Louisville, KY: Get your healthy refugee-grown veggies….

….after all, you, the taxpayers of America paid $65,000 to grow them!  And, you can use food stamps to buy them too!  Sounds like a perfect model for Obama’s redistribution of wealth doesn’t it!  Your money grows the vegetables and your money buys them.  Michelle Obama says, …”it’s a model for the world.”   But, but , but , what happens when you run out of other peoples’ money?

Here is the story from Catholic Charities of Louisville’s website:

Please purchase your produce from our clients!  You get a chemical-free product that is harvested hours before sale, maximizing the nutritional content for you and your family.  Also, please forward this information to your networks so we can all support refugee growers.  We take Debit Cards and EBT (Food Stamps) at all of our Farmers Markets!!

Here is the federal grant program that funds this competition for American Mom & Pop growers and small farmers.  Check it out, you will see Louisville at the top of the list (wonder how much of this money Catholic Charities gets to keep for itself?)    Is your city there too?

Detroit area workshop set up to teach Syrians to apply for temporary protected status

You know the story, the Obama Administration granted TPS to Syrians* inside the US (they could even have gotten in illegally or be here as a visa-overstay), but now they get to stay.  This “temporary” bit is a joke because as far as I know no one is ever sent back once their country is o.k.—just ask the hundreds of thousands of Salvadorans here on TPS for over ten years.

From AP:

Troy — A group will hold a town hall meeting and legal clinic in the Detroit area on Saturday designed to provide assistance to Syrians looking to temporarily stay in the United States beyond the expiration of their visas.

The Obama administration has said it will allow Syrians to temporarily stay beyond the expiration of their visas and not deport those in the country illegally due to deteriorating conditions in their native country.

The United for a Free Syria-hosted event will be held at the Troy Public Library and feature immigration lawyers available to take questions from attendees.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano in March says Syrians will get temporary protected status because they’d face “serious threats to their personal safety” if they were to return to Syria.

*Here is one previous story I’ve written at RRW on TPS for Syrians.

UNHCR: We don’t want those Rohingya either, not our problem

Too much of a hot potato for UN head honcho socialist and squanderer of our tax dollars Antonio Guterres also I see.

The gist of this story is that Burma’s (Myanmar) President apparently said to the UN—‘you take care of the Rohingya or send them to a third country for resettlement.’

From the Boston Globe:

YANGON, Myanmar—The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees on Thursday rejected a suggestion by Myanmar’s president that the world body resettle or take care of ethnic Rohingyas who have settled in the Southeast Asian country.

UNHCR chief Antonio Guterres told reporters it was not his agency’s job to resettle the Rohingya, who live in western Myanmar but without Myanmar citizenship.

On his website, President Thein Sein said he told Guterres in a meeting Wednesday that the solution to ethnic enmity in Myanmar’s western Rakhine state was to either send the Rohingya to a third country or have the UNHCR look after them.

Clashes last month between Buddhist Rakhines and Muslin Rohingya left at least 78 people dead and tens of thousands homeless. The Rakhine consider the Rohingya to be illegal immigrants from neighboring Bangladesh.

Readers the latest round of violence began when three Rohingya men raped and murdered a Rakhine girl.  Buddhists retaliated by killing Muslim “pilgrims” on a bus and there has been much rioting since.

Guterres, in rejecting Thein Sein’s plea, said this situation is not one the UN can undertake.

“The resettlement programs organized by UNHCR are for refugees who are fleeing a country to another, in very specific circumstances. Obviously, it’s not related to this situation,” said Guterres.

However, since the Rohingya are fleeing to Bangladesh (a Muslim country that doesn’t want them either), it strikes me as completely analogous to the Bhutanese situation (although that case doesn’t involve Islamist agitators).

Many people in Myanmar don’t recognize as legitimate settlers even those of Bengali heritage who came in the 19th century, when Myanmar was under British rule and called Burma.

Large exoduses of Rohingya to Bangladesh in the 1980s and 1990s because of persecution, and their subsequent return, also add to the confusion over who is an illegal immigrant.

The UNHCR (and mostly the US) did exactly what Sein is asking relating to the so-called Bhutanese who were really originally Nepali illegal aliens in Bhutan.  Bhutan wanted Bhutan for its people and expelled the formerly illegal alien Nepalis.  Nepal didn’t want them back, so camps were created by the UN and thanks to the Bush Administration State Department we now have tens of thousands of Bhutanese/Nepalis arriving in the US.  (We were going to take 60,000 over 5 years, but I bet we are over that number now).

Don’t misunderstand, I am not advocating that we take the Rohingya Muslim problem off their hands, I’m just pointing out that Guterres is being inconsistent here.

Thein Sein again:

“We will take responsibility of our ethnic nationals but it is impossible to accept those Rohingyas who are not our ethnic nationals who had entered the country illegally. The only solution is to hand those illegal Rohingyas to the UNHCR or to send them to any third country that would accept them,” Thein Sein told Guterres, according to his website.

Meanwhile, an Islamist pressure group is turning the screws on democracy advocate Suu Kyi.

