Hagerstown Refugee article: a story I have been sitting on (Part 1)

This article has been sitting around in my list of potential posts since August 3rd.  I’ve started to post on it several times, but didn’t want to get into a big dissertation on how refugee resettlement in Hagerstown inspired the creation of this blog, but decided when I saw the article published at another site that I really needed to get my energy up to write about it.

The story in the Hagerstown Herald Mail is your standard, immigrants are struggling but doing well, people are nice to them, but Hagerstown is “unwelcoming” because citizens ran out of town the Virginia Council of Churches—that’s the agency that had been resettling refugees to the city two to three years ago.   The “unwelcoming” attitude came in the wake of an unfortunate incident, we are told.

When they came to Hagerstown, a Virginia Council of Churches office in Hagerstown helped refugees resettle. That office closed in 2007, its officials citing an “unwelcoming” community after an incident brought to light the presence of a group of refugees in Hagerstown.

In October 2006, some residents and government officials discovered that refugees were being resettled locally after a Burundian woman experienced a severe case of morning sickness on West Franklin Street, where the refugees were living.

Because the woman’s translator was unavailable, authorities thought she and other refugees possibly had a communicable disease. Hazmat units were sent to the area, and the 12 African refugees were quarantined briefly.

This is a very simplistic description of what happened.    This incident served only to force the Herald Mail to report to the public in a front page story that refugees were quietly being resettled by an agency from out of state.    Some of us initially just wanted to know how the program worked, who decided which cities would get refugees, did local government have any say in the matter, who would employ the refugees, what services would they receive etc.  Here is a post I wrote in September 2007 in which I tell readers the questions I asked the Herald Mail to research and report on and they refused.

So some of us asked for a public meeting and got it.   The US State Department sent a couple of top people, Maryland sent its refugee people, and Church World Service, the contractor of Virginia Council of Churches, and VCC all attended and spent the evening dodging questions and talking down to us.

I thought about this yesterday because the contentious Townhall meeting with Senator Cardin on health care reform was held in the same theater at Hagerstown Community College and it occurred to me that the source of many peoples’ anger yesterday and two years ago is that citizens have had it with being dictated to from elite ‘smart people’ from Washington.  It wasn’t the refugees people were angry at two years ago, it was the big-government bureaucrats and their religious left minions (cheered on by editors of the Herald Mail) shoving a federal program down our throats that was so maddening to many of the residents of Washington County.

When Washington comes to town, we just want good and open government, not sneaky government!

And, finally what the Herald Mail and Virginia Council of Churches don’t tell you is that somehow VCC was screwing up badly here (the woman in the hazmat incident above was located in the worst building in the worst neighborhood in town, why?).   VCC was shut down from the top and sent back to Virginia by the US State Department and their bosses at Church World Service!  Calling us “unwelcoming” as a parting shot was just to advance their political agenda.

You can read all about the lead-up to, and aftermath of, that September 2007 meeting in our category on the subject, here.

It was this refugee debacle in Hagerstown, MD that inspired the creation of Refugee Resettlement Watch.   We want to be sure other citizens know how this federal program works and why it needs to be reformed.

See Part II to see what prompted me to finally get around to mentioning this article.

Campaign launched this week to educate the public about American workers losing jobs to imported labor

NumbersUSA and the Coalition for the Future American Worker have begun a nationwide education campaign with a TV advertisement that will be airing on cable TV soon.  Asking for a “time-out,” here is what they had to say in their announcement on Tuesday (you can view the ad here also).

NumbersUSA last November called for a suspension of most immigration.

With the launch of this ad campaign in August, NumbersUSA is accelerating its mobilization for a time-out on the importation of most foreign workers.

The fact is that U.S. immigration policies are on automatic pilot. It doesn’t matter how terrible the economy becomes — it doesn’t matter that 15 million Americans are looking for a job and can’t find one. No matter what, businesses can still seek to cut their labor costs by bringing in as many foreign workers as they did when the economy was booming.

We definitely have observed  how an immigration program is on “automatic pilot.”   There seems to be absolutely no talk of reducing refugee numbers even though half, if not more, arriving today will not find work.

