AP reports stepped-up attention to European political extremes, but Islamic terror still greatest threat

Update (well, sort of, but one more in what surely will be a main topic of discussion for the remainder of the decade as evidenced by the many comments):  From Delingpole at The Telegraph.   I’m henceforth stealing a phrase from one of the commenters used to describe the “good” people—the “caring class.”

Here is a report from the Associated Press, one of probably thousands out there today and into the future, with more points on the horrific shooting in Norway on Friday.   They say Norway’s refugee influx blamed for growing anti-immigration sentiment in the country.

AP (emphasis mine):

LONDON (AP) — In the wake of Norway’s terrorist attack, the European police agency is setting up a task force of more than 50 experts to help investigate non-Islamist threats in Scandinavian countries, its spokesman told The Associated Press on Saturday.

Soeren Pedersen said the group, based in The Hague, hopes to help Norway in the coming weeks and to aid other countries such as Denmark, Finland and Sweden in assessing non-Islamist threats. Norway has not yet requested forensic experts but Europol stands ready to assist, Pedersen said.

“There is no doubt that the threat from Islamist terrorism is still valid,” he said, adding that the task force could be expanded in the future to include even more European nations. “But there have actually been warnings that (right-wing groups) are getting more professional, more aggressive in the way they attract others to their cause.”

Anti-immigration sentiment on the rise, but Islamic jihadism still the big worry.

Anti-immigrant sentiment has grown in Norway as tensions rose over its policy of taking in conflict refugees.

In the 1990s, it welcomed immigrants from the Balkans. Years later, it opened its doors to large numbers of Iraqi refugees. The Norwegian government has said it expects some 15,000 new arrivals this year, many from Iraq, Afghanistan, Eritrea and Somalia.*  [15,000 is a huge number in a welfare state like Norway, the US this year may see around 60,000 (although our goal for the year is 80,000, stepped-up security checks have slowed the flow)—ed]

Europe has seen an overall increase in xenophobia, boosting the ranks of ultranationalists and fueling their activity. Still, experts and officials across Europe say the main terror threat hovering over the continent remains Islamic jihadism. They suggest that the overall danger posed by European political extremists, both from left and right, is relatively small — but that anybody with the will and the means has a chance of wreaking devastation.

“This horrendous event in Norway is sobering because it shows how easy it is to cause havoc,” a British government official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss security matters. “But you have to decide what the threat is. In the UK, extreme right and left wing groups aren’t perceived as big national security threats.”

I’m wondering if Norway will change its gun policies now—I, like many of you, have contemplated how different things might have been had there been an armed security guard, or an official at that camp with a gun.   The murderer might not have been able to walk around for over an hour shooting at will.  And, I guess you are all well aware of the fact that there is no death penalty in Europe so he won’t so easily be wiped from the public mind as Timothy McVeigh has been.

Back to AP:

The numbers also indicate a low terror threat from ultrarightists.

In a report earlier this year, Europol said there had been no rightwing terror attacks in Europe last year. But there were 45 leftwing and anarchist attacks in 2010.

The New York Times had this chilling paragraph in one of many stories yesterday:

Organized by the youth wing of the ruling Labor Party, the camp has become a kind of multicultural incubator in recent years. Many of the victims in Friday’s shooting were the children of immigrants from Africa and Asia who have begun to stake out a greater role for themselves in Norwegian society.

I don’t know what to say in conclusion, but that this evil killer has succeeded in changing the dynamics of Norwegian (home of the Peace Prize) politics probably for the remainder of the century.   I make no predictions on what it all means, nor could I even begin to guess in what direction Europe and the West will go as a result.

* Those refugees will be primarily Muslims.

Islamists attack Norway (wrong!)

……killer was opposed to Muslim immigration and Marxism it seems.

Update July 23:  As death toll rises, New York Times says gunman was Christian fundamentalist, here.  More when I have time later.

AP says:

Norwegian news agency NTB said the suspect wrote a 1,500-page manifesto before the attack in which he attacked multiculturalism and Muslim immigration.

Reuters says:

The man suspected of Norway’s gun and bomb massacre had belonged to an anti-immigration party and opposed multi-culturalism, Islam and the “cultural Marxists” of the establishment, web postings, acquaintances and officials said Saturday.

Update (#2 on July 22nd):  Reuters reports speculation that a rightwinger angry about immigration did it .  We’ll have to wait until tomorrow (or whenever) to get the real story.

NUPI political think tank Senior Research Fellow Jakub Godzimirski said he suspected a right-winger more than a militant Islamist attack. Right wing groups have grown up around the issue of immigration in Norway.

