Stimulus money to be used to pay rent for refugees

Refugees (and others living in poverty) fearing eviction in Georgia (or unable to pay utility bills) will soon be able to dip into funds set aside by Congress in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 originally promoted by the White House and Congress as a jobs creation bill.   We all thought we were going to be fixing bridges and such.

In a memo dated May 19th, Georgia’s Commissioner of the Department of Human Resources, BJ Walker, announced the funding availability under the Georgia Fresh Start Program.

The Georgia Fresh Start program is funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) and is designed to assist low income families with a specific critical need. This program is being piloted in 13 metro Atlanta counties, Augusta and Columbus through partnership with the United Way. The program will be active statewide as of June 7, 2010.

Fresh Start is a short-term crisis oriented benefit that will provide a one-time assistance payment for needy families to get the caught up on past due shelter and/or utility expenses, or assist them with move-in costs associated with renting a new dwelling. The maximum payment per family shall be up to $3000.

I didn’t find much about the program on-line except this United Way notice to come and get your money.  Regular readers know I hate these so-called public-private partnerships.  If the government is giving out money, then the government should be administering it, not the United Way (what will their cut be?).

If you would like to learn more about this new program, contact the Georgia Dept. of Human Resources (in Atlanta) directly at 404-651-8409.

Other states are probably getting this “crisis” program going too.   Of course, it will once again just postpone the hard decisions that must be made at the federal level about how many refugees we admit to the US in an economic recession.

Go here and see that we are right on target to bring the highest number of refugees to the US since 2001 (before 9/11 when the numbers dropped precipitously).

Ft. Wayne: health program for Burmese refugees to end

This is the beginning of the straight news story about the end of the Advantage program for Ft. Wayne, Indiana refugees:

FORT WAYNE, Ind. (WANE) – A state funded program that assists Burmese refugees coordinate health care needs will end this summer.

The Indiana Family and Social Services Administration’s 18-month contract with Advantage Health Solutions ends on July 1. The Indiana-based group helps arrange health care providers, translation and transportation services for Burmese refugees.

The program, which cost more than $100,000 a year, was designed to be a temporary transition and education tool according to the FSSA. Spokesman Marcus Barlow said the service should have helped community members learn how the American health system works allowing them would then be able to spread that knowledge to others.

It’s not responsible to keep [the program] going indefinitely. It was just intended for a certain amount of time to get people used to the services, people [to know] services exist,” Barlow said.

O.K. that didn’t sound too horrible, the program was to teach refugees how to find health care, but this Twitter Journalism report sounds a lot more ominous.

Indiana will cut funding to health services caring for Fort Wayne’s Burmese population. Illnesses such as tuberculosis, HIV and hepatitis, with greater percentages in the Burmese community than Fort Wayne at-large, will go untreated due to the funding cuts to social services. Without proper treatment there is a worry that these illnesses will flourish in the Burmese community and then to the rest of Fort Wayne’s population as well as overloading emergency rooms.

“Fort Wayne’s Burmese population is a ‘reservoir of HIV, resistant tuberculosis, hepatitis B and hepatitis C,’ ” Lutheran Health Network CEO Michael Schatzlein wrote to a colleague in February, quoting his infectious disease specialist, Dr. Suzanne Smith-Elekes.

Some fear that by not having the foresight to treat these illnesses early on, they could spread. By cutting services and programs that deal with preventative medicine and educating the refugees to receive proper treatment may be more costly in the long run.

Fort Wayne Mayor Tom Henry told Family and Social Services Administration (FSSA) officials that “ending the Advantage program without an effective follow-up strategy will put public health at risk, lead to a less-healthy refugee population, overburden the local health care system and … , cost the state more than it is currently spending on refugee health care.” Fort Wayne now has over 5,000 refugees and has worked with catholic charities, St. Joseph Community Health Center and other organizations to have established a Community Resource Center to assist them.

Then we have this comment by Deb McMahan, the Health Commissioner for Allen County.  Funny thing is that we heard from her here in 2007 and it seems like not much has changed.  Ft. Wayne could have said NO (for awhile) to more refugees but didn’t, so no sympathy here.

“We invited them here. We should be able to assist them.” said Allen County Health Commissioner Deb McMahan.

Not to worry, Obamacare has passed and all this will be taken care of out of Obama’s stash!

Comment worth noting: Iraqis have great expectations

A commenter, Ben Ezra, writing in response to this post about Iraqis going to Detroit, tells us the following as an explanation for why Iraqis have such high expectations for life in America:

Iraqi Refugees come with high expectation, they think USA will be heaven for them. Overseas Iraqis love to tell fabulous stories about being paid salary for just being refugees in USA and they don’t have to work until 8 months, their rent will be paid and they will get food stamp for 5 years that goes along with health insurance for ever, and they will be placed in expensive houses with new furniture and a car above all that a church will help them with extra money.

New readers should know that many Iraqi refugees have been very disappointed with their lives in America and some have even returned in disgust to the Middle East.

By the way, we have written 470 previous posts in our Iraqi refugee category for anyone wishing to learn everything they ever needed to know about Iraqi refugees.