University of New Hampshire releases new study on refugees in that state

Here is the press release last week (the link to the report is in the release).  I only had time to skim it, but it looks like the same old story—refugees need more help from Washington (that means you the taxpayer).  It is taken as a given that the Federal government is going to send more refugees to your town, and you won’t have much to say about it.   Reform of the program doesn’t go beyond getting more “resources” ($$$$) for refugees, which of course will be passed-through the NGO  resettlement contractor monopoly!

If you read the report and find they actually go beyond the standard talking points for so-called reform, let me know.    No one ever asks basic questions  like:  how did we go from private charity to government sponsored charity for refugees, why doesn’t a local community have some say about how many refugees a locale can handle, or why religious groups are getting funded for this work, or why there are so many cases of refugees placed in substandard housing and crime-ridden neighborhoods,  or are there some cultures that are never going to be compatible with American culture, or how about discussing the unhappy refugees and whether they might like to return to their homeland?

Comment worth noting: Need temporary stop to resettlement

This is a comment from Ralph Parker who apparently works with refugees in the Atlanta area.  This is what he says about the robbery of a Bhutanese refugee girl which I reported yesterday here.

Wanted to update your readers. I have been a volunteer with the family whose daughter was robbed at gunpoint.

Finally the resettlement agency is going to move the 4 families in the unsafe apartment and area they are in. There are 2 other families whose agency has not responded to a request to move their clients to a safer place.

All the Bhutanese families in this complex want to move. There was no excuse for 3 refugee agencies placing people in an apartment complex with almost a one mile walk to public transportation. The facts are that in urban America there are no safe areas, when apartments are concerned for low income folks. Even the place where they are moving has had problems but is better and there will be 30+ Bhutanese families there. We estimate a Bhutanese population of 1200-1500 in Atlanta and we will have the largest Bhutanese population in America. There is still about 50% unemployment and there have been evictions.

I agree the program is seriously flawed and we need to have a temporary stop to resettleemnt. As you can imagine the girl was quite shaken as were all the families. They knew we were having economic issues but assumed they would be safe in America. Given our large population, we haven’t suffered like Jacksonville as there have been only a few incidents but it will get worse.

As I have stated before, the Bhutanese are the most special group I have worked with in my 12 years as a volunteer. They are so humble and spiritual. I encourage your readers to actually meet and work with a family.

I understand concerns about other ethnic groups, but this one is so different as case workers can attest to.

Mr. Parker, some years back (I’m still tracking down the link) the Atlanta paper did an investigation about refugees being placed in apartment buildings that just happened to be owned by resettlement agency bigwigs.   Is there any evidence of this practice still going on as a possible explanation for why agencies are placing refugees in certain buildings?  The only other plausible explanation is that they are cheap and want to use as little of their own funds as possible.

The only plausible reason the resettlement agencies (well, the top ten contractors who hire the local resettlement agencies anyway) to continue to encourage as a big a stream of refugees to the US as they can get is because their funding (from the taxpayer) is linked to how many refugees they resettle—they are paid by the head.   It is all about the quantity they bring in and not about the quality of life for refugees.

For quality of life and how it could be, readers, go here, and see what I said about how refugee resettlement could be done. And, here is the link to the group’s blog, Refugee Resettlment Support.  These folks will bring a smile to your face.

Another Bhutanese refugee robbed at gunpoint

This time it’s Georgia and there were no murders, but funny I have to read this in  Bhutan News Service rather than an American publication.   Below is the whole short article.

One refugee girl was robbed by a group of three people yesterday at around 12 AM local time in Stone Mountain city in Georgia on August 7.

Anupama Koirala, a former refugee from Timai camp, sector B/2, Hut no 19, was returning from her job along with her friends and a brother when the incident took place in front of her own apartment. They were being followed by three men as soon as they stepped in on Marta, the local bus that runs in the city.

After they got down at CVS pharmacy and headed towards Wyn View Apartments, where they live, they followed them further about 10 minutes before one of them pointed a gun at Shanti Ram Dhungel, a friend of Anupama. Then they snatched the purse from the girl and fled the scene before the police arrived.

This is one of the incidents of attacks on the resettled refugees in row. Lately the refugees have been living in intimidation; and it appears that those who work at night and who do not own car have been targeted more.

Read about the robbery and murder of another Bhutanese refugee here.