The UK is stirring a hornet’s nest: no assimilation=no welfare

This will be fun to watch, a proposal is being put forth in Great Britain to kick out immigrants who don’t learn English and participate in British society.   Hat tip:  Counter Jihad blog.

From the Daily Mail on Saturday:

A highly controversial crackdown on immigrants accused of abusing welfare handouts is to be unveiled by Home Secretary Alan Johnson this week.

He plans to ban wives brought here, mainly from India and Pakistan, from receiving child benefit and a wide range of other state aid unless they learn English, support British values and do voluntary work in the community.

The move could affect up to 80,000 immigrants who are allowed to settle permanently in Britain each year after marrying a UK citizen.

Many come from remote villages in the subcontinent, have little formal education and cannot speak a word of English. Under existing laws, they are automatically given indefinite leave to remain after just two years.

Crucially, that qualifies them to receive state benefits, even if they never become British citizens with UK passports or learn English.

However, Mr Johnson wants to scrap indefinite leave to remain. He intends to force immigrants who use marriage to get into the UK to take a citizenship test. They will not be allowed to take it for at least five years and if they fail, they will be banned from receiving benefits.

Read on.  We will be watching how this plays out!

More homegrown terrorists on trial, one is from a Bengladeshi immigrant family

We have been telling you the long and twisted tale of Somali-Americans who have been raised since very young children in the US, but who have turned into Jihadists as young men.  Now comes a case going to trial in Georgia of a young man whose parents immigrated to the US, but he himself was born here and still his allegiance is to Islam and he allegedly planned a terrorist mission within the US.   Hat tip:  Blulitespecial.

Authorities began building a case against Ahmed and Sadequee — both U.S. citizens — after they took a bus to Toronto in March 2005 and met with at least three other targets of an FBI investigation.

While there, investigators said, Sadequee and Ahmed discussed potential terrorist targets in the U.S., including military bases and oil refineries. They also said the group discussed a way to disrupt the worldwide Global Positioning System.

A month later, the two piled in Ahmed’s pickup truck and drove to Washington to shoot footage of U.S. landmarks and other less notable sites, such as a fuel depot and a Masonic Temple in northern Virginia, authorities said.

Sadequee sent at least two of the clips to an overseas contact days after he returned, authorities said, disguising them as “jimmy’s 13th birthday party” and “volleyball contest.”

Then Sadequee, who was born in Virginia and is of Bangladeshi descent, decided to head abroad himself. Authorities said he departed for Bangladesh in August 2005, where he would get married and attempt to link up with terrorist groups overseas.

While he was abroad, he continued to communicate with Ahmed and other suspected terrorists, authorities said. One of the alleged contacts was Mirsad Bektasevic, a Balkan-born Swede who was convicted in 2007 of planning to blow up an unidentified target in Europe to force the pullout of foreign troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.  [I’m wondering if Bektasevic is a Bosnian muslim taken in by “welcoming” Sweden?]

How did all the immigrants from Bangladesh get here?

The article doesn’t tell us where Ahmed’s family originated, but Sadequee’s is from Bangladesh.   I didn’t think we were taking refugees from Bangladesh and sure enough I couldn’t find any mention of them in the Office or Refugee Resettlement stats, here.

I did find this report which tells us many Bangladeshis (aka Bengalis) are here illegally and in the past a large number won the infamous Diversity Visa lottery!

More recent immigration waves have brought much larger numbers of both documented and undocumented immigrants from Bangladesh. Between 1982 and 1992, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization service legally admitted 28,850 Bangladeshi. From 1988 to 1993, some 6,000 Bangladeshis also won visas through a lottery. But there is also a large number of undocumented Bangladeshis living in the United States. Some estimates are as high as 150,000, with more than 50,000 living in the metropolitan New York area alone. Other large enclaves of Bangladeshis can be found in Los Angeles, Miami, Washington, D.C., and Atlanta. In Los Angeles, the Bangladeshi community is centered in and around the downtown area, where shop and restaurant signs are often in Bengali.

That same report tells us that 85% are Muslim.

More than 85 percent of Bangladeshis follow the tenets of Islam, the state religion of Bangladesh since 1988. Most of them are of the Sunni sect with a small number of Shi’ite Muslims, mostly the descendants of Iranian immigrants. Only about ten percent of the population is Hindu; the remaining population consists of Buddhists, Christians, and followers of various other sects.

And here is an article that tells us they are working really hard NOT to assimilate (sounds like the Sadequee’s succeeded in keeping their son from becoming westernized!).

They strive to uphold their cultural values and traditions even while living in the United States. These immigrants have created ethnic communities in which they are able to form a Bengali subculture in the United States and better resist assimilation. These immigrants also strive to raise their second-generation children in traditional Bengali manner, so that they will also resist assimilation into the American culture.

Once the immigrant seeds are planted, the US government allows family members to follow and thus the numbers grow exponentially.

This page at the US Department of State website tells us that 50,000 Bangladeshis are on the list to enter the US as family members.   It is the seventh largest group in a list that includes China and Mexico among the six countries above it on the list (none of those on the list above Bangladesh are Muslim countries).

Oh, I almost forgot, in my reading I learned that Bangladeshis travel back and forth to their mother country a whole lot.

Comment worth noting: “We came here with lot of hope…”

Every few days I’m going to find a reason to post something new on the Bhutanese refugees (others too) placed in crime-ridden neighborhoods by government refugee contractors. 

I’ll keep posting the topic until some mainstream media reporter tells the story!

