Somali and other immigrants hit by recession in Kansas City

We’ve been writing about the decline in employment for refugees all over the US as the recession progresses.   I don’t know how we are going to manage the 80,000 new refugees projected for FY09.

Here is a story from Kansas City that caught my eye.  Now immigrant-owned businesses are suffering.

On a Thursday evening, Cabdul Barrow sits in the dimly lit Somali restaurant and waits for customers.

Usually at this hour at Towfiq Restaurant in Kansas City’s Northeast area, African immigrants who work late shifts come in for a meal of goat meat and rice or just a cup of green tea.

These days, the restaurant is quiet. [Maybe they have followed the lead of their Somali brothers from Minnesota and have gone off for terrorist training in Somalia?]

“Kenyans, Sudanese, Ugandans, they all come here,” said Barrow, 42. “But there have been a lot of layoffs, and that’s why business is slow.”

In this recession, immigrant business owners and operators such as Barrow, a native of Somalia, face the challenge of expanding their customer bases beyond their communities to stay afloat.

The Northeast area — bounded by the Paseo and Interstate 435, and Gladstone Boulevard and Truman Road — has seen the bulk of the Kansas City area’s new immigrants and refugees, including families from Somalia, Sudan, Burundi, Mauritania, Ivory Coast, Cuba, Myanmar and Vietnam.

If you are wondering how do all these refugees find the capital to even start a business, you should know that the Federal government gives special loans to immigrants to start a business (here).   There are even shariah finance compliant loans to help Muslim immigrants in particular (see Jump Start here).   Hmm, have any of these loans contributed to the banking crisis?   Follow daily information on Shariah Finance at Shariah Finance blog here.

Back to my story.   Big Somali community in KC:

The city’s 5,000 or so Somalis make up one of the metropolitan area’s largest refugee populations. Businesses such as Towfiq, near the corner of Brooklyn and Lexington avenues, are the heart of the Somali community.

Who helped them get to Kansas City?

When they open their own business, most of their products are geared toward their community,” said Martin Okpareke, a refugee employment training manager at Jewish Vocational Services, which has resettled 650 refugees in the last three years, including 487 in the Northeast area.

If you read the Jump Start link above, note that it is these non-profits who administer the loans, not the federal government (we, taxpayers,  just give the money).   I don’t know if Jewish Vocational Services has any such loans, but other volags (non-profits) do.

All of this, creating these ethnic neighborhoods, is encouraged by the local Chamber of Commerce.

The effort to help immigrant- and refugee-owned businesses expand has become a priority for the Northeast Kansas City Chamber of Commerce, which envisions the Northeast area becoming an international market for Kansas City, a place where families can sample foreign foods and other products.

Now, what will the Chamber do with neighborhoods of unemployed immigrants?

By the way, we have heard through the grapevine (but have nothing in writing so far) that the Muslim Brotherhood’s US headquarters is in KC.

For new readers,  the State Department has suspended a portion of the refugee resettlement program because widespread fraud was discovered primarily among refugees from Africa.

How many Somali refugees were admitted to the US in the last 25 years?  Go here.

Holy Cao! Want some good refugee news?

Good news about refugees is rare, I know. The election of  Joseph Cao in Louisiana is exactly that. The Republican lawyer, who came to America from Vietnam at age 8 as a refugee, defeated corrupt Democrat congressman William Jefferson last week. An article at Rightpundits reported:

Anh “Joseph” Cao, 41, was born in Saigon in 1967. He fled Vietnam in 1975 with his mother and two siblings when he was eight years old, and came to America as a refugee. His father, a soldier in the South Vietnamese army, was captured and imprisoned by North Vietnamese Communist forces.

Despite a disadvantaged childhood in a refugee community, Cao excelled in academics and went on to study at Baylor University, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in Physics. He then received a master’s degree in philosophy at Fordham University and considered studying to become a priest before entering law school at Loyola University, where he received a J.D. in 2000.

