Fraud Digest, very cool site

Maybe you heard yesterday that the Feds had busted Medicare fraud schemes in three cities, Detroit, Miami and Brooklyn, totaling about $60 million in taxpayer rip-offs.

But, since the mainstream media seems generally unwilling to name names when one of these busts occur, especially when they are busts of immigrant run home health care operations (you know, something the SEIU is really into), I found this cool site.  Apparently they run a continuous blog-like list of fraud information.   So, I couldn’t find a permanent link for the December 16th entry, but at the moment it’s at the top of the page, here.

On December 15, 2009, the Justice Department announced that thirty people had been charged in three cities for their alleged roles in schemes to submit more than $61 million in false Medicare claims as part of the continuing operation of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force.

Here are some of the names from Miami:

Yudel Cayro

Courtesy Medical Group
Lissbet Diaz
Fred Dweck
Marlenys Fernandez
Alain Fernandez
Arturo Fonseca
Teresita Leal
William Madrigal
Antonio Ochoa
Francisco Portillo
Eduardo Romero
Shelilah Rotta
Silvio Ruiz
Armando Sanchez
Isis Torres

That reminds me, since we were just hearing about Somalis in Lewiston, ME a few hours ago here, most readers probably don’t know that Lewiston had a Somali home health care bust back in the summer here.

And, aren’t you glad that the Obama Administration is cracking down on Medicare fraud even when the alleged perpetrators are immigrants?

Obama: Get tough on criminal aliens and maybe get Amnesty passed

I’m such a cynic.  Obama didn’t really say that, but that is the first thing I thought of when I saw this Wall Street Journal article by Miriam Jordan.   I should be applauding the administration for getting tough and not look for hidden motives.   But, you can bet they know that every time an immigrant commits murder, or rapes someone, or is convicted for a DUI, or invades a home, the chances for amnesty for illegal aliens passing the Congress diminishes.  So arrests have been stepped up in advance of the push that begins this week in Congress. 

Immigration agents arrested nearly 300 foreign nationals with criminal records, most of them suspected illegal immigrants, in the largest such crackdown ever conducted by federal authorities.

The operation, carried out in California over three days and spearheaded by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, underscores the Obama administration’s increased focus on arresting and deporting foreigners who have criminal records rather than those just living and working in the U.S. illegally.

The statewide operation, which ended late Thursday, involved more than 400 agents of ICE, a division of the Department of Homeland Security. Among those arrested, more than 200 were previously convicted in the U.S. of rape, armed robbery and other serious crimes, but were at large.

ICE chief John Morton told a news conference Friday that the effort is a “direct reflection” of the new government priority designed “to remove from our streets criminals who don’t have the right to be here in the first place.”

O.K., so now what?  Are they shipped back across the border only to return again? The article doesn’t tell us what is going to happen with those recent arrested aliens.

But, sure enough at the end of the article Jordan confirms my suspicions about Obama’s motives.

The Obama administration hopes the tough enforcement will help it win support in Congress for a broader campaign to overhaul the U.S. immigration system next year. The White House would like to create a path to legal residency and citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants.

For a handy list of just who will be supporting Amnesty for illegal aliens visit this post from last August.   Note that five of the ten top federal refugee resettlement contractors support Amnesty (the others do to, they just didn’t attend the White House pep rally).  I don’t understand how “church” groups and others whose job it is to find scarce work for legal refugees can support increasing the competition for employment by supporting a massive overnight legalization for approximately 12 million immigrants who came illegally.

Rep Gutierrez to introduce Amnesty bill Tuesday

The Federation for Immigration Reform is alerting its supporters that Amnesty is back!  Rep. Gutierrez  plans to introduce his bill, so-called Comprehensive Immigration Reform, on Tuesday, December 15th, according to the Dan Stein Report, here.

“On Tuesday, December 15, Congressman Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL) will introduce new legislation, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act of 2009 (CIR ASAP), to the U.S. House of Representatives,” notes a press release today. “The time for waiting is over. This bill will be presented before Congress recesses for the holidays so that there is no excuse for inaction in the New Year,” Gutierrez said in the release.

Be sure to follow the link back to the press release and see who the co-sponsors are.  If you are looking for some action you can do now, contact your Congressman and tell him or her not to co-sponsor the bill.