Last night we heard from Krishna who says the following about the tragic death of Hari in Jacksonville, FL last week, here.

I was totally sad and sorrow with this news.We came here with lot of hope and spend happy life but it is dangerous life in USA.We spend happy life in camp but here, we have to spend our life with sad and sorrow life.We came here to save life but time to give life without reason.
We pray to his family.

Reporters:  This is how it should be done—one family sponsored by one church or other organization.  By the way, I have a hunch that there is something fishy about these large apartment complexes where refugees are all placed together—there is some funny-money business going on that needs to be exposed.

Chesler: What do we do with child barbarians?

Phyliss Chesler writing at Pajamas Media asks that provocative question about the four Liberian boys who raped an 8-year-old girl whose parents then rejected her, and Chesler got an earful in response.    Hat tip:  Susan and Paul.

Most Americans have no idea how different our culture is from cultures in the Middle East, central Asia, or Africa. If differences are acknowledged, America and the West are blamed for them. The barbarism, genocide, perpetual civil and religious wars, the cruelties of Sharia law (stoning, cross-amputations, be-heading), and the utterly tragic treatment of women, children, and the poor in the Third World– all are blamed on western imperialism, colonialism, and capitalism.

Not true–or so I have been arguing for years. Some barbarism is indigenous to a region. But even if it were true–what’s to be done now? Should we willingly welcome cannibals, gang-rapists, child-rapists, polygamists, (dis)honor murderers to our shores? 

[….]

Immigrants bring both their barbarism and their traumatized histories right along with them when they come to America. 

She goes on to describe what happened in Phoenix last week adding some additional details we didn’t know, and wonders what are we to do about this growing problem.

….. And what is our solution? To grant a token number of culturally “different” people immigrant status and then allow them to create parallel universes* of Hell on American soil? How many such immigrants can America afford to heal, re-educate, house, feed, and train? Can we do this in situ? Can anyone?

*One of the reasons we have created these parallel communities that Chesler refers to is that refugees and asylees are basically dumped off in big apartment complexes with their own kind.  I think the refugee agencies must consider that the politically correct thing to do.  If refugee families were assigned sponsors for a year and we did away with this cultural relativism crap (sorry!) so popular in Leftwing circles these days, we might not see so much of the barbarism unleashed.  If we are going to take refugees from cultures diametrically opposed to ours, we need to teach refugees what is acceptable behavior in the US and what isn’t.  WE NEED TO DEFEND OUR CULTURE! (Well, most of it anyway!).

Obama extended their stay! 

The other day I told you that many Liberians were only here temporarily and that they were to be deported to Liberia on March 31st.  Chesler found out that the Obama Administration gave them another year.

In September of 2006, the Department of Homeland Security announced its decision to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Liberians. This status allows people to remain in the United States temporarily, during an armed conflict or environmental disaster. In 2007, President George W. Bush granted Deferred Enforced Departure (DED). The grant expired on March 31st, 2009. President Obama extended DED for another twelve months.

Of course this has to be one of the most farcical immigration programs we have—who in their right mind thinks we are going to bring people here for a few years and then deport them when they are all settled in.  Heck, it’s hard getting rid of illegal aliens after they have established themselves, and these Liberians came legally!

Chesler wraps up her essay with this:

I do not know what to do about the child barbarians who gang-raped this girl and who live with Liberian families who will blame the girl, not their sons. Do you?

Last I looked there were 62 comments, many with some pretty straightforward suggestions on what to do.   (BTW, I am not the Ann in the first comment!)

Refugee Resettlement Support: a new blog

Update August 5th:  See another installment of this group’s how-to on refugee resettlement.  It brings a smile to my face because this is the type of initiative that could serve as a model everywhere in the US!

Refugee Resettlement Support is a relatively new blog a reader directed me to yesterday.  It appears to be a group of church people who sponsor one family at a time—a practice we have long advocated (instead  of the present, widely used method, of a contractor just dropping families off in a rotten neighborhood in your city).   Although they obviously get their family assignment from a government contractor, this Wisconsin group does all the rest.

One church or one group per refugee family would cost the taxpayer less and help assure the family would assimilate to America.  Ultimately one could get rid of the government contractor middle-men and families could be assigned to churches (or other organizations) directly from a state or federal agency.

The goal of this blogger, Jeffrey Kirk, gives me pause, however!

This website is dedicated to helping refugees find home. Together we can help resettle 10 million refugees by 2030 or sooner!

I’m wondering if “home” for a majority of the world’s “refugees” might best be in their own cultural comfort zone, in their own region of the world.

Check out yesterday’s post at Refugee Resettlement Support where they are giving a day by day description of the resettlement process involving a Burmese family of eight.  The family initially wanted to live in Milwaukee with relatives, but this group had a nice place picked out for them in their town.  The family ultimately chose the nice house and not the cramped apartment in the city.   Incidentally, this section of the post concerns me.

In contrast to the 13 people stuffed into a two-bedroom apartment in Milwaukee they will be living with 8 people in a three-bedroom house in Waukesha.

I think every city in the nation has laws about how many people can live in an apartment and I am sure the US State Department has contractual arrangements with the volag, Lutheran Social Services in this case, that would dissallow that crowded living arrangement.   So, I wonder why that might have even been contemplated.

I look forward to reading more of Kirk’s birds-eye view of the refugee resettlement process.

By the way, maybe some nice church groups could rescue the Bhutanese families in that crime-ridden neighborhood in Jacksonville, FL.   I doubt that poor Hari would have been murdered if his family had a group like this helping them get settled.