Julia Hahn writing at Breitbart tells us what happenedhere.
If yours is one of the brave ten be sure to thank them! (They are mentioned in Hahn’s story below but I put them right here on top so you wouldn’t have to look far).
After Paris and after San Bernardino this is the best they could do—only ten willing to go to the mat for your safety!
The amendment, offered Sen. Rand Paul, would have suspended visa issuances to more than 30 Muslim countries with active Jihadist populations.Graham and Rubio were both members of the Gang of Eight, which proposed legislation that would expand Muslim immigration, and Paul and Cruz were both opponents of the Gang of Eight bill.
Graham and Rubio’s vote against curbing Muslim migration follows the attack in San Bernardino. The male suspect, Syed Farook, is the son of Pakistani immigrants; and the female suspect, Farook’s wife, Tashfeen Malik, was a Pakistani native. According to CNN, the two met, “when he [Farook] had gone to Saudi Arabia in 2013 on the Hajj, the annual pilgrimage to Mecca that Muslims are required to take at last once in their lifetime. It was during this trip that he met Malik, a native of Pakistan who came to the United States in July 2014 on a ‘fiancée visa’ and later became a lawful permanent resident.”
Sen. Paul’s amendment failed 89-10, with only nine other Senators joining Paul’s bid for a halt to the large-scale distribution of visas to nations with jihadist populations. The nine others supporting Paul’s amendment were Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), Mike Enzi (R-WY), Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL), Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS), Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), and Senator Ted Cruz.
Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Republican Whip Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), and GOP Conference Chair Sen. John Thune (R-SD) voted against the amendment. Thune’s vote is particularly notable as the GOP conference is in charge of the Republican Party’s messaging in the Senate.
Go here for the rest of the story (there is a lot more information). Readers Rubio is never going to be your friend on immigration issues!
The Washington Post is reporting the storyhere. The letterwas gotten together by the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society(one of nine federal contractors which benefit financially from the resettlement of refugees to your towns and cities). We told youhere and here that HIAS is pulling out all the stops to pressure Congress right now.
HIAS has said it wants 100,000 Syrians to be admitted to the US before Obama leaves office, and we know that as of a few days ago 99% of the Syriansadmitted in this fiscal year are Sunni Muslims.
The greater the number of Muslim immigrants admitted to the US the greater chance that someone like this poor Messianic Jew*** murdered in San Bernardino two days ago will die. (His wife says he died a martyr for his religion.)
Get this through your heads! Muslims are not going to love you more if you help them to migrate to the West!
Did HIAS tell the Rabbis the truth?
Before they signed, did HIAS tell the rabbis that 99% of those HIAS is resettling from Syria are Muslims?
Did HIAS tell them that the UNHCR is NOT focusing on religious minorities, but almost exclusively on Sunni Muslims for America?
Brigitte Gabriel at ACT for America is famous for saying that “moderate Muslims are irrelevant” because they don’t stand up to the extremists. This is going to sound harsh, but if you are a Jew who disagrees with HIAS and yet don’t stand up to them (or your rabbi who might be on this list), you are irrelevant too!
And to make it fair! As we pointed out here on Sunday, if your church is on this list and you don’t say anything, you aren’t only irrelevant, but complicit!
***See this whole article about those slaughtered at their annual Christmas party. I was struck by the diversity of the victims of the devout Islamic killers—many races, religions, sexes, are represented, no one was spared! They, and you, have one thing in common—you are all infidels!
This is an interview by Ginni Thomas for Daily Caller, before this week’s slaughter of innocents by devout Muslim immigrants. (Simpson does mention that the children of Muslim migrants are becoming more devout and may indeed be of greater concern to us than those supposedly ‘screened’ before admission.) Hereis what Thomas says of the interview:
As Americans awaken to dangers to our homeland, they are losing confidence in President Obama. A new poll shows Americans’ confidence in President Obama’s efforts to keep us safe after the Paris jihadist attacks is dropping. [Remember this interview was taped BEFORE San Bernardino.—ed]
Jim Simpson, author of “Red-Green Axis: Refugees, Immigration and the Agenda to Erase America,” has no confidence in the screening or border security policies of the Obama administration. To Simpson, a host of open border policies — including the Refugee Resettlement Program — provide a fertile ground for terrorists to enter the United States.
In this 25-minute video interview, he says, “This president and this administration have little if any concern for the welfare of American citizens. They are all about advancing their agenda and amassing political power at the expense of our welfare, our safety, everything. They are greedy for power.”
The three things he wants more people to know about the refugee program are: (1) The inordinate influence of the United Nations in determining the bulk of who comes to America; (2) Governors, mayors and Congress have almost no say in the refugee resettlement process; and (3) Refugees are but one program bringing in outsiders who could threaten our national security.
Please visit the Daily Caller to watch the 25-minute interview by clicking here.