Since receiving his law degree, he has taught law at Loyola and practiced immigration law in the private sector. He has also served as a board member of Boat People SOS (BPSOS), a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering Vietnamese American communities.

Why have Vietnamese been such successful refugees? For one, many were from the educated classes. That’s who got persecuted the most when the communists took over in Vietnam. Also, they had enough money to get to America, money to pay bribes and hire boats. They were not the wretched of the earth, though they were put into wretched circumstances such as re-education camps.

They were grateful to come to America not because we had a good welfare system but because we were a free country where they could believe what they wanted, and a country of opportunity where they could prosper from hard work.

Maybe the refugee agencies or the State Department should hire some Vietnamese-Americans to give lessons to the new refugees.

Rohingya again: sorting things out, sort of

I don’t even know what to title this post.  I just wanted to get a few bits of information saved as we piece together this Burmese Muslim group’s history and present demands.

In summary, the US is resettling very large numbers of Burmese Karen Christians.  The mainstream media has made us aware of the plight of minorities in the country now known as Myanmar (formerly Burma).   However, at least according to the Rohingya (Burmese Muslims) minority, the United Nations and the US have it in for them and are not resettling them in significant numbers.   So, they have an on-going public relations campaign demanding fairness in the resettlement program of the UN.

Although the English is spotty at best, you can get an idea from this post yesterday at The Sail what the grievance is.

UNHCR particularly against its mandate, mission and violates its right to protect the same refugees in the same manner. It leads ultimately the intentional violates the human rights of the refugees. However, Rohingya is the most oppressed group in Burma and they can’t enjoy like others and they are not recognized like others.

In the other hand, US president George W. Bush had seek to provide assistant by changing its restrictions relevant to material supported groups. But it has yet to reflect for unfortunate Rohingya refugees. It is against towards American’s compassion, tolerance and humanity as the largest resettlement country. It means that all of restrictions are targeting to vulnerable Rohingya refugees.

The reference to “material supported groups” refers to a restriction we have in place to not allow refugees who have materially supported terrorism to enter the US.  The Secretary of State can waive the “material support” restriction and Sec. of State Rice did that to allow the Burmese Karen into the US.   The Karen “terrorists” were fighting the Burmese Junta, the government we don’t like anyway, so they weren’t really terrorists, or so the logic goes.

According to a commenter at this post the other day, Burmese Muslims are getting into the US already having entered Karen refugee camps, but the name “Rohingya” is not being used.   Here is the comment we received on December 9th:

Hi thanks for posting my comment. The Muslim refugees that we have resettled have “Karen” as their ethnicity. We all thought this was interesting because they don’t speak Karen. I actually talked to International Rescue committee (the overseas processing entity – OPE), the agency subcontracted with processing the refugee cases in Thailand, about this situation. I inquired what the Muslims refugees’ ethnicity was and their only response was “problematic”; I could get no response beyond that.

My original statement is that these folks were living inside the Karen territory and that their ethnicity might actually be assigned by the processing agencies, with either the Dept. of Homeland Security’s blessing or blind eye. I think DHS knows who these folks are, and is allowing them to be resettled as Karen, because of the special Karen P-2 group designation. Our ethnic Burmese caseworker says they are different than the Rohinga. Our ethnic Karen caseworker says they are not really Karen. It’s really hard for me to tell, other than they look darker and they speak only Burmese, no Karen.

It is very probable that the Karen political leaders are not happy about this misidentification, but the Karen in the US seem to be more preoccupied with the usual perils of US resettlement. No one has ever said anything against each other that I have heard.

I wondered about that, not using the name Rohingya, and just happened to come across a blog called Rohingya Info Corner which contains a lengthy discussion of who the Rohingya are and explains a longstanding dispute about how Muslims got to Burma in the first place, in what century did they get there, and how deeply rooted they are in Arakan.    The name Rohingya was not used throughout history to describe this group of Muslims.

Again, as I mentioned at the outset, I am confused by all this myself and just want to save pieces of the puzzle here for another day when they may all come together.

