More refugee terrorist hearings — this time in the House

Here is a short news story from Fox News (hat tip: one of my friends from Tennessee) alerting us to a hearing scheduled for later this month in the House of Representatives on the recruitment of Somali refugees to return to Africa for Jihad training.

The Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee will hold another hearing on Muslim radicalization.
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., plans the third in a series of controversial hearings for July 27. It will focus on the

Somalia-based al-Shabaab terrorist organization and its recruiting tactics in the U.S.

“In Minnesota, Ohio, and other states, dozens of young Muslim males have been recruited, radicalized, and then taken from their communities for overseas terrorist training by al-Shabaab,” King said in a statement. “This coordinated and ongoing recruitment and radicalization of young Muslim men in the U.S. is a serious and growing threat to our homeland security and simply cannot be ignored.”

King has been widely criticized by Muslim groups and some Democratic members of the Homeland Security Committee for holding hearings that focus strictly on Muslim radicalization rather than all types of radicalization.

Just a reminder, last week the Senate Homeland Security Committee held a hearing on how Iraqi refugees with links to terrorist activities in Iraq got into the US, here.

This morning we reported that a trial has opened in the Minnesota Al Shabaab recruitment case.

Somali terrorist defense: the Ethiopians made us do it

Ever since we started reporting in 2008 on the missing Somali former refugee youths who left the good life in Minnesota to go back to Africa for Jihad training, we have been hearing that it was all about ousting those bad Ethiopians from their homeland (never mind that most of these youths had never even seen their homeland).   It was a convenient excuse for joining Al Shabaab (an Al Qaeda affiliate) and the US Senate Homeland Security Committee was happy to buy into that excuse in March of 2009, here, too.

Now I see that one Somali, whose trial we are told opens today in Minneapolis, will say they were just fighting for their country (never mind that we thought they wanted to be Americans—isn’t that what the refugee program is for? Or, is it for raising healthy Islamic warriors to adulthood?).

From the Minneapolis Star Tribune:

MINNEAPOLIS – A group of Minneapolis-area Somalis, including some who traveled to their homeland to allegedly take up arms against the Ethiopian army, held secret meetings in 2007 to plan the trips, created fake itineraries to fool family members and challenged one another about their commitment, prosecutors contend in a court filing.

The document was filed this week in advance of a trial for one man accused of being part of the conspiracy.

It sheds new light on how the recruiting operation worked in Minneapolis and how some of the men arrived at safehouses in Somalia, where they received AK-47s and weapons training.

Since the fall of 2007, at least 21 men have left Minnesota for Somalia, where authorities believe they joined the terror group al-Shabab. Eighteen people have been charged in Minnesota in connection with the case, including Omer Abdi Mohamed, who goes on trial next week on terror-related charges.

Mohamed never traveled to Somalia, but he is accused of helping others who did. His attorney calls the allegations ridiculous.

“Omer was never involved in terrorism,” said defense attorney Peter Wold. “It certainly stirs the public sentiment to suggest that, but it is not part of this case, not a part of Omer, and that will be abundantly clear.”

Somalia has not had a functioning government since 1991, when warlords overthrew a socialist dictator and then turned on each other, causing chaos in the African nation of about 7 million people.

In 2006, Ethiopian soldiers, which many Somalis viewed as abusive, occupied parts of Somalia and a militant group called al-Shabab fought against against them. The U.S. declared al-Shabab a terrorist organization in early 2008.

According to prosecutors [even the prosecutors have bought into the Ethiopians made us do it defense—ed], starting in September 2007, Mohamed and others conspired to raise money to send men to Somalia to violently oust the Ethiopians. Others were also recruited to the cause. The group held meetings at mosques and restaurants, and took measures to keep things secretive.

Remember readers these are “youths” who received from taxpayers a roof over their heads, food stamps, jobs, and an education—the American Dream!   They said, s**** America we are going to be Jihadists!

So, now that the Ethiopians are not a problem in Somalia, how do they explain the recent rash of new American recruits who have gone to join Al Shabaab?

And, what do you make of the announcement earlier this month that Al Shabaab is capable of attacking within the US, here?

A little nugget of information on food stamp fraud

This is another article on an immigrant-run convenience store getting in legal trouble for questionable practices involving food stamps.  This guy, Jalal “Jimmy” Israil, has been dropped from the program and it doesn’t seem to be as big a deal as the multi-million dollar scams we have seen elsewhere, but the article in the North County Times had this bit of information I don’t want to lose.

Over the past 10 years, 8,045 retail stores nationwide were permanently disqualified for trafficking, Fox said. She said that in 2010, USDA conducted nearly 5,000 undercover investigations.

It looks like we can thank Obama for something—his administration seems to be going after this food stamp fraud epidemic.

Indians taking advantage of the great American Asylum scam

Thousands of Indians (from the booming economy of India) are being illegally smuggled across the US/Mexican border each year according to this account from AP in the Brownsville Herald.  Hat tip:  Gary.

LOS FRESNOS — Police wearing berets and bulletproof vests broke down the door of a Guatemala City apartment in February hunting for illegal drugs. Instead, they found a different kind of illicit shipment: 27 immigrants from India packed into two locked rooms.

