Alinskyism (Day 18)

This has little to do with refugees, but it is just another in my continuing series on community organizing which ultimately has a lot to do with immigrants.

Good (more than good) communication skills are the key to the kingdom for a community organizer according to Saul Alinsky in “Rules for Radicals.”   To be a successful  community organizer one must be able to lure people in—people who might be dissatisfied but don’t really know why.   The organizer will eventually bring them to the answer,  not tell them the answer, by listening and asking leading questions.

In order to suck people in (really that is what it is) the organizer must be a great actor and take himself (or herself) into the EXPERIENCE of the targets—the people who need organizing.   Thus for example the white Jewish guy organizing in Chicago’s black neighborhoods sought out someone like Barack Obama to be the point person knowing full well that he himself couldn’t make a credible case for for being black and poor.   Although one could argue that Obama didn’t know what that was like either.

Well, Saul Alinsky gives us a little example of how one can’t succeed when one talks about large sums of money that are outside of people’s experience.    Regular people tune out and go away.    I’m mentioning this here because conservatives might take this lesson and attempt to communicate  on the bailout to conservative grassroots by putting the huge sums of taxpayer money that will be used for the bailout into terms people can more readily understand. 

In fact, Obama knows full well that by using such large figures most people will just go away.

Here is what Alinsky said in 1971:

This is the problem of trying to communicate on the issue of the H bomb.  It is too big. It involves too many casualties.  It is beyond the experience of the people and they just react with, “Yeah it’s a terrible thing,” but it really does not grip them.  It is the same with figures.  The moment one gets into the area of $25 million and above, let alone a billion, the listener is completely out of touch, no longer really interested, because the figures have gone above his experience and almost are meaningless.  Millions of Americans do not know how many million dollars make up a billion.

One more thought on this business of getting into someone else’s experience.  I think Obama is going to have a really hard time communicating and getting ‘into the experience’ of military men and women.   Did you notice at Christmastime how uncomfortable he looked visiting troops stationed in Hawaii?  And, how about last summer when he skipped visiting the troops althogether in Germany?  Perhaps military service  is one experience he can’t act his way into.

To illustrate my point, Time magazine, in an article about Jim Jones, Obama’s National Security Adviser and lifetime member of the military, quoted Jones as saying of Obama, he is “a very very good listener.”     But, I have no doubt that he (Obama) knows exactly where he wants to lead Jones.

New Study: How immigration flows are effected by US economy

The Migration Policy Institute has just released a report entitled: “Immigration and the Current Economic Crisis.”

Here is what ImmigrationProf blog has to say about it.  (I’m linking their news story because I wanted you to see this blog by immigration law professors anyway).

With the United States in an economic crisis that may already be the worst since the Great Depression, a report (Download lmi_recessionjan091.pdf ) issued today by the Migration Policy Institute finds that the recession may produce differing results for legal and illegal immigration flows. The report, Immigrants and the Current Economic Crisis, cites a growing body of evidence suggesting there has been a measurable slowdown in the historic growth of immigration in the United States, largely because there has been no significant growth in the unauthorized immigrant population since 2006.

“Legal and illegal immigration flows respond differently in an economic crisis,” said Migration Policy Institute President Demetrios Papademetriou, an author of the report. “Legal permanent immigration flows are the least responsive to economic pressures, while illegal immigration flows are the most responsive.” “Still, substantial return migration of unauthorized immigrants is unlikely unless there’s a protracted and severe worsening of the U.S. economy,” Papademetriou added. The report examines the effects of the economic crisis and factors such as immigration enforcement on the immigrant population already in the United States; predicts how future immigration flows may be affected; discusses how immigrants fare in the U.S. labor market during recessions; and offers possible policy prescriptions.

For us, the gist of what is being said here is that refugees and other legal immigrants will keep coming even when there are no jobs.   Guess that just means that Americans who are working will be paying for the legal refugees to live on welfare.

The illegal flow may slow or even reverse.

India rescued Rohingya boat men, but…..

Update Jan. 19th:   Read about the meeting of human rights activists and the Thai Prime Minister at the Bangkok Post here.

….India has its own Rohingya problem as we reported just last month.   From one of the metastisizing Rohingya stories this week about the alleged mistreatment (some say murder) by the Thai military of illegal alien Rohingya Muslims trying to get into Thailand:

India’s coast guard said Sunday it had rescued hundreds of the refugees from the Rohingya ethnic group, who live along the border of Myanmar and Bangladesh, but that hundreds more were feared lost.

At least this story (AFP from Port Blair, India) mentions a reason for why the Thai Navy might not want Rohingya in Thailand.

Thailand is facing a brutal separatist insurgency in the south of the country that has left more than 3,500 people dead in the last five years, and the government would be sensitive about any mass influx of migrants.

An “expert” from Human Rights Watch discounts that fear.

David Mathieson, an expert on Myanmar with New York-based Human Rights Watch, said Thailand had for the past few years taken a harsh stance on Rohingya landing on its shores, in part because they wanted to discourage further migration of the group through Thailand.

There were also fears that some are mercenaries trying to join the separatist insurgency, although Mathieson said there was little evidence to back up those claims.