From Rohingya Info Corner:

So we can imagine here how deep and extensive the interrelationship of Muslims or Rohihgya with Arakan’ s socio-political life was. Only when and where there is a considerable numbers of populations, they can try to gain the reign of a land. As a scholar, Dr. Aye Chan knows well that history is wide, and in some where it is very much complicated. It is sometimes very difficult to uncover the nature of some deeply rooted facts. Sometimes later discovery proves old ideas wrong. Some historical points remain controversial until present time. There are many issues where historians do not get consensus yet. However the more we research the more we fmd. That is why we can not assume that Rohingya’ s history will ever remain undiscovered. We can not say it should be what like a section of people wants it to be. Many historians local, as well as foreign have been continuously bringing new evidences and proofs in support of Rohingyas’ deeply rooted existence in Arakan.

Foreign historians and UN senior officials take active and leading part in it. As the saying goes, “the drum of truth is beaten by air”, so the issue of Rohingyas’ ethnicity and present suffering are propagated by world media. Perhaps Dr. Aye Chan knows it better than we do. I hope Dr. Aye Chan will adjust himself to reason and will act fair-mindedly keeping prejudices towards on.

My advice to both Rohingyas and Rakhine, the major races in Arakan, is to adopt the ideal of Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln said, ” As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy. Whatever differs from this to the extent of difference is no democracy”.

Inadvertently I think, the author hit the nail on the head with his comment above in bold.   A certain population gaining control of a country is what all this is about.  Only in America do we believe deeply in the melting pot myth. 

And, now adding more wandering thoughts to an already wandering post, check out Gates of Vienna the other day on Democratic Tyranny in light of the Rohingya defenders definition of democracy above.    After reading GOV, I think I won’t be using the word “democracy” casually ever again!

For more (much more!) on Rohingya, see our Rohingya Reports category here.

From Jerusalem: Geert Wilders speaks at Facing Jihad Conference

Update:   Thanks to Jerry Gordon here is a more readable version (wordpress was giving me fits) of the speech at Andrew Bostom’s blog.

On-going at this moment in Israel is the all-important Facing Jihad conference that many  members of the Worldwide Anti-Jihad blogging network are attending.  Here is an excerpt of a speech given by Geert Wilders today.   Wilders, a Dutch Member of Parliament, is perhaps best known in the US for his controversial film, Fitna.

Thanks to Janet for getting this out so quickly.

Wilders:

It’s a privilege for me to be here in this beautiful city Jerusalem, the capitol of the only democracy in the entire Middle East. When I was a teenager I lived some years here in this city and after that I visited Israel more times than I can count. Israel: the only country in the region with a functioning parliament, a rule of law and free elections. The only country in the region that shares the values of our Western societies, in fact is one of the foundations of our Judeo-Christian identity.

We are here to voice our concern over the growing Islamisation of the West. We do this in this city, the city of David. The city that, together with Rome and Athens, symbolizes our ancient heritage.

Perhaps a few of you may be new to Jerusalem, yet, Jerusalem is not new to any of you. We all carry Jerusalem in our blood, in our genes. We all live and breathe Jerusalem. We talk Jerusalem, we dream Jerusalem. Simply because, the values of ancient Israel have become the values of the West. We are all Israel, and Israel is in all of us.

This city is the capital of a democracy under threat. Israel is under siege, like the Jewish community in the Land of Israel is under siege for over a century now. Israel with all its glory and splendour is unique, and its history unparalleled. Yet, Israel’s security situation is not unique, and neither is its enemy………….  

Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other places to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Therefore, the war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad.
Thanks to Israeli parents who see their children go off to join the army and lie awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and have pleasant dreams, unaware of the dangers looming.

At present the front-line of jihad runs not just through the streets of Tel Aviv and Haifa, but through the streets of London, Madrid, and Amsterdam as well. Jihad is our common enemy, and we better start Facing Jihad before it is too late……………. 

