Watching the Rohingya story metastasize

The story about the Rohingya Muslim boatmen attempting to get into Thailand (or accidentally ending up there trying to get to Malaysia) is growing.   Once CNN reported the supposed “whipping” on the beach story yesterday, like sharks, the media is all over this.    I used to see  a couple of stories on Rohingya a few times a week, today there were over ten.

If you are reading this and thinking, well what do illegal aliens in Thailand have to do with me, think again.   Whether wholly true or not this story will be used by human rights groups to demand more resettlement of Rohingya to Europe, the US, Canada, New Zealand and Australia.

It is true that the military junta in Buddhist Burma (Myanmar) where these men originated is into ethnic and religious nationalism.   They don’t want all the minorities they have.  We have been resettling the Christian Burmese (mostly Karen) by the thousands and some Muslims too.  Officially we are not taking the Rohingya and I guess this is because they have been linked to Islamist groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda.   However, Rohingya are being resettled in the west, most recently the UK and Canada.

If you are new to this issue, check out the first post I wrote on Rohingya (exactly a year ago) here and also check out our whole category on the subject.  There are lots of posts there about Rohingya moving into countries throughout southeast Asia.

This latest move—Rohingya boatmen going to Thailand either on purpose or by accident has now gotten the attention of the western press.  Reports vary (and that is the problem!) about whether the Thai army is sending Rohingya back to sea without paddles.

At least the BBC has addressed (but poo-pooed) the issue of whether the Rohingya have come to join the Islamic insurgency in Southern Thailand, and that is more than CNN did.

They (unnamed officials) explained that Rohingyas are seen as a greater security threat than the tens of thousands of other illegal migrants, because they are Muslim, because they tend to arrive in large numbers at one time, and because they are almost (Edit:  I have seen no account of any women at all) exclusively men.

Immigration officials told us there is no evidence to support the allegation made by some in the military that Rohingyas have gone to Thailand’s deep south to join the Islamic insurgency there.

The officials have told us that while most of the Rohingya want to go to Malaysia – where there is already a community 20,000 strong and the prospect of well-paid jobs – increasing numbers are staying in Thailand. The official figure last year was 4,886, and the unofficial figure may be much higher.

The case of the four drowned Rohingya.

I have three accounts of the alleged case of four drowned Rohingya just to show how the incident is reported variously by the media, and why it is hard to know what to believe.

From the Straits Times of Singapore:

Rights activists say one of the boats pushed back out to sea later capsized, killing at least four refugees and leaving another 300 missing.

From Short-News in Germany:

In one case 4 people were drowned to encourage over 400 others to board a drifting barge. Several were later rescued, but 300 are missing after trying to swim to shore. Other times the navy will confiscate engines leaving refugees to drift at sea.

From the BBC:

On 18 December one group of just over 400 was put on a navy boat, which was towing a barge behind it, says Chris Lewa from the Arakan Project.

Their hands were tied. Once out at sea they were ordered to move onto the barge at gunpoint. They refused. The Thai troops then tied the feet of four of them and threw them overboard.

Apparently the same incident!   Pick the version that suits you best!

CNN gets in on the Rohingya story today

Update Jan. 17th:   The story is growing like a cancer.

While I was out today, I happened to notice a TV tuned to CNN with a trailer that said something like ‘Thailand denies whipping refugees on beach.’   Here is the story CNN has reported today on the alleged mistreatment by the Thai military of Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar and Bangladesh arriving illegally in Thailand.

This is what a representative of Refugees International told CNN:

“The Thai government is taking highly vulnerable people and risking their lives for political gain,” says Refugee International’s Sean Garcia says.

“It should be engaging the Burmese government on improving conditions at home for the Rohingya if it wants to stem these flows.

I don’t get it, Mr. Garcia, what political gain is Thailand getting out of this?  And, what the heck is “engaging the Burmese government”.     I hate it when these yakkers tell other people (or countries) to start “engaging!”   Engaging how?   More talking?   

And, I noticed too that CNN never mentions that the Thai government is afraid this latest huge influx of Rohingya men (they have not brought women and children) have actually come to Thailand to join the Islamic insurgency in the south of that country.  Oh no, it’s all about the immigrants, never about a country protecting its sovereignty or the safety of its citizens.

I don’t mean to suggest that Thailand shouldn’t treat the Rohingya humanely, they should.    Detain them, treat them well, and deport them back to where they came from.    But, I can just see it coming….actually I hear the drumbeats.

The US will have to airlift them to a town near you, just as the Maltese boat people are being brought to America or the Iraqis by the tens of thousands.

For more on the Rohingya, see our category here, including all of our recent posts on the Rohingya boat men.

Movin’ ’em out in Malta: US will take a bunch more illegals

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has set up an office in Malta to help move the illegal aliens, mostly Africans, (we told you about their rioting the other day), that arrive there by the boatload, to countries willing to take them.   This article says they don’t have enough case workers to process the boat people, so  not wanting to slow the process, Malta is seeking to hire more.

Several countries have pledged themselves to resettle a number of people given refugee status in Malta, but this can only be done once their case is fully processed.

They are pinning hopes on the new EU Immigration pact, however…..

The spokesman denied that there were any current bottlenecks in the processing of refugee status, noting that less than 100 places have been pledged within the EU.

