An honor killing in America twenty years ago!

Who knew?  I was amazed to see this little nugget in the Washington Examiner yesterday.  I bet I’m not alone in thinking that Muslim honor killings are a recent phenomenon in the US.  Wrong!  Here, in 1991, the parents were given a death sentence for killing a teenager who became too Americanized.

We’ve written a bunch about honor killings; you can find previous posts by searching ‘honor killing’ or you might want to check out our ‘women’s issues’ category, here.

From the Washington Examiner:

On this day, Dec. 20, in 1991, a Missouri court sentences the Palestinian militant Zein Isa and his wife Maria to death for the honor killing of their daughter.

The FBI planted listening devices in the family’s St. Louis apartment hoping to hear evidence of terrorist activities.

Instead, what the agents heard were the screams of 16-year-old Palestina being stabbed to death as her father yelled in Arabic, “Die quickly!”

The parents were unhappy that they could not control Palestina, who had taken a part-time job without their permission and was dating a black teenager.

Zein Isa died of diabetes in prison in 1997. Maria’s death sentence was commuted to life in prison.

Also interesting is the news that the FBI was investigating Islamic terrorists in 1991.  Guess they didn’t do such a great job investigating since the first highly visible terror attack on the US came just two years later—-the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

Hudson Institute: Honor crimes and polygamous marriages on the rise in Great Britain

Author Soeren Kern at the Hudson Institute this week writes about two recent reports that do not bode well for Muslim women in the UK or frankly for the future of women’s rights generally as the Muslim population in Europe (and a demand for Sharia law) increases with the rising immigrant tide.

From Hudson New York:

More than 2,800 so-called honor attacks — punishments for bringing shame on the family — were recorded by British police last year, according to the first-ever national estimate of the problem.

The highest number of honor crimes — which include murder, mutilation, beatings, abductions and acid attacks — was recorded in London, where the problem has doubled to more than five times the national average.

Still, although the statistics provide the best national estimate so far, they do not give the full picture of the levels of honor violence in Britain. The real figure could be five times as high and in any case shows that Muslim parallel societies are now firmly established in Britain, thanks to decades-long multicultural immigration policies in the country.

The data on honor violence in Britain was released on December 3 by the London-based Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organization (IKWRO), a registered charity that provides advice to Muslim women and girls living in the United Kingdom, who are facing forced marriage, honor-based violence, female genital mutilation and domestic abuse.

Polygamous marriages also hurt women and taxpayers!

The data [about honor crimes] comes on the heels of another report which shows that tens of thousands of Muslim immigrants in Britain are practicing bigamy or polygamy to collect bigger social welfare payments from the British state.

The September 24 report shows that the phenomenon of bigamy and polygamy — which is permitted by Islamic Sharia law — is far more widespread in Britain than previously believed, even though it is a crime there, punishable by up to seven years in prison.

The rapid growth in multiple marriages is being fueled by multicultural policies that grant special rights to Muslim immigrants who demand that Sharia law be reflected in British law and the social welfare benefits system.

The report quotes two senior social welfare experts based in Lancashire (one of the most “multicultural” areas in Britain) who estimate that there are now at least 20,000 bigamous or polygamous Muslim unions in England and Wales. This would imply that around 300,000 people are living in polygamous families in Britain if the average size of such a “family” is 15 people.

The multiple marriages are encouraged by recent changes to the British welfare system, which allows Muslim immigrants to have a second, third or fourth wife (or in some cases five or more) treated as a single mother who can get a house and an array of other state payments for herself and her children.

The report shows how Muslim men can take a new spouse from anywhere in the world, father any number of children with her, and have British taxpayers assume responsibility for this family’s upkeep and care.

Although all marriages that take place in the United Kingdom must be monogamous, Muslim immigrants can employ countless evasions to practice polygamy without running afoul of British matrimony laws.

In the US, refugee resettlement workers know full well (and whisper among themselves) that some Muslim refugees are polygamous with the second wives (third?) living nearby and collecting public assistance.  Honor crimes and female genital mutilation are also here already.

Rape wave in Norway by Muslims blamed on Israel!

Say what?

From the Israeli National News Service:

Norway is suffering from an unprecedented wave of rapes that are largely being perpetrated by Muslim immigrants against local women, according to Yehuda Bello, an acclaimed Israeli blogger whose special interests include Norway.

