Missouri: Somali Teen Walks After Charges Dropped in Brutal Attack on Neighbor

And, if the violent attack wasn’t sickening enough, a staff attorney at juvenile court determined that his IQ was so low that he wouldn’t be able to help in his defense. The case was dropped.

From KSDK St. Louis (h/t Amy):

‘I’ve been failed by the system’ | Teen walks free after neighbor says he broke her nose, left her in bruises

ST. LOUIS — A St. Louis woman feels like the judicial system failed her, after she said her teenage neighbor attacked her and walked away free.


Alicia Clarke said exactly a week ago she went for a quick run outside her south city home. When she came back, she noticed her shoes had been moved to a different spot and her cell phone was gone.

From there, she used Find My iPhone to search for it. The location said it was on her property grid. She used her work phone to call it.

“I open my back door to call it and I hear it in my neighbor’s backyard behind me,” Clarke said.

Clarke said she hopped the fence to get it and jumped back over to her yard. Another neighbor yelled out to her and said, “Hey, I told him, ‘I know you did this and I’m calling the police!'”

Clarke said that’s when the 6-foot teen jumped the fence and tackled her.

After the initial assault, he came back with a weapon (a screw driver), continue reading to see what happened next.

Clarke thought the fight was over. But when she went to juvenile court a few days later, she learned his case was dismissed.

“The most hurtful thing of all of this, is the dropped charges. That was much more hurtful than the physical assault,” Clarke said.

A juvenile court official said a staff attorney dropped the case before even going to the judge. The courts weren’t able to comment specifically on this incident, since it involves a juvenile. Clarke said she was told her accused attacker was found incompetent to aid in his own defense because he has an IQ of 49.


Alicia has a broken nose, staples in her head and stitches to the puncture wound under her eye.

Clark’s sister who wants the story told far and wide posted this additional information on her facebook page.

Hassan is a 15 year old refugee from Somalia who lives with his family. He is 6’ and approx 175lbs, much larger than my sister. He has broken into Alicia’s car 3 different times and broken into another neighbors house. The police were involved every single time and reported that nothing could be done since he was a minor. Surely this time would be different, though.

Read the whole sick story, here.

There will continue to be many more cases like this one as we admit refugees who are mentally unstable and violent.

Spread the love

5 thoughts on “Missouri: Somali Teen Walks After Charges Dropped in Brutal Attack on Neighbor

  1. Is this what our country is becoming? Allowing brutal assaults and let them walk? This kid should at least be in a mental ward if he is truly incompetent. You don’t let killer loose because their mental capacity is 49. I hope this woman sues the St Louis DA.

  2. For years women in Europe have stated, the most dangerous activity they can do in their own cities is jogging.
    What follows is beating and rapes and a judicial system that favors the will, needs and wants of the Muslim migrant who commutes the crime.
    The most corrupt people on the planet are judges, politicians and police. Sharia compliant treasonous cowards.

  3. The name of the prosecutor who dropped the charges is Sakina Ahmad.
    This is just a case of muslims covering for fellow muslims.
    Just because he’s retarded doesn’t mean he isn’t dangerous. he should be placed in juvenile detention. When he’s old enough, send him back to Somalia; it’s not the job of The United States to babysit the world’s misfits.

    1. Thank you mjazz . That is huge. We should all bombard that prosecutor & judge with our disapproval. Can you get that phone # or email address for us?

  4. Disgust as a reaction is normal, especially considering this kid is, apparently, a repeat offender; of course saying nothing can be done because he’s a juvenile is wrong: juveniles are arrested and jailed all the time for criminal offenses; oftentimes they are tired as adults for serious crimes.

    Do you happen to know when the IQ assessment was done? — was it after his arrest? — or earlier? — are intelligence tests, or some assessment of cognitive ability, a normal part of juvenile processing? — or only when severely diminished cognitive capacity is suspected?

    TBH, the problem is not necessarily the resolution of the case, unless you believe there should be no such thing as being unfit to stand trial due to a cognitive deficit; if a person is too dumb to help with their defense, a court, or later an appeals court, would likely find a trial to be unfair — I think there is enough legal precedent for this.

    Instead the problem is that this kid and his family are here in the first place — that some “charity” was paid by taxpayers to inflict them on that community.

Leave a Reply