Just a quick further note on that Vox article (“bizzaro rant” cute huh!) about me yesterday.
It is important to know that the Left loves Alinsky—Saul Alinsky—and they have learned his lessons well. So, you need to learn them too. Read Rules for Radicals! (short description here at wikipedia)
Remember when Obama, America’s #1 community organizer, first entered the White House, his administration tried Rule 13 on Rush Limbaugh, but it didn’t work! Ha! Ha! Ha!
BTW, if you didn’t know, Alinsky’s book is dedicated to Lucifer!
What Vox (and others) are doing now is employing Rule #13, not just against me, but against so many more important people on our team:
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
What they don’t understand is that I get energized by attacks like that!
And here is the rule you should be applying to them! Use Rule #5:
“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
The war for the future of our great country is now well underway. Find your place in it! And, laugh!
After the abrupt halt to the UN/US Refugee Admissions Program last Friday evening, the Trump Administration granted a reprieve for 872 approved refugees already on the way.
As of early this morning, Wrapsnet has logged in 843 of the 872. See our report yesterday,here.
Here is where the 843 went:
It is one thing for everyone to debate whether Australia’s rejected asylum seekers (supposedly as many as 1,250) will come to America, but where in America? (Seeyesterday’s post) Shouldn’t your town have a say about whether you want any of them or not?
Photo and story here about sexual abuse of children in the camp on Nauru: http://www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/270643/australia-accused-of-tolerating-abuse-in-nauru
House and Senate Judiciary Chairmen identifiedthose rejected by Australia as from the following countries:
Iran
Sri Lanka
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Somalia
Iraq
Sudan
Stateless (most likely Rohingya Muslims from Burma/Bangladesh)
Tell the Trump Administration what you think, by clicking here.
See Clinton EO here: https://www.lep.gov/13166/eo13166.html
While I was data-diving at Wrapsnetjust now I thought it would be useful to let you know about the languages your school districts (hospitals, criminal justice systems, etc.) must cope with since you (local taxpayers) are required to provide interpreters at your expense.
Maybe President Trump should revisit the Clinton EO on the subject.
Trump should trash it too! Or, another option is to require the federal government to reimburse local governments/private hospitals etc. for the cost and thus force Congress to face the issue!
Gradually the feds have, across the board, dumped the cost of refugee resettlement on state and local governments, time for that to stop!
Here (at Wrapsnet) are the top ten languages through the first 3 months of FY2017. Dear ‘Welcoming’ communities, are you ready to provide costly interpreters in these and dozens of other languages and dialects?
If you have been reading RRW for ten years, you know this is like Christmas to me!
“New Americans” arriving on Malta (a nation in the European Union) from Libya (Libya the failed state thanks to Hillary/Obama). Photo: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-05-10/african-refugees-flee-libya-to-malta/2714380
Donald Trump’s EO on refugees stops the illegal flow of migrants who land in a safe EU country—Malta—to your towns and cities.
George Bush started this insanity and Obama continued it. Boat people from Africa arrive as illegal aliens on Malta. International law requires that they ask for asylum in the first safe country they reach—Malta (or in the case of the failed asylum seekers Turnbull is trying to pawn off on us, Australia)—instead many are just loaded up to Anytown, USA. Many are Somalis, btw. Where is Congress? There are many tweeks Congress could make to the Refugee Act of 1980 and one is to stop this practice of taking refugees from countries where they are perfectly safe AND WHERE IT IS THAT COUNTRY’S RESPONSIBILITY NOT OURS!
When I first began writing about this practice in 2007 or 2008 (I didn’t look back), a US State Dept. employee contacted me anonymously and told me that this “new” policy was heavily criticized internally.
If you are an ambitious reader, you might consider reading through dozens and dozens of posts I have on the topic by clicking here(or use my search window for ‘Malta.’)
Imagine my joy to see the ABC headline: US halts resettlement program from Malta. It is only for 120 days, but maybe that is time enough for Congress to do something to stop it completely.
You know, and I know, that there is no way to thoroughly screen migrants who came by boat from failed states in Africa!
Here is ABC News:
A decade-old program to resettle a fixed quota of refugees arriving in the small, southern EU nation of Malta to the United States is another casualty of President Donald Trump’s executive order on immigration.
U.S. Ambassador G. Kathleen Hill told Maltese media this week that the refugee resettlement program has been suspended for 120 days under the order.
It isn’t clear what will happen after the four months have elapsed. Hill said that the U.S. government is “reviewing the program” and the embassy is awaiting “further guidance” at the end of the 120 days.
More than 3,110 refugees have been resettled in the U.S. since 2007 to help ease pressure on Malta from the influx of migrants arriving by boat from northern Africa.
Processing country data at Wrapsnetis informative. I told you about it here not too long ago.
During the first 3 months of this fiscal year we admitted 170 of the migrants that Malta (the EU) didn’t accept and that Europeans had no will to turn back to Africa.
The first number is the case number and the second is the individual number. The ratio of cases to individuals tells us that most of those we took from Malta are single (men?).