Coincidentally, India arrested Rohingya passing through India to get to Pakistan just a few weeks ago.   Here  again is the post I did on that just after Christmas.   Indian officials contend that Rohingya have joined the HuJI—Harakat ul-Jihad-I-Islami (HUJI) (Movement of Islamic Holy War).  I have  no further word on what India did with those they detained.

We have been following the Rohingya issue for more than a year now with 46 previous posts in our special category, Rohingya Reports.   If at some point anyone wants to know more about their newly arrived neighbors and how they got there (mark my words they will be resettled to your town one day), you will be able to understand the public relations campaign that brought them to the West.

Update a few minutes later:  Thai Prime Minister to meet with human rights groups tomorrow and contends that Rohingya may be involved in drug trafficking and human smuggling and not Islamic terrorism.

Newsweek: Somalis save Lewiston, ME by bringing population growth

Update Jan. 24th:   Thanks to Mars for sending this update.  I knew it couldn’t be true and now comes an article from the local paper about the disappointment the residents feel about the very incomplete  picture Newsweek has painted of the town.  Will post more in a little while.  Here is my post.

Update Jan. 21st:   AP is reporting some of the real truth, employment is over 50% for Somalis in Lewiston, ME area.

Update Jan. 18th:   Recent report says immigrants cost the economy more than they add, so how can Lewiston now be booming?

Everyone has heard the horror stories about the Somalis who found Lewiston, ME about eight years ago and came en masse.  The mayor at the time wrote a letter to Somali leaders asking them please to not encourage more refugees to come to Lewiston and that caused a firestorm of criticism.   The local folks were called racists by the big city folks reading the big city papers.  Here is an article from VDARE at the time.

Now Newsweek tells us Lewiston has become a boom town thanks to the immigrants.

That was before a family of Somali refugees discovered Lewiston in 2001 and began spreading the word to immigrant friends and relatives that housing was cheap and it looked like a good place to build new lives and raise children in peace. Since then, the place has been transformed. Per capita income has soared, and crime rates have dropped. In 2004, Inc. magazine named Lewiston one of the best places to do business in America, and in 2007, it was named an “All-America City” by the National Civic League, the first time any town in Maine had received that honor in roughly 40 years. “No one could have dreamed this,” says Chip Morrison, the local Chamber of Commerce president. “Not even me, and I’m an optimist.”

Africans continue to arrive.

….. the Somalis kept coming, followed by Sudanese, Congolese and other Africans. By some estimates, 4,000 new immigrants have moved to Lewiston since 2001, and dozens are still arriving every month.

But, Newsweek never really tells you what is making the economy boom.  There is still no major industry.  Certainly a few African shops  and restaurants aren’t going to fuel the whole economy.   All I can figure is that it is a government based economy.  By that I mean, government grants and special loan programs for refugees help open shops.  Language teachers are needed and are hired with federal grants.  Refugees receive food stamps and other types of welfare and get special treatment from lending institutions to purchase homes (where have I heard that before?). 

Newsweek might have more fairly balanced this article with quotes from a few critics.   Surely there are even some environmental types in Maine who do not buy the  ‘expand the population formula’ for economic growth.

“Increasingly, there’s an acceptance that immigration is associated with good economic growth,” says urban-studies specialist Richard Florida, director of the University of Toronto’s Martin Prosperity Institute. “How is Maine going to grow? It’s a big state with a sparse population. One of the ways to grow quickly is import people.”

To top off the joy the economic boom has brought to Lewiston,  the refugees have brought that most cherished of all community attributes—cultural diversity.

Cultural diversity was the missing piece.” The question is whether the rest of Maine—and other states like it—can find their own missing pieces.

Hey, states that have tiny or non-existent immigrant populations such as Montana, Wyoming, and West Virginia, eat your hearts out!

Endnote:  I just searched our archives for Somalis in Lewiston stories and there are some unhappy locals there still.    Here is one in particular.   Amazing how that Newsweek reporter found no one with a differing opinion.  The stories coming from Lewiston are so diametrically opposed that it makes me wonder what the real truth could be.

Having fun at USASpending.gov

I know I mentioned this wonderful government resource some time back, but I don’t think it was completely finished at the time (I’m not sure its completely finished yet).  In any case there is lots more information available now and I can barely drag myself away from it—-it is so much fun!

I started by looking up some of the Top Ten Volags ( non-profit federal refugee resettlement contractors) to see what they got from the taxpayers in 2008.   I went to this page “assistance” (that means grants rather than contracts) and just filled in the name of the organization.  You will see you have all sorts of differant ways to look up how much money the federal government is giving away.

I found out that in 2008 the following members of the Top Ten got some Big Bucks:

Ethiopian Community Development Council   $5,531,290

Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society  $16,648,877

World Relief (Evangelical organization)  $18,745,431

Church World Service  $19,234,460

International Rescue Committee  $64,830,191

And the champion is!   Not able to find US Conference of Catholic Bishops I searched for Catholic Charities.

Catholic Charities  $85,402,886  

Call in the ACLU!

Then check out this page for how much the State Department sent last year to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees—almost a half a BILLION dollars.   Also, see that we supplied the special refugee agency that is funding generations of refugees in Gaza, UNRWA, $188,012,600 for 2008 alone!

And remember that Somali Center of Nashville that got in legal trouble awhile back over misappropriated federal grant monies, well they got another $150,000 in 2008.