Refugees arrested in Roanoke, VA for plot to kidnap women for ransom

Update August 13th:  The four plead guilty in July, here.

I was away over the Mother’s Day weekend and missed this shocking story when it first broke. Hat tip to Brenda Walker, VDARE author, for bringing it to my attention.    From WDBJ TV-7 in Roanoke which published the original federal press release:

United States Attorney Julia C. Dudley announced today that Joshua KASONGO of Roanoke (age 19), Mohamed Hussein GUHAD of Roanoke (age 19), Luke Musa ELBINO of Vinton (age 19) and Anthony Eugene MUSE of Roanoke (age 18), were indicted by a federal Grand Jury sitting in Roanoke, Virginia on May 7, 2009. Guhad was taken into custody by the FBI on May 1, 2009 and the other three defendants were arrested this morning without incident.

All four defendants were charged in a two count indictment with Kidnapping Conspiracy and Attempted Kidnapping. If convicted on both counts, the maximum penalty faced by the defendants is Life imprisonment and/or a fine of $500,000.

It is charged in the Indictment that KASONGO, GUHAD and ELBINO met to devise a scheme to kidnap the wives of wealthy men to hold for ransom. It was decided that KASONGO would plan the kidnappings and conduct the negotiations for ransom. It was decided that GUHAD would find a location to confine and secrete the kidnapped victims until the payment of ransom, and that GUHAD would obtain the implements necessary for the actual kidnappings, including but not limited to duct tape, rope, gloves, disguises and handcuffs. It was decided that ELBINO would use his laptop computer to identify and research potential targets for the kidnapping scheme.

[….] 

GUHAD is a U.S. Legal Permanent Resident and a citizen of Somalia; ELBINO is a U.S. Legal Permanent Resident and a citizen of Sudan; KASONGO is a U.S. Legal Permanent Resident and a citizen of Rwanda; and, MUSE is a U.S. citizen. GUHAD and MUSE are students at Patrick Henry High School; ELBINO is a student at Virginia Western Community College; and, KASONGO’s employment and/or academic activities are unknown.

On Thursday the four went before a judge: 

Four teenagers are accused of conspiring to kidnap the wives of wealthy men and hold them for ransom. Prosecutors say they drove around nice neighborhoods, including Hunting Hills, to search for victims.

On Thursday, Joshua Kasongo, Luke Elbino and Anthony Muse plead not guilty Thursday to kidnapping conspiracy and attempted kidnapping.

They are all being held without bond until their trials.

From these reports we learned that three of the four are former refugees, it is not clear how the fourth man came to be in the US.

In denying bond for the alleged kidnappers, Judge Michael Urbanski  noted their refugee origins and pronounced the circumstances “sad.”   From the Roanoke Times:

Over and over Thursday, the federal judge commented on the irony of the case before him: the children of refugee families who had fled terror and strife in Africa, now accused of a kidnapping plot.

In successive hearings in federal court in Roanoke, U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael Urbanski said the unlikely sounding scheme attributed to four teens — to abduct the wife of the CEO of a dental insurance company and hold her for ransom — outweighed their otherwise clean records.

The judge said he had to deny bond for Luke Musa Elbino, 19, of Vinton; Joshua Kasongo, 19, of Roanoke; and Anthony Eugene Boyd-Muse, 18, also of Roanoke. But he said their family histories made it a particularly hard decision.

Elbino came to the United States from Sudan, and Kasongo, a citizen of Congo, from Rwanda during the genocide there. A fourth defendant, Mohammed Hussein Guhad, 19, of Roanoke is from Somalia.

Guhad also was ordered held pending a bond hearing to be conducted next week.

Boyd-Muse is the only U.S. citizen charged, though all are in the country legally.

“They came here for the promise of this country,” Urbanski said of Elbino’s family. “This case is sad all around.”

For whom are you sad Judge?   It doesn’t sound like you have the frightened women who were stalked by these men at the top of your “sad” list.   Are you sad that these men ‘flipped the bird’ at the gift given them by the ‘humanitarians’ at the State Department and the volag federal contractors who brought them to America?  Or, are you sad for yourself because the myth of the beautiful American melting pot has been tarnished?

How about the Somali gang murders in Minneapolis and Seattle, or the Sudanese murders and rampages in Maine, Utah and Arizona, or the refugee rampage in Binghamton, New York, did you know about any of those?    Well, you wouldn’t be expected to because the mainstream media rarely mentions them.  They could hardly miss the carnage in Binghamton, but note how quickly the media has forgotten that story.

However, Judge, haven’t you been following the stories about problems with refugees right there in “welcoming” Roanoke?   Just over a year ago I pointed out the growing conflict between American blacks and African refugees in Roanoke here.  And, on top of that Roanoke is getting a wave of Iraqi refugees who are increasingly angry because they don’t have work, here.    Is it any wonder that kidnapping sounded like a good and lucrative plan!   Besides, these men come from a culture where kidnapping for ransom is common, could you possibly expect a few years in America would wipe out their original culture!

Rumor: Refugees are exempt from taxes….

…..for a certain period of time.   This is from reader ‘bearinggifts’:

There is a persistent rumor out there according to which refugees who start businesses are exempt from taxes for a period of time. the tax-free time is usually stated as 3 years.

Sometimes this rumor has it that they pay no taxes of any type (eg., no income taxes, if employed) for a period of time. I kind of doubt this version of the rumor, but was wondering about the business tax exemption. It really sounds like something the corrupt SBA would do.

‘Bearinggifts,’ I keep hearing the rumor too about refugees not paying federal income tax for 3 years, but if that is true that would be a bombshell piece of information.  I’m guessing it is more likely that their income is so low they fall into that huge segment of the American population that pays no taxes anyway (you know the ones Obama wants to redistribute the wealth to).