Tea partiers and friends will be in Washington Tuesday for another demonstration on health care reform, Gutierrez bill introduction tells us we will have many more reasons to be riding the bus to DC in coming months.  Code red rally, here (wearing red and seeing red)!

Is the Sierra Club’s sugar daddy running low on cash?

Sure looks like it.   But, don’t shed any tears for the Sierra Club! 

Why do we care?

The story is that David Gelbaum, also a big donor to the ACLU, was the man behind the Sierra Club’s decision years ago to take no stand on illegal immigration when it is clear to anyone with half a brain that millions of immigrants flooding America will have a negative impact on air, water, open space and just the general quality of life American’s enjoy.

For those ambitious readers interested in the twists and turns of Leftwing environmentalist’s strategy and their leaders, including Van Jones and Carl Pope, the Apollo Alliance and the Natural Resources Defense Council,unions and big business funders such as Gelbaum and how they have teamed up to open America’s borders, see my earlier posts here, here(Gelbaum featured in this post), here and here.

From the Wall Street Journal today, hat tip Janet Levy.

David Gelbaum, a major donor to the Sierra Club Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union and an organization that provides services to military personnel, said he would cut donations next year because investments in alternative-energy firms have “placed me in a highly illiquid position.”

Mr. Gelbaum said in a letter released Wednesday by the ACLU that he had donated about $389 million to the three groups from 2005 to 2009. 

[….]

Mr. Gelbaum, a major donor to the Democratic Party, didn’t identify the clean-energy investments, but Quercus Trust, the fund that Mr. Gelbaum runs, was down almost 57% over the 18 months to late November, according to PlacementTracker.

The Sierra Club Foundation received $47.7 million from Mr. Gelbaum from 2005 through 2009, according to the letter. The ACLU received $94 million over the same period.

VDARE posted this yesterday and I expect Brenda Walker, an expert on the internal Sierra Club policy battles of the last decade,  is working on something.

Classic case of schadenfreude for me!

Update:  Brenda Walker sends us links to articles she wrote previously on Gelbaum.  The article begins:

Just what is the cost to buy off the Sierra Club—once the most respected environmental organization in America?

A low nine figure sum does the job according to the Los Angeles Times in its story last fall about David Gelbaum, one of the key funders of the 112-year-old environmental organization. [ “The Man Behind the Land” by Kenneth R. Weiss, Oct. 17, 2004]

An honest look at second-generation Latinos

Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies recommends this unusually honest article in the Washington Post — Struggles of the second generation, by N.C. Aizenman. Subtitled “U.S.-born children of Latino immigrants fight to secure a higher foothold,” it starts off with a personal story like almost all Washington Post articles, but soon proceeds to the problems:

Whether they [the second generation of Latino immigrants] succeed will have consequences far beyond immigrant circles. As a result of the arrival of more than 20 million mostly Mexican and Central American newcomers in a wave that swelled in the 1970s and soared during the 1990s, the offspring of Latino immigrants now account for one of every 10 children, both in the United States and the Washington region.

Largely because of the growth of this second generation, Latino immigrants and their U.S.-born children and grandchildren will represent almost a third of the nation’s working-age adults by mid-century, according to projections from U.S. Census Bureau data by Jeffrey S. Passel, a demographer with the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center in Washington.

Not since the last great wave of immigration to the United States around 1900 has the country’s economic future been so closely entwined with the generational progress of an immigrant group. And so far, on nearly every measure, the news is troubling.

Second-generation Latinos have the highest high school dropout rate — one in seven — of any U.S.-born racial or ethnic group and the highest teen pregnancy rate. These Latinos also receive far fewer college degrees and make significantly less money than non-Hispanic whites and other second-generation immigrants.

The reporter points out that their parents, the original immigrants, started out with very little education so although their children have made gains they are still far behind.  Here’s the one piece of good news in the article:

Perhaps the only yardstick by which the second generation has achieved unambiguous success is the one that has stirred the most public controversy: English proficiency. Despite fears among some people that English usage is diminishing in the Latino community, census data and several studies indicate that by the second generation, nearly all Latinos are fluent in English and that by the third generation, few can even speak Spanish.

Much of the article traces the life of one second-generation young man, a high-school dropout and former gang member. He now has two children with his wife or girlfriend and has settled down. But he earns very little, can’t see a better future, and thinks of leaving it all. This is not a perky immigrant story by any means, and I am grateful to the Washington Post for publishing it.