Feds issue terror watch for Somalis coming across the border—too little too late

Blulitespecial spotted this story today.   Fox News is reporting that Somalis suspected of being linked to Al-Shabaab are coming across America’s porous borders and possibly forming sleeper cells—gee no kidding!    We have been writing about this since 2008 because they are likely blending into the large Somali refugee populations in major cities.   Only recently reader Khadra, who says she is a Somali born in the US, warned us too (be sure to read comments).

From Fox News:

The Department of Homeland Security is alerting Texas authorities to be on the lookout for a suspected member of the Somalia-based Al Shabaab terrorist group who might be attempting to travel to the U.S. through Mexico, a security expert who has seen the memo tells FOXNews.com.

The warning follows an indictment unsealed this month in Texas federal court that accuses a Somali man in Texas of running a “large-scale smuggling enterprise” responsible for bringing hundreds of Somalis from Brazil through South America and eventually across the Mexican border. Many of the illegal immigrants, who court records say were given fake IDs, are alleged to have ties to other now-defunct Somalian terror organizations that have merged with active organizations like Al Shabaab, al-Barakat and Al-Ittihad Al-Islami.

In 2008, the U.S. government designated Al Shabaab a terrorist organization. Al Shabaab has said its priority is to impose Sharia, or Islamic law, on Somalia; the group has aligned itself with Al Qaeda and has made statements about its intent to harm the United States.

[….]

J. Peter Pham, senior fellow and director of the Africa Project at the National Committee on American Foreign Policy, said that for the past ten years there’s been suspicion by U.S. law enforcement that drug cartels could align with international terrorist organizations to bring would-be-jihadists into the U.S.

That kind of collaboration is already being seen in Africa, said Dr. Walid Phares, director of the Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

Too little too late—they are already here.  See also the news about the Somali smuggler trial in Virginia last week.

Pham says the DHS alert comes too late. “They’re just covering themselves for the fact that DHS has been failing to date to deal effectively with this,” he said. “They’re already here.”

Michael Weinstein, a political science professor at Purdue University and an expert on Somalia, said, “In the past year, it’s become obvious that there’s a spillover into the United States of the transnational revolutionaries in Somalia.”

“It’s something that certainly has to be watched, but I don’t think it’s an imminent threat,” he said. “This has to be put in context with people smuggling — everybody and their brother is getting into the United States through Mexico; I read last week that some Chinese were crossing, it’s just a big market.”

Pham disagrees. “The real danger is ‘something along the lines of jihadist version of ‘find a classmate,’ he said, referring to Al Shabaab’s potential to set up sleeper cells in the U.S. “Most of them rely on personal referral and association. That type of social networking is not beyond their capabilities.”

Pham says the DHS alert is too little, too late.

Read it all.

If the Somali issue explodes, the Open Borders movement is dead.

For new readers, more Somalis are already on the way (in addition to the illegal ones cited above):

The US State Department has admitted over 80,000 Somali refugees to the US (this linked post continues to be one of the most widely read posts we have ever written) in the last 25 years and then in 2008 had to suspend family reunification because widespread immigration fraud was revealed through DNA testing.  That specific program has not yet been reopened (that we know of), but will be soon.

Nevertheless, thousands of Somali Muslims continue to be resettled by the State Department as I write this. We recently learned that we will be taking 6000 Somalis this year from one camp in Uganda and as many as 11,000-13,000 total from around the world.

Through the Refugee Resettlement program alone 2141 legal Somalis have already arrived in this fiscal year (2010) as of April 30th with an unknown number arriving through other legal programs and  illegally across both our borders.

Reminder! The Feds have set up a crime tips hotline for Somalis, here.   Any newly arrived men from Africa in your town or city, maybe you should let the authorities know.

Senators Leahy and Sessions scuffle over refugee program expansion bill

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) has an interesting piece in its legislative updates for the week about the hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Leahy’s bill (we mentioned it here)  that would, among other things, make it easier for asylum seekers to enter the US.

Here is what FAIR says:

During last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Ranking Member Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) clashed with Chairman Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Ver.) regarding his refugee bill. Entitled the “Refugee Protection Act of 2010” (S. 3113), Leahy’s bill seeks to amend the current process that aliens must follow in order to receive asylum or refugee status.

Despite the fact that the U.S. currently admits more refugees annually than all other nations combined, Leahy opened the hearing by charging that U.S. law does not do enough to welcome refugees. Leahy argued his bill was necessary to “restore our Nation as a beacon of hope for those who suffer from persecution around the world.” (Hearing, May 19, 2010; See also Leahy’s Written Statement, May 19, 2010). In contrast, Sessions said in his opening statement that he was “proud to live in a nation that is so welcoming of those who are facing persecution” and that “we need to be diligent in our analysis of any proposal that seeks to change the law by which people are admitted into the United States.” (Hearing, May 19, 2010).

Sessions then identified several provisions of Leahy’s bill that he deemed to be “problematic.” These included:

Go to FAIR and read the rest.  It is very good.   I was especially interested in the testimony of a former refugee who was alarmed by the lax protection from terrorism the bill affords.

Completely off topic: For a laugh watch this campaign ad for an opponent of Leahy’s in Vermont.