It is really O.K. though because we, the United States, will take more and probably give them tea parties too!

On April 2008, however, the United States Embassy pledged its intention to continue its resettlement program, which it said would allow “hundreds more refugees living in Malta to be resettled in the US”.

By the way, Malta Molly, aka Ambassador Tea Party,  is returning to the US soon and cites her work in helping Malta’s illegal aliens get to your neighborhood as one of her accomplishments.

A report on Iraq’s Internally Displaced people worth checking out

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) released a report this month on the situation in Iraq regarding its internally displaced people.  ‘Refugees’ are returning to their homes but often face problems when they do so.

IRAQ – Growing Numbers of Displaced Returning Home Continue to Face Basic Needs – Although there are growing numbers of internally displaced people (IDPs) returning to their homes within Iraq, many are coming back home to be faced again with basic needs including shelter, health care or water and sanitation.

In the latest IOM needs assessment of Iraq’s internally displaced people, the report highlights Baghdad as the main destination for returnees but that often people are going back to find their homes destroyed and key infrastructure in disrepair. Many homes need to be rebuilt and buildings, water pipes, electrical networks and basic public services such as health centres are cited as in need of repair and rehabilitation to meet the needs of returning IDPs or refugees.

Note that fears of sectarian violence, not US military action, is primarily responsible for the shifting population.  290,000 have returned home so far.

There are an estimated number 2.8 million IDPs in Iraq, of which 1.6 million have been displaced since February 2006 when the bombing of the Al-Askari mosque in Samarra triggered a new upsurge in violence. A further 2.4 million Iraqis are refugees, living predominantly in Iraq’s neighbouring countries. Since 2006, IOM has identified more than 290,000 people who were internally displaced or who left Iraq as refugees as having returned to their homes.

When you look at the IOM report note that the largest majority were displaced from Baghdad (63.9%).  Then these numbers I found surprising.  A smaller percentage of the population, the Sunnis, controlled Iraq under Saddam.  So, I was under the impression from news reports that the Shia majority was now getting even and causing Sunni displacement, but these numbers show the opposite story.   Displacement breaks down as follows:

Arab Shia Muslim 57.7 %

Arab Sunni Muslim 30.7%

Kurd Sunni Muslim 3.7%

Assyrian Christian 2.8%

Chaldean Christian 1.7%

As Judy reported on many occasions, the Iraqi government must get on the ball and make the transition home as easy as possible.  It will be a key to Iraq’s future.  Right now US NGO’s are happy to drain Iraq of its best and brightest by airlifting them to the US to compete with increasingly out of work US workers!

CAIR helping US State Department find sponsors for Palestinians from Gaza

Reader Whuptdue just brought this information to our attention.  You have probably heard on the news that American citizens are being evacuated from Gaza and brought to the US, but I didn’t know they were coming with their non-American families.    I wondered who these people are and why they were living in Gaza.  According to Fox News there are 150 families involved.   Now I see, read on.

WASHINGTON — The State Department is arranging the evacuation of about 150 Americans and their non-American family members who have been trapped in Gaza during Israel’s military operations against Hamas militants there.

[….]

So far, the department has evacuated 27 people, 16 Americans and 11 non-American family members, from Gaza since the fighting began on Dec. 27. They were taken by convoy to Amman, Jordan on Jan. 2.

From Earth Times about the US State Department emergency plan:

WASHINGTON, Jan. 14 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said today that the U.S. Department of State’s Visa Office has set up an e-mail address, GazaAssistance@state.gov, to help coordinate assistance for American citizens and their family members who plan to travel to the United States after being evacuated from the Gaza Strip. 

[….]

…. it’s a very specific type of assistance that the Department of State, in conjunction with other U.S. government agencies, is coordinating: some of the Gaza family members require sponsors who will take on the responsibility of providing room and board during their stay in the United States. The sponsor can be a non-governmental organization, or a private individual.

“Sponsorship would require a high level of commitment on your part. We’re planning that some families will require assistance for up to six months, so you would be committed for that period of time. At the end of six months, families would either be leaving the United States (likely returning to Gaza), or making their own arrangements for a longer stay in the United States. [Editor:  be assured they will get immigration lawyers specializing in asylum and poof—permanent residency in no time]  Sponsorship is completely voluntary, but once you’ve decided to commit, only the most extraordinary circumstances would change the obligation. Although you would sign an affidavit of support and provide it to the U.S. government, the assistance that you provide is a private arrangement between a sponsor and the family that is being assisted…”

At RRW we have long advocated that any refugee entering the US should have individual or group sponsorship (one family=one sponsor) so that the burden of the refugee did not fall on the taxpayer, however, I was still wondering how it is that Americans had non-American families in Gaza and that they had no other family in the US.  

Who are these families?

I got my answer at CAIR’s website:

State Department officials tell CAIR that some of the almost 150 potential evacuees do not have family members in the United States. A number of those seeking evacuation are non-citizen parents of young American-born children. CAIR is calling on individuals and relief groups to offer support.

So, are we seeing the results of birth tourism?   Did Mom just happen to be in the US for a little visit around her due date?

It is young children who are the US citizens and are bringing Palestinian Mom and Dad to the US for six months or longer.  Hummmm!

*CAIR is the Council on American-Islamic Relations.  All of our previous posts on CAIR are here.