[…..]

Bello notes that Norway is “the most advanced country in the world in granting rights to women.” However, he adds, the “politically correct rot” prevents the rape wave by Muslims from being reported. “They are called ‘non-western,’ ‘dark skinned,’ ‘Middle Eastern’ et cetera.”

After a police report in Oslo said that Muslims were raping Norwegian women out of a religious conviction that this was the proper thing to do, a stormy public debate erupted, reports Bello, and “the government ministers, most of them avowed anti-Semites, claimed that the report and its publication serve Israel and its policy of occupation.”

Meanwhile, Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik has been ruled “insane” which means that he will be quietly put away in a psychiatric institution without the public trial he was looking for.  As for that charge of anti-semitism against Norwegian government officials, remember the kids at the camp were learning  political tactics to support the Palestinians against the Israelis, here.

No sympathy for the Catholic Bishops

The whining continues from the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) about being cut out of the federal largess via those lucrative Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) human trafficking grants awarded at the start of the new fiscal year.

I told you about the controversy, here, two days ago.   The USCCB is saying those secular agencies that did get the millions of taxpayer dollars have no experience in the field, AND that the ORR was responding in advance because the ACLU had filed suit claiming the Catholic agencies weren’t offering the “full range of reproductive services” (code of course for birth control and abortion).   On whose side did you think the Obama Administration would be?

From Catholic Culture:

The director of media relations of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops is charging that the new recipients of a federal grant to assist victims of human trafficking lack experience.

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement declined to renew a grant to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Migration and Refugee Services (MRS) to aid victims of human trafficking–likely because of the agency’s refusal to offer trafficking victims a “full range of reproductive services.” MRS has assisted 2,700 victims since 2006.

Bishops, when you take money from government it’s a form of sleeping with the devil and, if you have a conscience, the consequences are usually not happy ones in the long run.  There is no law against helping victims of trafficking all by yourself you know!

Catholic Bishops lose anti-trafficking grant, blame it on their anti-abortion stance

Update October 14th:  More boohooing from the Bishops on losing some of their cut of your money, here.  And, more here!

According to Catholic News Service the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has lost a LUCRATIVE federal grant for their CHARITABLE WORK to help victims of human trafficking.

WASHINGTON (CNS) — Since 2006, the U.S. Catholic bishops’ Migration and Refugee Services has helped more than 2,700 victims of human trafficking obtain food, clothing and access to medical care.

That service came to an abrupt halt when the agency recently learned that it would no longer receive a federal grant for this work from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement.

MRS officials had no immediate comment on the contract’s discontinuation.

Mercy Sister Mary Ann Walsh, director of media relations for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, told Catholic News Service Oct. 11 that she hoped the Catholic Church’s “position against abortion, sterilization and artificial contraception has not entered into this decision, especially since this administration has said it stands fully behind freedom of conscience.”

She noted that the MRS’s anti-trafficking program “ran quite well without these services” and said it would be “tragic if abortion politics harmed the men, women and children already at risk because of the crime and scandal of human trafficking.”

$5 Million dollars per year per group!

Three groups were awarded federal grants for anti-trafficking programs. The groups are Tapestri, based in Atlanta, Heartland Human Care Services in Chicago and the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants based in Washington. The groups have each been awarded $5 million contracts per year with the possibility of adding two additional years.

By the way there are critics of this program who contend this is just one more racket for non-profits to get taxpayer dollars, that there aren’t even that many people being trafficked in the US!  But, that is a story for another time.

Here is an idea for the Catholic Bishops!

Maybe if you did your charitable good works WITHOUT A FEDERAL GRANT then the federal government would in no way have its hooks in you, your conscience and your good people.   Wasn’t there something I recall from the old days—something about Caesar and taxes and not mixing government and God—who said that?  Of course, rendering unto Caesar was about paying taxes, but I suspect that the church taking peoples’ money indirectly by taking taxes from the unwilling might be viewed similarly.

New readers should know that the US Conference of Catholic Bishops gets many millions of dollars from taxpayers every year and then uses the money, not just for refugees, but to promote their many political agenda items.  Here is just one of many posts on the subject.