The Indians, whose hiding space was furnished only with soiled mattresses, claimed to be on vacation. But authorities quickly concluded they were waiting to be smuggled into the United States via an 11,000-mile pipeline of human cargo — the same network that has transported thousands of undocumented immigrants from India, through Central America and Mexico and over the sandy banks of the Rio Grande during the past two years.

Indians have arrived in droves even as the overall number of undocumented immigrants entering the U.S. has dropped dramatically, in large part because of the sluggish American economy. And with fewer Mexicans and Central Americans crossing the border, smugglers are eager for more “high-value cargo” like Indians, some of whom are willing to pay more than $20,000 for the journey.

[…..]

Between October 2009 and March 2011, the Border Patrol detained at least 2,600 undocumented immigrants from India, a dramatic rise over the typical 150 to 300 arrests per year.

[…..]

Most of the border-jumpers are seeking jobs, even though India’s economy is growing at about 9 percent per year. Once safely inside the U.S., they fan out across the country, often relying on relatives who are already here to arrange jobs and housing.

Indians have flooded into Texas in part because U.S. authorities have cracked down on the traditional ways they used to come here, such as entering through airports with student or work visas. The tougher enforcement has made it harder for immigrants to use visas listing non-existent universities or phantom companies.

The four Central American countries that have given the Washington DC area the greatest number of illegal aliens are some of the jumping off points as the Indians travel across the world to get to the US via drug routes through Mexico.

Also contributing to the spike was a quiet change in travel requirements in Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Honduras. Beginning in 2009, those nations sought to attract investors by allowing visitors from India to enter without visas.

[…..]

Smugglers often move their cargo from India to Mexico via intermediate stops such as Hong Kong and Macao and other parts of China, as well as Singapore, Amsterdam, Ecuador, Brazil, Belize and Panama.

The pipeline shuffles Indians north using the same “plazas,” or corridors, preferred by cartels moving drugs into the U.S., Hinojosa said.

If they are not caught they disappear into the United States, if caught they claim they are persecuted back home!

Indians caught by U.S. authorities often claim they fled their homeland because of religious persecution. Then they wait for months in federal detention centers like Port Isabel, in the town of Los Fresnos, about an hour’s drive from the Texas-Mexico border.

On a recent morning at Port Isabel, young Indian men wearing navy blue detention uniforms filled the benches in Immigration Judge Keith Hunsucker’s courtroom. Sixteen of the 32 cases on the docket were Indian immigrants, including Salimbhai Mansiya, from the state of Gujarat, who had been detained more than a month earlier.

Through an interpreter, Mansiya told the judge that he needed more time to find an English speaker who could help him fill out an application for asylum. The judge ordered his case delayed.

The Justice Department’s Executive Office for Immigration Review received 951 requests for asylum from Indian nationals between October and March — a six-month tally nearly equal to 1,002 asylum requests received from Indians in all of fiscal 2010.

Some seeking asylum can arrange to have their bond paid and are set free. Then they melt into American society and skip subsequent court dates. Immigration courts eventually order them deported, but only in absentia.

[…..]

Many of the Indians apprehended are Sikhs, followers of India’s fourth-largest religion, who tell authorities they face persecution back home and want asylum. Applicants need to convince officials that they have a credible fear of persecution in India. If so, the case is referred to an immigration judge.

Such persecution was common in the mid-1980s, when the state battled a Sikh secessionist movement, Kumar [Pramod Kumar an Indian Political Scientist] said. But today the ruling party in Punjab is Akali Dal, a Sikh party, and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is also Sikh.

“It’s all nonsense,” Kumar said of asylum claims.

There is more, read it all.

To understand more about our flawed and increasingly abused asylum system visit our category Asylum seekers.  Note the most recent case of a highly publicized asylum scam, here, when it was learned that the alleged rape “victim” in the DSK case lied magnificently in her asylum application.

Just a little background.  Asylum and refugee resettlement are the two halves of the Refugee Resettlement Act of 1980 (Kennedy/Biden/Carter).   Refugees are screened elsewhere in the world and brought to the US, asylum seekers arrive in the US on their own steam and say they are persecuted for one of several reasons—political views, religion, sexual orientation (that’s a biggy now).  Here is a definition from the Migration Policy Institute*:

Asylees: According to the US Refugee Act of 1980 and based on the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, any aliens, whether their current immigration status is legal or not, who are physically present in the country or at a port of entry may apply for asylum. An asylum seeker acquires asylee status when his or her application has been processed and approved and asylum is granted. A person granted asylum in the United States is entitled to a social security card, employment authorization, and other assistance.

*Incidentally, the Migration Policy Institute, although neutral sounding, is actually a pro-Open Borders outfit in Washington.

Oh, this is funny, I thought I would check on some numbers and came across this UN report with the blaring headline: ‘Asylum seeker numbers nearly halved in last decade, says UNHCR.’

But, get this, go down to the eighth paragraph and see that the US is the largest recipient of asylum seekers and our numbers are up!