I don’t know about the small business angle except that refugees get all sorts of opportunities through micro-loans and special savings accounts (IDAs) to start businesses.

Judy wrote favorably of such loans here.  I would be interested to know in light of the banking crisis how many of those loans have gone into default.  Note also in Judy’s story that a volag is involved in the lending—International Institute of St. Louis.  Is this more of the taxpayer-money racket these volags have gotten into?

I have written less favorably of micro-loans geared to immigrants and refugees here because these loans use special Sharia financing rules.  And, here for several reasons, not the least of which is that this favoritism creates animosity in small communities where American citizens wonder why they can’t get such good deals.

I’m getting off track.  As for the tax question,  ‘bearinggifts,’ I don’t know if those businesses are tax-exempt for a period of time.  Does anyone know?

Rumors is a new category we launched last week to try to find the facts behind many aspects of the Refugee Resettlement Program of the federal government.   Because the program is run so secretively, rumors abound.  And, frankly it is to the program’s detriment.  From the very beginning in Hagerstown, MD I’ve contended that informing the public is critically important.   If the program is a good one it should withstand public scrutiny.

IRC to Obama: give us $$$$$ and more refugees

That’s the gist of a letter writing campaign initiated recently by the International Rescue Committee.   It confirms just what we have been saying all along.  The only reform the volag government contractors want to see for the deeply troubled Refugee Resettlement Program is more taxpayer funding for them while keeping the refugee spigot wide open (nevermind that there are no jobs!).

Thanks to a regular visitor to RRW, here is what they are asking refugee industry advocates to say to Obama:

We urge you to renew America’s promise to refugees who are waiting to find safety and freedom in our country. We call on you to take the following steps to modernize the U.S. government’s system for refugee admission and resettlement:

– Provide increased funding to ensure the U.S. refugee admissions and resettlement programs are able to fulfill their goals for providing sanctuary to refugees who need protection.

– Streamline the current system for identifying, clearing and resettling refugees in the United States.

[Your name]

[Your address] 

For new readers, learn more about the International Rescue Committee and its public relations push to get more money from US taxpayers by starting here.

UN will be pushing more (a lot more!) Somali refugees our way in 2010

Dadaab is the massive Somali refugee camp in Kenya run by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and it is growing daily as radical Islamists continue to throw Somalia into chaos—-their goal is for strict fundamentalist Islam to reign supreme in the Horn of Africa.

The US began taking Somali refugees in a serious way in the early 1980’s and since then we have resettled over 80,000 Somalis.   The numbers have varied over the years but more than half of the 80,000 plus came since 9/11 (see data here).  In FY2008 we resettled 2,523 Somalis in the entire year, most of those must have been “free cases” because fraud had shut down the larger P-3 “family reunification” portion of refugee resettlement half way into the fiscal year.

Although family reunification is still suspended, in FY 2009 we have already resettled 2,232 Somalis.   Now comes this news about the UNHCR:

The resettlement of the 270,000 Somali refugees in third countries is the most viable alternative to repatriation and local integration. Although it is fraught with difficulties, it remains the dream of most of the refugees. UNHCR, which runs the camp, is hoping to resettle around 8,600 refugees in 2009. Even it if resettles that many and reaches the 2010 target of 20,000 people, the arrival of new refugees means that the population at Dadaab is unlikely to decline.

The US takes the lions share of refugees worldwide.  I couldn’t find the percentage off hand but we top the other resettlement countries including various European countries, Canada, Australia and New Zealand by a wide margin.   So, if the UNHCR gets its way, I guess that means we will be ‘welcoming’ the lions share of 20,000 Somalis in 2010!

VDARE author says “do-gooders” work with businesses to supply cheap labor, calls it “neo-slavery”

I’ve been tossing this question around in my head ever since we started writing Refugee Resettlement Watch—are the volags (federal contractors who re-settle refugees) acting as employment services for big business while wearing their humanitarian hats?   Blulitespecial brought this provactive article by Brenda Walker to my attention, and although it is mostly about illegal immigrants, legal immigrants are also part of the cheap labor force.

I’ve mentioned this idea on several occasions—that Refugee Resettlement has been promoted by the Left as a humanitarian initiative but has a dark side.   I go back to this post, ironically written exactly one year ago today, in which I revealed that Bill Clinton supplied Bosnian refugee labor to the meatpacking industry in Iowa.

Now to Walker at VDARE:

Some patriotic friends of borders may have thought that a severe recession would be an impossible time for Washington to push through an amnesty for 10-30 million lawbreaking foreigners. But Senator Charles Schumer, Chair of the Subcommittee on Immigration, thinks now is a fine time for amnesty. He held a hearing April 30 to explore how to accomplish that goal.

Why?

It’s just another example the lengths to which business elites will go to protect and expand their firehose supply of the cheapest workers possible—by promoting everything from open borders to H-1b visas and permissive legal immigration. Labor can never be too cheap nor too exploitable for the captains of industry.

Hence the substantial lobbying arm in Washington to thwart the well-being of citizen workers. A recent FAIR report found that 521 corporations, business groups, unions, nonprofits and the like reported lobbying on three important immigration bills introduced in Congress over the past three years. Of those, 98 percent of activity was to secure more permissive immigration laws and lessened enforcement to ensure cheap, “willing” workers keep coming.

Neo-slavery (sound familiar?):

The neo-slaves of the iPod age may sleep several to a room or even outdoors. They depend upon do-gooders in churches to help out with clothing and other assistance. The unwilling taxpayer is forced to supplement the “cheap” labor with food stamps, housing and free-to-aliens medical care.

There is lots more in this thought-provoking piece, so go to VDARE and read the whole article.

Also, please return to this post in March about a Center for Immigration Studies report on how immigrant cheap labor depresses wages.