 

 

 

 

I will say a few things about the Islamisation of Europe and my film Fitna. I will use some examples from the Netherlands, because they are indicative for the situation on the continent.

The mass migration to the Netherlands continues full-speed ahead. Currently, a staggering number of new immigrants arrive every year, many of them Muslim, often uneducated, if not illiterate. Bringing along with them the local customs of the mountains and deserts of backward Islamic countries. Thousands and thousands of Muslims arrive in the Netherlands every year, while already one million Muslims are living in our tiny country.

There are many problems concerning this massive influx: immigrants are overly represented in social benefits and crime statistics and the overall costs are staggering. The financial costs of mass immigration in the Netherlands exceeds 100 billion euro’s.

But what we have to fear most is the creeping Islamisation, the stealth jihad. Because every Islamic neighbourhood, every Islamic shop, every mosque, every Islamic school, every burqa, every veil is regarded by many Muslims as building blocks towards a larger goal, towards domination.

This is in fact the essence of the problem. Not crime, not even the financial burden. The biggest problem is the demographic development, and the way it influences our society at large. Immigration from Muslim countries and the demographics will result in the Eurabia that the brave Bat Ye’or is warning about. It will become reality if we don’t act now……….

How are we to remain a democracy if a large part of the growing Muslim population is in favour of introducing shariah law? How is Amsterdam to remain the gay capitol of Europe if gays are regularly beaten up by non western immigrants, often Muslims? How are the Jewish communities of Europe to survive with a growing presence of an ideology that is so blatantly anti-Semitic? How are we to remain a centre of cultural and scientific excellence if Islam opposes art, and academic exploration? How are we to remain an open and tolerant society if we are faced with part of the Muslim community favouring self-segregation and showing no desire for assimilation? How can we look to the future with confidence, when a large part of the population turns to a seventh century desert for answers?

These are the questions the multiculturalists don’t want to answer.

Instead of providing leadership our political elite fooled us by using our own principles against us. Five examples. 

First.

Our tolerance is used as an argument to bring in more Islam, to bring in more Muslims, and a way to tell us that we should not criticize their Islamic culture, if you do you are labeled intolerant and racist.

Second.

Democracy. A growing Muslim electorate is too hard for politicians to resist, so they give in to their grievances and demands to win their vote. Before long shariah law will be introduced, legally and democratically, by means of majority vote. The former Dutch Minister of Justice once said that shariah law could be part of the Dutch legal system if a two third majority of the population would be in favour of it.

Third.

Our religious freedom is utilized by an ideology that has no plans whatsoever to play by our rules, yet demands the same rights our traditional religions have had for centuries;

Fourth.

Our welfare state that once was the envy of the world, now functions as a magnet for a lot of non-Western immigrants, dreaming of a cushy life in wealthy Europe.

Fifth.

Our open borders came to symbolize our open mindset, an example of our cosmopolitan hospitality. But now we have lost control of our borders and we can’t even keep track of who is entering our countries, let alone prevent them from entering. 

 

 

 

Our Western principles are hollow if they are not accompanied by a desire to sustain our culture and our civilization, based upon knowing who we are and where we come from. We are not from Saudi-Arabia. We are not from Iran. We come from Rome, Athens and Jerusalem. That makes our civilization special, and certainly worth preserving.

In spite of all that, the political elite are still madly in love with their pet project, the multicultural society, as they call it romantically. Apparently they don’t live in the neighbourhoods that are turning Islamic. They will tell you “they are nice people. I don’t see the problem?” The Muslim immigrant’s demands sound reasonably to them, like: “let us have an extra-large mosque”.

It is very difficult to remain optimistic in the face of the growing Islamisation of Europe. The tide is turning against us. We are losing on every front. Regarding the demographics, Islam is gaining momentum. The ruling elite is even proud of the Muslim immigration. After all, this way they can show everyone that they are not racists. Academia, the arts, the media, trade unions, the churches, the business world, the entire political establishment have all converted to the suicidal theory of multiculturalism and cultural relativism.

