers not have to pay decent wages to American citizens. Church groups are helping too!

This is what led me to that conclusion from a 2001 report in a publication called Agribusiness Examiner.   

“And IBP’s [Tyson Food bought IBP in 2002] good fortune didn’t end there,” Limbacher continues, “turns out the Clinton administration’s Bosnian refugee resettlement efforts also helped to keep labor costs down. Since 1995, for instance, the town of Waterloo, Iowa — population 65,000 – has been swamped with 6,000 Bosnian refugees, many of whom wound up working for the No. 1 local employer, IBP.”

Until recently, IBP’s 2,000-strong Waterloo workforce was one-third Bosnian. Most refugee families that settle there have a family member who at one time or another worked for the meatpacking giant. In fact, the meatpacking industry has a history of recruiting on the ground in Yugoslavia. But during the Clinton years, companies like IBP haven’t had to travel that far.

Since 1995, the Clinton INS has resettled over 80,000 Balkan refugees, mainly Bosnian Muslims, primarily in America’s Midwest. The immigrant deluge has earned Iowa the distinction of being the only state in the union with its own refugee bureau.

Come to think of it, wasn’t Lavinia (whoop-de-do) Limon of the US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants Bill Clinton’s head of the Office of Refugee Resettlement in those years?   The door doth revolve.

And, wasn’t there some big scandal with the Clinton’s and Tyson Foods some years ago?  I’m sure whatever it was, it benefited the poor downtrodden immigrant workers.

Joe defiant: “I am not going to be intimidated by the politics and by the Justice Department”

I told you not long ago that the Obama Administration would be coming after Joe—Joe Arpaio, the successful sheriff of Maricopa County in Arizona.    The open borders crowd, using Alinsky’s rule 13, have gone after Sheriff Arpaio and thus all of the rest of us who believe that out-of-control immigration is killing America.

From US News and World Report in an article entitled: “Obama’s line in the sand on immigration enforcement.”

Civil rights leaders and immigration reform advocates met in Washington yesterday to applaud the announcement that Joe Arpaio, the publicity-seeking sheriff whose immigration sweeps and harsh treatment of prisoners in Arizona’s Maricopa County have raised eyebrows at both ends of the political spectrum, is now the subject of a Department of Justice investigation.

Arpaio received a letter earlier this week from the office of the U.S. attorney general informing him that his department, which polices a broad area including Phoenix and its suburbs, was being investigated for suspected civil rights violations, including “discriminatory police practices and unconstitutional searches and seizures … [as well as] allegations of national origin discrimination.”

According to civil rights experts, the investigation, one of the few times the government has ever conducted a civil rights investigation into a local police agency’s immigration enforcement practices, could be a sign of things to come, as the Obama administration moves toward more comprehensive immigration reform.

Read it all, and then stand up for Joe!

The New York Times is of some use after all: great tools to see immigration and diversity trends

The New York Times web site has some fascinating interactive graphics about diversity and immigration. On this one, you can see how the ethnic/racial composition of schools has changed from 1987 to 2006. You can look up figures by state county and school district, and these are compared with national trends. The site says:

Immigration’s impact is often first seen in the classroom. The increasing diversity of the nation’s education system is the most detailed measure of where immigrants have settled in recent years. View demographic changes in more than 17,000 school districts across the nation — including your own.

The general trend is this:

Fueled by the latest wave of immigration, enrollment of Hispanic and Asian students in American schools has increased by more than 5 million since the 1990s. The increases are occurring not just in long-time immigration hotbeds, but in places as far flung as Sevier County, Arkansas to Colfax County, Nebraska, to Marion County, Oregon.

Asians increased from 5 to 6 percent; Hispanics from 13 to 21 percent over the period. Blacks and Native Americans remained the same, at 17 percent and 1 percent respectively, and whites dropped from 66 to 56 percent. This represents students, remember, so the minority figures are larger than in the general population.

On that page there is a link to this amazing map of immigration trends by nationality.  You  can run your cursor over any county and see the total population and the number of foreign-born. The counties are coded by color to show where most of the foreign-born are from.

Even better, there’s a timeline that runs from 1880 to 2000. You can select a nationality and move the pointer along the timeline to see what each census showed of that nationality’s settlement. Even this is at the county level, so you can learn, for instance, that in 1890 in Douglas County, Nebraska, there were 260 French-born people out of a total population of 158,008.

Mexicans protesting influx of American immigrants to their country

Yes, you heard that right.  Thanks to reader Ciccio for sending us a story from WFAA-TV  Dallas/Ft. Worth that brought tears (of laughter) to my eyes.   Mexicans are afraid Americans will undermine their culture and refuse to learn their language as they emigrate in increasing numbers to Mexico.

Not everyone is rolling out the welcome mat to Americans. Many Mexicans complain about the rapid growth of the American population in their neighborhoods, the threat they see to Mexican culture and language, and the possible drain on Mexico’s inexpensive health care.

In San Miguel de Allende, the group Basta Ya is protesting the erosion of the language and the rising cost of living generated by the infusion of dollars into the local economy.

“They think Mexico, especially San Miguel de Allende, is an extension of their country,” group member Arturo Morales Tirado said of the Americans who call San Miguel home. “It’s not and won’t be, no way.”

Read the whole story here.