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation is weighing in and demanding that Suu Kyi defend the Rohingya (from Democratic Voice of Burma):

The head of the 57-member pan-Muslim body called for the quick “return of the victims to their respective properties”, expressing his “deep concern about the unabated and continuous violation of Rohingya rights in [Burma]“.

In the letter, Ihsanoglu invited Suu Kyi to visit OIC headquarters in the Saudi Red Sea city of Jeddah.

Gee, while Suu Kyi is in Jeddah (with a headcovering) perhaps she could find out if there is truth to this 2009 story—that 3000 Rohingya are being held in Jeddah prisons.

New readers:  This is our 110th post in our category Rohingya Reports.  We have been following the issue for nearly 5 years and you should know that federal refugee contractors including the US Conference of Catholic Bishops are advocating for the continued resettlement of Rohingya “refugees” to your American towns and cities.

Study: Iraqi refugees not working and in poor health; need more costly health care

I came across this interesting report just now entitled, Mental and Physical Health Status of Iraqi Refugees Resettled in the United States.

When you open the report, be sure to see the 4th frame with the map of the US depicting where the 63,000 or so Iraqis resettled (at the time of this undated report) to the US have been sent.  Of course, Wyoming shines like a bright light having received zero refugees, but look closely—VP Joe Biden’s Delaware is among the handful of states receiving only small numbers of refugees.  I find that so amusing since ol’ Joe helped create the Refugee Resettlement Act of 1980 with ol’ Teddy (Kennedy), yet Delaware gets only a tiny number of the neediest immigrants.

Back to the study and its results.

Here is the summary:

23% not covered by health insurance

67% not currently working ***

63% rated physical health as fair or poor

23% married to their first cousins

Chronic Diseases

60% ≤1 condition

37% ≤2 conditions

Mental Health Conditions

50% reported emotional distress

31% at risk for PTSD

Then here are some comments the refugees made during a forum:

* I will submit a request for social security pension because this will ensure having Medicaid…

* I am worried they will stop the Medicaid and I still have many operations to do…

* Medicaid will be canceled if my husband income exceeds a certain limit,….I feel that I am a burden to my husband because if he worked for extra hours, they would cancel my Medicaid. I need it for my psychological and physical health problems…

* We can handle stopping the food stamps but not the Medicaid…

* The more honest you are in explaining your medical problems, the less they will believe you……

* Please tell the Medicaid staff that when I am smiling in their face, that does not mean I am fine, nobody knows what I am going through and the pain I have……

It sure is a good thing that Obamacare will soon rescue these unhealthy refugees.

*** What do you make of that—67% not working.  Didn’t we just hear a couple of days ago that over 80% (almost 90%!) of the refugees living in Manchester, NH have work?  Maybe we should send more Iraqis to Manchester?  (Just kidding!)

New readers take note:  We have a health issues category, here, with 130 posts covering many very important topics involving immigrant health.

An afterthought:  When you look at that map and notice that the largest number of refugees are assigned to California, think about that when you read that some California cities may soon “cease to exist.”

Manchester, NH mayor still trying to slow the flow of refugees to the overloaded city

Longtime readers know that the resettlement of refugees to Manchester, NH has been contentious for years.  Recently an effort was made, but failed in the State Legislature to allow for temporary moratoriums on refugee resettlement to NH towns.

Here is the latest from Manchester.  From the Union Leader:

MANCHESTER — The International Institute of New Hampshire hopes to resettle another 200 refugees in the city through next year, even as city officials say their sometimes strained relationship with the organization is improving.

The revelation last year that IINH would seek to bring 200 refugees to the city this year prompted Mayor Ted Gatsas to issue a harsh letter to the U.S. State Department, which oversees the refugee program, faulting its “complete and utter lack of consideration for the local resettlement community.”

Pointing to challenges many of the thousands of refugees already in the city face, Gatsas has sought a moratorium on new arrivals, and he called on the Executive Council to withhold federal contracts to IINH and other resettlement agencies.

Gatsas has said IINH, which is part of the Boston-based International Institute of New England, has not been open about its plans or responsive to the city’s concerns.

Are they working?

Gatsas said he was concerned that IINH wanted to resettle another 200 refugees in the city.

“My question is whether the 75 refugees they’ve resettled (as of May 31) all have jobs,” he said.

The agency claims 86% are working, however, they play a little game with those employment numbers.  They push refugees into any menial job they can find and report that they are employed.  Some are let go or quit in short order, but the agency can brag about a big percentage who have found employment.

Then this next bit of information was interesting.  I wonder if there are comment opportunities in other states?  We will have to look into that!

While the State Department is responsible for approving the number of refugees sought by a local agency, officials coordinate with the state office on the application. The state office is also responsible for disbursing the millions of dollars in federal funding that go to resettlement agencies.

The comment period for the resettlement requests begins July 20 and ends Aug. 8. During that time the state office will seek input from a number of stakeholders, including the Refugee Advisory Council, according to state refugee coordinator Barbara Seebart.

For background on the Manchester refugee controversy, just type ‘Manchester’ into our search function.