Just now I was scrolling around to see what the reaction is among members of the refugee industry about the Kennedy decision at the Supreme Court yesterday.
So I stopped by Amnesty International and see that, of course, they are not thrilled, here.
(But, as I have told you innumerable times, the Supremes went too far in the first place and much of what people are having anxiety attacks over will be moot in a few weeks.)
But, then I noticed this action item and was interested to see their involvement in saving gay men in Chechnya from kidnapping and death (that is good), but I noticed one important item not mentioned in their action item for supporters.
Amnesty to their supporters: Tell those bad Russians what you think…..
So tell me, what have they failed to mention?
95% of Chechnya is Muslim. Islam directs the killing of gay men.
As the demographic makeup of a country becomes more Islamic, they become emboldened.
Maybe if Amnesty was more honest about the source of the prejudice they could save more people instead of making it sound like the bad ol’ [rightwing] Russians (who have little control over Chechnya!) are to blame.
As I have said until you are surely sick to death of it, President Donald J. Trump is expected to present to Congress a ‘determination’ within days about how many third world impoverished people will be admitted to the US beginning on October 1.
But, here is the thing—he has complete authority to say that NO refugees will be admitted in FY18because the Refugee Act of 1980 gives that power to the President!
In the last 2 days, three reporters (that I know of) wrote about suspending, or shutting down, the UN/US Refugee Admissions Program for this year.
First, Thomas Allen at VDARE wrote this (read it all, it is full of historical knowledge about the program). Allen mentions this:
But even Open Borders activists recognize Trump has the legal authority to set the number at zero for 2018. Frank Sharry [Email him] a leading Treason Lobbyist, told a group of activists at the National Partnership for New Americans conference in September 2017 [2016-ed] that Trump could “zero the program out” if he chose to.And Congress certainly could zero out the funding of the program if it chose to.
Not only did Sharry acknowledge this, but so did Bill Frelick from Human Rights Watch,here.
Bill Frelick of Human Rights Watch: “…there is no requirement that the U.S. resettle a single refugee….”
And, indeed HIAS executives reported (here) that George W. Bush delayed a Presidential determination in the wake of 9/11 without any legal consequences to him. (The administration must have been worried about Islamic terrorists getting in to the US even then!)
And, finally don’t miss Leo Hohmann at World Net Daily where I am quoted saying this:
Ann Corcoran, who has followed refugee resettlement for more than a decade, said Trump has plenty of reason to do just that and still come across as a great humanitarian by focusing on needy Americans.
“The public should be outraged to learn that in the wake of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, which have left tens of thousands of Americans homeless, that we are poised to take in thousands of impoverished refugees when we now have our own refugees, struggling people who have lost their homes, lost everything, with their lives shattered, living in tents, shelters and RVs,” Corcoran said.
“To bring in more from other countries in a time like this would be the ultimate insanity.”
The refugee industry (the resettlement contractors and the cheap labor lobby) want you to think that the President must submit a determination of at least 50,000 for the upcoming fiscal year, but it just isn’t so!
Tell the President what you think byclicking here to get instructions…Tell your members of Congress and US Senators too!