Simpson is helping the grassroots citizens organize across America. Go here to the Center for Security Policy and sign up to join others in your state who are fighting back against Obama’s plan to change America by changing the people. Someone will contact you.
See our category on ‘Pockets of Resistance’ here and see especially this latest from Breitbart, here. By the way, Redlands CA where the killers were building their bombs had formed a ‘pocket of resistance’ two month ago.
Action Alert: Call your members of the House and Senate at 202-224-3121 and ask them to vigorously oppose the Refugee Resettlement funding contained in the Omnibus Spending Bill that will be voted on by 12-11-15! Please call by this Friday, Dec. 4th. Today!
Editor: Late last month, here, we mentioned that the United Nations-driven Agenda 2030 now involves the use of ‘refugees’ migrating around the world as an important tool for The Agenda. A reader, Sharon Shaw, from Kentucky has been following the issue closely and has offered to provide us with a series of informational pieces to help bring us all up to speed on the larger agenda designed to destroy individual freedom, and diminish American sovereignty and power as decisions for our future would be made at an international level. This is not in the realm of conspiracy theories, they are right up front about it. So, maybe if we have that understanding from the beginning we won’t waste a lot of time asking, is it happening, why is it happening and just get to work defeating them!
Agenda 2030 is Agenda 21 on steroids, she says!
Here is Sharon ….
Agenda 2030: Interpreting the components
You will likely be hearing more about the UN’s Agenda 2030 in the upcoming months. What is it? It is the UN’s Agenda 21 on steroids. Agenda 21 was presented to 178 world leaders at the UN Earth Summit in 1992. The US was among the participants and the President, George H.W. Bush and his administration began adopting parts of the agenda into American laws and lives.
President Clinton, in 1993, signed Executive Order 12852 to create the President’s Council on Sustainable Development in order to “harmonize” US environmental policy with UN directives as outlined in Agenda 21.
Fast forward to September 2015: The UN holds another world summit with hundreds of world leaders “Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” It is basically Agenda 21 revised, but its intentions are much more far-reaching to change the planet according to UN guidance. Posing as an altruistic plan for the good of all mankind, this plan is designed to rob individuals of freedoms through its mandates and to take individual countries’ sovereignties away.
What does all this have to do with refugee resettlement? The two go hand-in-hand, literally one supporting the other so to speak. The main goal, as stated by the UN, is sustainable development. Although there are 17 goals included in Agenda 2030,
What is sustainable development? According to its authors, the objective of sustainable development is to “integrate economic, social and environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity.” Authors of Agenda 2030 insist that every societal decision be based on environmental impact, focusing on three components; global land use, global education, and global population control and reduction.
In the Agenda 2030 document, under the heading “The New Agenda”, para. 29:
“We recognize the positive contribution of migrants for inclusive growth and sustainable development. We also recognize that international migration is a multi-dimensional reality of major relevance for the development of countries of origin, transit and destination, which requires coherent and comprehensive responses. We will cooperate internationally to ensure safe, orderly and regular migration involving full respect for human rights and the humane treatment of migrants regardless of migration status, of refugees and of displaced persons. Such cooperation should also strengthen the resilience of communities hosting refugees, particularly in developing countries. We underline the right of migrants to return to their country of citizenship, and recall that States must ensure that their returning nationals are duly received.”
This statement boldly defines the “open borders” policies adopted by the European Union, policies which, as currently evidenced, have failed miserably. At its core, Agenda 2030 is a methodology utilizing refugee resettlement as a tool for this “new universal Agenda” (quote from Agenda 2030 preamble).
Stay tuned for our next article exploring Agenda 2030 as we delve into its components and what it means for our country, and, indeed, all nations.
Thank you Sharon!
We have an entire category here at RRW entitled, Comments worth noting/guest posts where you will find this archived for future reference. Related information: I’m finding that few people even know about Obama’s Task Force on New Americans which was finalized back in April. Here is the report which lays out very clearly how Obama is changing America by changing the people and how that fits very nicely with plans coming down from the United Nations level (and whoever runs the UN!).
One final thought….every time there is a slaughter of innocents by devout Muslims (who don’t want the UN agenda! They have their own!), as we saw in San Bernardino this week, it sets the UN/Obama agenda back as more Americans wake up to the migration piece of the plan to control us. I think that is why we don’t see a normal sad emotional response from our dear leader. I believe deep down he is feeling it’s another setback to The Agenda because more Americans will be wakened and objecting to the transformation of their cities!
Don’t forget! If you want to stop the migration this is where we start…..
Action Alert: Call your members of the House and Senate at 202-224-3121 and ask them to vigorously oppose the Refugee Resettlement funding contained in the Omnibus Spending Bill that will be voted on by 12-11-15! Please call by this Friday, Dec. 4th.