Update July 22nd: from Jihad Watch, I’m wrong, most everyone was wrong….

At last, some apparently definitive information. After a jihad group curiously claimed responsibility and retracted, and after some terror experts said it was a jihad attack and some said it wasn’t, and after the media pointed to jihadists as essentially the only ones with a motive, and Islamic supremacists applauded the attack, it appears that it was not a jihad attack after all. “Norway Camp Shooting: ‘As Many As 30 Dead,'” from Sky News, July 22 (read on).

For complete news on Muslim immigration and European Islamists (especially in Scandinavia) always visit Gates of Vienna first. Here is the terrible news from Oslo.

Fjordman (at 11:41 a.m.):

“The most suicidal and cowardly government in a country with no colonial history was just attacked. How do you explain that as a response to Western ‘aggression’?”

We have written about Norway and Muslim immigration there on several occasions.  Just type “Norway” into our search function.

North African refugees on NATO ship turned away by both Italy and Malta

Update July 18th:  “Refugees” European goal thwarted as they are sent to camps in Tunisia, hat tip Charles.

Malta dug in its heels and refused the warship entry, insisting the rescue had taken place closer to the other countries and that they should therefore have been transferred there.

Just so readers don’t forget that thousands of North Africans are (still) attempting to escape the joyous Arab Spring (Summer etc. etc) and get the heck to civilization in Europe, here is a short story about both Italy and Malta turning away a NATO ship which rescued just over 100 “refugees” from Obama’s Libyan war.

Over 100 African refugees from Libya rescued in the Mediterranean by a Spanish NATO ship four days ago have been refused shelter by Italy and Malta and are stranded at sea, officials said on Friday.

The ship was taking part in the naval blockade on Libya when it came across a battered boat crammed with “around 105 immigrants from North Africa,” said David Taylor, spokesman for NATO’s Allied Maritime Command in Naples.

Italian news agency ANSA identified the boat as Spain’s “Almirante Juan de Borbon” and said it had intercepted the fishing boat with 17 women — four of them pregnant — and eight children on board about 100 miles off Libya.

Italy has said its centres are already stretched by other refugees fleeing the conflict in Libya and does not have space for new arrivals, while Malta has said the Almirante is too far away and therefore not its responsibility, the report said.

Malta’s Interior Minister Carmelo Mifsud Monnici called on NATO Thursday to resolve the issue after the Almirante brought its human cargo towards Valletta only to be refused permission to enter Maltese waters.

[…..]

He said the refugee boat had been intercepted 141 miles off Malta.

“The problem is certainly NATO’s not ours, and it’s up to them to resolve it,” he said.

Hey, here is an idea, maybe they can just send them to South Africa, the Rainbow Nation, with its “welcoming” Constitution which will guarantee them all their rights whether legally or illegally in the country.

Another African immigrant fraud story

This one is from the UK and it’s about Nigerian Bimbo—no I am not calling her Bimbo, that is her name.  Last week it was the hustler from Guinea here who claimed the DSK raped her back in May.

Read all about Bimbo Abeyalabola, here. (Hat tip: Paul)  They call this birth tourism—go to a western country for vacation just as you near your due date!

Remember our friend Bimbo Abeyalabola of Nigeria, who came on a visitor’s visa to Britain expressly in order to give birth to her quintuplets, which cost the state £200,000, and now is appealing to the government to let her stay in Britain because it would be a hardship for her to return to Nigeria?

She had claimed to be single and almost penniless.

She had told an interviewer, “If I go back [to Nigeria] I’ll be on my own without even a roof over my head.”

Guess what? It turns out she’s married to a well-to-do Nigerian businessman.

Read on.   Stories like these are why it becomes so difficult to believe asylum seekers stories from Africa.

African immigrants bringing HIV to Malta

In response to my post last night about HIV in the refugee population in the US, reader Charles sent us this story from the Earth Times about Malta.

Valletta, Malta – Half of the HIV cases being treated in Malta involve African immigrants, who make up just one per cent of the population, the island’s main newspaper revealed Sunday. New HIV-positive cases in the EU’s smallest state have quadrupled – from between seven and 10 cases a year to about 30 to 40 – in the past two to three years, coinciding with increases in the number of illegal immigrant landings, The Sunday Times reported.

The statistics are expected to continue fuelling the anti- immigration sentiment sweeping Malta.

Read it all.

New readers, type ‘Malta’ into our search function. We have dozens of posts about how the US State Department is bringing Malta’s illegal aliens to the US.