Be sure to see his short film “Fitna” at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3369102968312745410 

 

 

 

 

 

Johns Hopkins forum sought to explain refugee resettlement program

This is old news, it happened in November, but as I said before I have piles of backed-up refugee stories to mention.

A forum and panel discussion was held at Johns Hopkins Univ. to explain the refugee program and how it’s going in Baltimore, MD.   There is lots of information about the history of refugees arriving in Baltimore, and there is the usual whinefest about not enough money to run the program properly.

The IRC (International Rescue Committee) has been resettling refugees in Baltimore since 1999. In fiscal year 2008 they resettled 480 refugees and 140 asylees, with the majority coming from Nepal, Myanmar and Iraq and various African nations.

The IRC sees Baltimore as a good city to resettle refugees to because the costs of living are lower than many other eastern cities. It is also fitted with accessible public transportation. Refugees also serve to further culturally enrich an already diverse city.

Martin Ford of the Maryland Office for New Americans said that resettlement agencies are under a great deal of pressure to provide comprehensive resettlement services with limited resources.

Limited resources!   Readers should know that the International Rescue Committee is an approximately $200 million a year operation.  In 2005 (No more recent financial documents would open) the organization received $88 million in taxpayer funding.  So when they say that they put up thousands for each refugee family, know that a large portion of that comes from you!

This (IRC responsibility)  includes paying for rent and utilities during their fist months here, as well as helping them secure employment. However, these grants total only $850 per refugee. Fikremariam (Worku Fikremariam, resettlement program manager for the International Rescue Committee in Baltimore) estimated that his agency spends $3,000 to $4,000 per refugee family in the first few months they are in the country.

Half of the $850 stays with the volag (IRC here) in addition to many other grants the IRC receives from various federal and state agencies.   Again, the $3000 to $4000 is not all THEIR money, but largely your money.

Iraqi refugees are not happy campers!

A substantial portion of this article was taken up with a discussion of the unhappy and often unemployed Iraqi refugees who have been coming to the US at an increased rate in recent months.  See our Iraqi refugee category for an abundance of unhappy Iraqi stories.

One Iraqi asylee*, who asked to remain anonymous because he has many relatives still living in Iraq, estimated that he had already spent one year and several thousand dollars studying for recertification as a physician here. He held a high position in the government after the American invasion and supervised 10 Ph.D. candidates in their dissertation research. He estimated that he would not be properly certified to find a job in his field here until 2010. Until then he has found a part-time job as a translator.

Many recently arrived Iraqis have not been so lucky. This asylee recounted that prior to leaving Iraq many refugees did not realize that they would not be able to apply the same skills and knowledge in their new location. He said that a resettlement agency tried to place another refugee who had been a doctor in Iraq in a low skill job.

“They asked him if he wanted to have a job like wiping the floor or washing dishes. This is impossible for our people, a lot of them prefer to go back home and be killed there than do those jobs here; it is like a stigma,” he said.

Where is the unrealisitic expectation coming from?   We have heard on several previous occasions that the agency processing refugees overseas has not been doing a good job of sitting prospective refugees down and explaining the cold hard facts about our economic situation.

The Iraqi asylee said that many recently arrived Iraqis feel frustrated by their lack of success in securing suitable jobs. He contended that this is a result of the pre-departure orientation, which is received by Iraqis coming to the U.S. under the special immigrant visa created by Congress this year.

The rosy picture of America needs to go away, says IRC spokesman.

Sometimes they have to go through that for reality to hit and the rosy picture of America to go away,” Fikremariam said.”[In such situations] depression sets in, they are in an existential vacuum. ‘Who am I, why I am I here?’

Good question!

* Asylees are given the same benefits as refugees, the difference is that they got to the US on their own steam and then sought asylum.  We bring refugees to the US and pay their airfare.  By the way, this is another way agencies like the IRC make money, they act as collection agents to recover the taxpayer funded airfare and then get to keep a cut for their work with only a portion going back to the federal treasury.